Arzu Ceylan Has1, Sule Bicakci2, Elif Bulut3, Aygun Ertugrul2, and Kader K. Oguz3
1National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey, 2Department of Neurological Sciences and Psychiatry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, 3Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
Synopsis
We aimed to investigate white matter (WM) integrity
and structural differences in schizophrenia patients with clozapine-induced
obsessive compulsive symptoms (S-OCS) comparing them those without symptoms (S)
and healthy controls (HC). Tract-based-spatial-statistic/diffusion-tensor-imaging,
voxel-based morphometry, and caudate volume measurements were performed to reveal
underlying WM and gray matter (GM) alterations. S-OCS showed less fractional
anisotropy (FA) reductions in WM and less areas of reduced GM density than S
when compared to HC. FA elevations and increased GM density were observed in
S-OCS compared with S. The results may suggest differential effect of
clozapine, and/or different baseline pathophysiology in a subgroup of patients.
Purpose
Studies
have shown the relationship between development of obsessive compulsive
symptoms and clozapine treatment in patients with schizophrenia1,2. We
aimed to investigate white matter (WM) integrity and structural differences in
schizophrenia patients with clozapine-induced obsessive compulsive symptoms
(S-OCS) comparing them those without symptoms (S) and healthy controls (HC).
Methods
IRB
was obtained and all the participants gave signed consent form.
Subjects: Eighteen patients with
schizophrenia, under clozapine treatment for the past 6 months (age range:
18-65 years) and nine age-, sex- and education-matched HC (p>0.05)
participated in the study. Patients were categorized as S-OCS and S. The
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Score was higher than 16 for S-OCS and lower
than 8 for each S patient.
Image
Acquisition: A 3T
MR scanner (Ingenia, Philips) equipped with an 8-channel phase-array head coil
was used. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (single-shot EPI; TR/TE: 5283/99
msec, max. b factor: 800 s/mm2, 15 independent directions, 60 axial
sections, 2 mm thickness without intersection gap, voxel size: 2x2x2 mm), 3D T1W high resolution
(TR/TE: 7.9/3.5 msec; distance factor: %50) imaging were obtained.
Data
Processing and Analysis: TBSS, a
part of FSL3 was used for
multiple comparisons of the groups for DTI analysis. Fractional
anisotropy (FA) maps were computed following head motion and eddy current
correction, skull stripping and diffusion tensor fitting processes. Then, TBSS
procedures applied as described by Smith
et al4 for the multiple comparisons of the groups.
Computational
Anatomy Toolbox5 implemented in SPM12 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12/)
was used for voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis which included segmentation
of gray matter (GM), WM and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) tissue classes, Dartel
to estimate all the deformations, normalization to MNI atlas and smoothing
using a full-width half-maximum of 8 mm procedures. After getting the modulated
images, we applied two-sample t-test using basic model. We used total
intracranial volume (TIV) as covariates of no interest. TIV was calculated by
adding up segmented GM, WM and CSF volume in MATLAB for each subject. Two
sample t contrasts were then generated using FWE rate with an uncorrected p < 0.0001
threshold and thresholded cluster size with k of 10.
Upon our observation of SPM results we
decided to compute caudate nuclei volumes in the patient groups and HC using
Freesurfer (V5.3.0) (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/)6.
Two-sample t-test was applied to determine the differences between the groups.
Results
Compared to HC, S-OCS showed increased FA in
bilateral posterior limb of internal capsules and hippocampi and reduced FA
mainly in the corpus callosum (Fig. 1a). FA reduction was more extensive in S
than S-OCS, including the corpus callosum, right fornix, left anterior limb of
internal capsule, bilateral inferior frontal WM (Fig. 1b). Comparison of S-OCS
and S revealed FA elevations in the frontoparietal and anterior temporal
regions in S-OCS (Fig.1c). VBM yielded less voxel density in bilateral caudate
nuclei in both patient groups compared to HC, a finding not significant in
comparison of patient groups in between. (Fig. 2, 3 and 4). This
was also true with bilateral caudate nuclei volumes, which were significantly
reduced in comparison of patient groups with HC in left (ps-ocs=0.009,
ps=0.043) and right (ps-ocs=0.003, ps=0.037),
however disappeared in comparison of the patient groups (p=0.93 and 0.77). The insula and right cingulate gyri showed GM density reduction in S
together with some other cortical regions in the frontotemporal lobes, yet
showed no difference in S-OCS when compared to HC (Fig. 2 and 3, table 1).
Overall, S-OCS showed less GM density in 10 different cortical regions defined
by MNI atlas and S did so in 15 different regions in comparison with HC.
Furthermore S-OCS showed greater density than S in right frontal eye field
regions. A few regions including bilateral precuneus, left anterior prefrontal
cortex, left hippocampus showed lesser GM density in S-OCS compared to S (Fig.
4).Discussion and Conclusion
Both
S-OCS and S showed alterations in WM and GM of the brain. S-OCS showed less FA
reductions in WM and less areas of reduced GM density than S when compared to HC.
FA elevations in WM of frontoparietal and anterior temporal lobes and increased
GM density in the right eye-field region in S-OCS were observed. Previously, clozapine was
shown to increase NAA/Cre in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and cause
widespread alterations in WM integrity in patients with schizophrenia7,8. Differences in structural brain
findings of two patient groups in this study may suggest differential effect of
clozapine, and/or different baseline pathophysiology in a subgroup of patients.
The current imaging findings may reflect the end result of an adaptive or
maladaptive process caused by clozapine in an already malfunctioning brain. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
- Baker
RW, Chengappa
KNR, Baird
JW, et
al. Emergence
of obsessive-compulsive symptoms during treatment with clozapine.J. Clin. Psychiatry.1992;53:439–442.
- Ertugrul A, Anil
Yagcioglu AE, Eni N, et al. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms in
clozapine-treated schizophrenic patients.Psychiatry Clin Neurosci.2005;59(2):219-22.
- Jenkinson M,
Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, et al. Fsl. Neuroimage. 2012;62(2):782-90.
- Smith
SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Tract-based spatial
statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage.2006;31(4):1487-505.
- Gaser, C. CAT:
A Computational Anatomy Toolbox for SPM. http://dbm.neuro.uni-jena.de/cat/
- Fischl B, Salat
DH, Busa E, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of
neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.Neuron.2002;33(3):341-55.
- Ozcelik-Eroglu
E, Ertugrul A, Oguz KK, et al. Effect of clozapine on white matter
integrity in patients with schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study.
Psychiatry Res.2014 ;223(3):226-35.
- Ertugrul
A,
Volkan-Salanci B, Basar K, et al. The
effect of clozapine on regional cerebral blood flow and brain metabolite ratios
in schizophrenia: relationship with treatment response. Psychiatry Res.
2009;174(2):121-9.