JaeKyun Ryu1,2, Won Beom Jung1,2, Jeong Pyo Son1, Seong-gi Kim1,2, and Jang-Yeon Park1,2
1Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
Synopsis
We recently
introduced a novel ultrafast 3D gradient-echo-based imaging technique using
spatiotemporal encoding (SPEN), which was dubbed RASE (Rapid Acquisition with
Sequential Excitation). RASE has less sensitivity to field inhomogeneities and
susceptibility differences compared to conventional multi-slice GE-EPI, sharing
the advantages of 3D imaging such as high signal-to-noise ratio and high
spatial resolution. In this preliminary study, we present very promising
results of RASE-II fMRI, i.e., better t-scores, tSNR, and BOLD
percent-signal-changes than conventional multi-slice GE-EPI, on a 9.4-T animal
scanner.
Purpose
We recently introduced a novel
ultrafast 3D gradient-echo-based imaging
technique using spatiotemporal encoding (SPEN)1,2, which was dubbed RASE
(Rapid Acquisition with Sequential Excitation). RASE not only provides high
immunity to image artifacts due to field inhomogeneities and susceptibility differences,
but also shares the advantages of 3D imaging such
as high signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) with high spatial resolution. Between two
types of RASE-I and II, we previously reported that
RASE-II could be applied to BOLD-fMRI with better tSNR than conventional GE-EPI2. Here, RASE-II fMRI was further
investigated presenting t-score maps and BLOD percent-signal-change as well as tSNR
in comparison with GE-EPI on a 9.4-T animal scanner (Bruker-BioSpec, 94/30 US/R).Method
Sequence:
Figure1 illustrates the RASE-II sequence diagram (a) and schematic description of its sequential and local excitation
and rephasing mechanism in SPEN direction (b).
A frequency-swept chirp pulse is used for spin excitation producing a quadratic
phase that sequentially localizes a signal in both time and space. In RASE-II,
spin excitation and data acquisition are performed with the same duration and,
between them, a rephasing gradient is
applied to make all the spins experience constant
TE. Also note that SPEN is applied for slab encoding3.
Experiment: BOLD responses to electrical forepaw-stimulation were measured using a male Sprague-Dawley (SD)
rat, aged 7-8 weeks, and weighing 270g. Rat was initially anesthetized with 4%
isoflurane in a mixture of oxygen and air gases
(1:9) and 2.5% during surgical preparation. After surgery, isoflurane anesthesia
was discontinued and a-chloralose was injected
(40mg/kg/90min). Two-needle
electrodes were inserted into a left forepaw of the rat under the
plantar skin between the second and the fourth digits to induce the electrical-stimulus
pulses (333.0-ms pulse width and 1.5-mA current) at a frequency of 3 Hz. Each trial consisted of three
consecutive periods: resting(49.92s; 20volumes)-stimulation(19.97s; 8volumes)-resting(49.92s; 20volumes).
Common scan parameters were: volume-TR/TE = 2,496/25 ms, FOV = 30×15mm2,
matrix = 96×48, number-of-slices = 48, slice-thickness = 0.31mm, FA(Ernst angle) = 75°(for
GE-EPI), 14°(for RASE-II). For RASE-II imaging specifically, shot-TR = 52ms, pulse-length(Tp) = 18.43ms, R-value of the chirp pulse (=Tp×Bandwidth) = 64. Images were reconstructed offline with MATLAB(ver.8.2.0;
R2013b) using
the superresolution algorithm in SPEN direction4.
Results
Figure2 shows fMRI results
of three-trial average using GE-EPI(a,c) and RASE-II(b,d) on the
somatosensort area of in-vivo rat brain. First and second rows display t-score
map of BOLD activation(a,b) and tSNR map(c,d), respectively. Table
in the third row shows t-score distributions over the activated voxels,
focusing on t-scores above 3. RASE-II provided more activated
voxels with higher t-scores than GE-EPI in the somatosensory area, especially making a huge difference in the
range of high t-score > 8. The maximum t-score of GE-EPI and RASE-II
was 9.05 and 11.65, respectively. In terms
of tSNR, RASE-II was overall better than GE-EPI, which is
consistent with previously reports that 3D imaging provides better tSNR than 2D
counterparts when thermal noises are dominant over physiological noises, e.g.,
in high spatial resolution5,6. Figure3 shows the BOLD percent-signal-changes calculated in the same ROI which
consists of 33 voxels around the voxel with the maximum t-score in GE-EPI.
RASE-II (red line, maximum 21.5%) provided higher BOLD percent change than
GE-EPI(blue line, maximum 12.7%) by a factor of ~1.7.Discussion & Conclusion
In this preliminary study,
a new ultrafast 3D gradient-echo-based sequence, RASE-II, showed very promising
results for fMRI, providing better t-scores, tSNR, and BOLD percent-signal-changes
than conventional multi-slice GE-EPI. Such a nice performance of RASE-II fMRI might
be understood in several respects: As a 3D imaging technique, RASE-II can
provide a higher SNR than 2D counterparts. In addition, when thermal noises are
dominant over physiological noises in high spatial resolution, tSNR is also
better in 3D imaging5,6. Besides, the fact that all spins experience
constant TE in RASE-II can partly contribute to enhancing t-scores or percent-signal-change
when an optimal TE is used to maximize BOLD effects. Since RASE-II is more T1-weighted
due to shorter shot-TR, inflow effects might also contribute to the improvement
of t-scores or percent-signal-change, but might not be significant because inflow
effects are expected not to be high in 3D imaging with low flip angles like
RASE-II. Rather, intra-vascular contribution can be a more significant factor8. While intra-vascular components barely contribute to BOLD signals in
GE-EPI due to T2* shortening, they can still work to some extent in
RASE-II because RASE-II has less sensitivity to T2* shortening due
to its intrinsic local refocusing mechanism1,2. A further
study is warranted to fully elucidate the sources of RASE-II fMRI signals by investigating
TE-, TR- and R-value dependency.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by
IBS-R015-D1.References
[1] Ryu JK, et al. A new ultrafast 3D
gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging method: RASE-I. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting
of ISMRM. 2017.
[2] Ryu JK, et al. A new ultrafast 3D
gradient-echo-based imaging method: RASE-II. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual
Meeting of ISMRM. 2017.
[3] Ryu JK, et al. Utilizing 3D
spatiotemporally encoded imaging from a different perspective. In Proceedings
of the 23th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. 2015.
[4] Chen Y, et al. Partial fourier
transform reconstruction for single-shot MRI linear frequency-swept excitation.
Mag Reson Med. 2013;69:1326-1336.
[5] Poser B.A, et al. Three dimensional
echo-planar imaging at 7 Tesla. Neuroimage. 2010;51:261-266.
[6] van der Zwaag w, et al. Temporal SNR
characteristics in segmented 3D-EPI at 7T. Mag Reson Med. 2012;67:344-352.
[7] Jin T, et al. Source of nonlinearity
in echo-time-dependent BOLD fMRI. Mag Reson Med. 2006;55:1281-1290.
[8] Gao J.H, et al. Inflow effects on
functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2012;62:1035-1039.