We investigated the cerebellar microstructure and wiring diagram in a mouse model of Down syndrome (DS), using HARDI-based tractography analysis. Our results showed an absence of cerebellar climbing fibers (CF) and/or mossy fibers (MF) in the intra-granule layer of the DS mice at neonatal stage, when those fiber tracts started to form in the control neonatal brains. In the adult mice, two groups of crossing fibers—the CF/MF fibers versus the parallel fibers (PF) were identified, but the number of crossing fibers and apparent fiber density was significantly reduced in the granule layer of the DS mice, especially for the CF/MF group.
Data acquisition: Ex vivo MRI of TsDn65 and Euploid mouse brains at postnatal day 6 (P6) and P31 (n=4 per group per time-point) was performed on an 11.7 T Bruker spectrometer with a 15 mm volume transceiver coil. HARDI data were acquired using a 3D diffusion-weighted gradient spin echo (DW-GRASE) sequence6. Imaging parameters are: resolution= 80 µm isotropic for P6 mice and 100 µm isotropic for P31 mice, TE/TR = 36/700 ms, 2 signal averages, δ/Δ=4/12 ms, 30 diffusion directions, and b-value=2000 s/mm2 for P6 mice and 2800 s/mm2 for P31 mice.
Data analysis: Reconstruction of the HARDI data were performed using constraint spherical deconvolution7 using MRtrix3 to obtain the fiber orientation density (FOD), based on which the number of crossing fibers and apparent fiber density (AFD)8 were derived. Fixel-based analysis9 was performed to evaluate the AFD of individual fiber groups. Probabilistic streamlines were generated with a fiber length between 0.2-0.7mm to obtain super-resolution track-density images (TDI)10. Cerebellar ROIs on the granular layer (GL), molecular layer (ML) and white matter (WM) of P31 mice, and intra- and extra-granule layers (IGL and EGL) and WM of the P6 mice, were manually delineated on 10 sagittal slides across the midline.
1. Tuch DS, Reese TG, Wiegell MR and Wedeen VJ. Diffusion MRI of complex neural architecture. Neuron. 2003; 40: 885-95.
2. Aggarwal M, Gobius I, Richards LJ and Mori S. Diffusion MR Microscopy of Cortical Development in the Mouse Embryo. Cereb Cortex. 2015; 25: 1970-80.
3. Reeves RH, Irving NG, Moran TH, et al. A mouse model for Down syndrome exhibits learning and behaviour deficits. Nature genetics. 1995; 11: 177-84.
4. Baxter LL, Moran TH, Richtsmeier JT, Troncoso J and Reeves RH. Discovery and genetic localization of Down syndrome cerebellar phenotypes using the Ts65Dn mouse. Human molecular genetics. 2000; 9: 195-202.
5. Olson LE, Roper RJ, Baxter LL, Carlson EJ, Epstein CJ and Reeves RH. Down syndrome mouse models Ts65Dn, Ts1Cje, and Ms1Cje/Ts65Dn exhibit variable severity of cerebellar phenotypes. Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2004; 230: 581-9.
6. Wu D, Xu J, McMahon MT, et al. In vivo high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of the mouse brain. Neuroimage. 2013; 83: 18-26.
7. Tournier JD, Calamante F and Connelly A. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage. 2007; 35: 1459-72.
8. Raffelt D, Tournier JD, Rose S, et al. Apparent Fibre Density: A novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. NeuroImage. 2012; 59: 3976-94.
9. Raffelt DA, Smith RE, Ridgway GR, et al. Connectivity-based fixel enhancement: Whole-brain statistical analysis of diffusion MRI measures in the presence of crossing fibres. NeuroImage. 2015; 117: 40-55.
10. Calamante F, Tournier JD, Kurniawan ND, et al. Super-resolution track-density imaging studies of mouse brain: Comparison to histology. NeuroImage. 2012; 59: 286-96.
11. Epstein CJ. The Consequences of Chromosome Imbalance: Principles, Mechanisms, and Models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.