The effects of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging resolutions on the correlations between standard trabecular structural indices and MR transverse relaxation-times (T2 and T2*) were evaluated by performing Monte Carlo proton diffusion simulations, ex vivo experiments with defatted human trabecular specimens, and bovine knee trabecular samples with intact bone marrow via 7T system. T2 relaxation-time robustly represented the trabecular micro-architecture, such as trabecular spacing and number, while T2* was vulnerable with degrading spatial resolution. T2 relaxation times may facilitate the radiation-free diagnosis to assess osteoporotic fractures and therapy response for deep trabecular areas within a feasible scan time on a 7T system.
Finite perturber method was employed in order to calculate the B0 shift of forty trabecular bone volumes (0.5×0.5×0.5 mm3) from a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).8 Multi-echo ultra-short echo-time (UTE) and multi-slice multi-echo (MSME) acquisitions were simulated by MC approach with the same imaging parameters of the defatted trabecular experiment. Voxel wise transverse relaxation-times were calculated by fitting the following mono-exponential decay model:$$S(t)=S_0\times exp(-TE/T_2^*\ or\ T_2) (1) $$
This study was approved by the Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology Institutional Review Board in accordance with the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration. Four trabecular bone specimens (10×10×10 mm3) were extracted from the distal femoral condyle during knee joint replacement procedures. After bone marrow was removed, the bone specimens were degassed in a water chamber and put into syringes with water. The MR transverse relaxation-times were measured with a 25 mm transmit/receiver coil on a Bruker 7T system. The imaging parameters are described in Table 1. To compensate for the differences in transverse relaxation-times of the water solutions, T2 and T2* values of the defatted trabecular samples were normalized with T2 values of the water only region.$$normalized\ T_2\ or\ T_2^*= \frac{T_2\ or\ T_2^*}{average\ T_2\ of\ water\ only\ region} (2) $$
3D structural bone images was obtained from micro-CT with the parameters described in Table 2. Micro-CT images were matched with corresponding UTE images using an 3D rigid body registration method. Each bone volume was segmented and divided into 27 sub-volumes.
A bovine knee articular cartilage cut into saws to match the size of 16 channel wrist array coils. MR transverse relaxation-times were measured using 3D multi-echo gradient echo and MSME pulse sequences on a Philips Achieva 7T system. 3D turbo spin echo acquisition was performed to obtain 3D structural information. Imaging parameters are described in Table 1. Bone included region was segmented and divided into 32 sub-regions. Trabecular structural indices, such as trabecular spacing, number, thickness, and bone volume fraction, were evaluated using a 3D sphere fitting method in BoneJ software.9-11 For each sub-volume, the mean MR transverse relaxation-times of the sub-volumes were compared with mean trabecular structural parameters.
Representative echo time dependent images of UTE and MSME simulations are shown in Figure 1A and 2B, respectively. The distribution of T2* reduced as the imaging voxel size increased for both the simulation and experiment (Figure 1C and 1D). By comparison, T2 was rarely affected by the imaging voxel size.
For the defatted trabecular experiment (Figure 2), strong correlations between MR transverse relaxation-times and trabecular spacing and number were found at 125 µm3. The correlation coefficients between T2* and the structural indices gradually decreased as the imaging voxel size increased while T2 maintained strong correlations.
Similar to the defatted trabecular experiment, significant correlations between MR transverse relaxation-times and structural indices of both trabecular spacing and number were observed for the bovine knee with intact marrow experiment at 400×400×500 µm3. The correlations between structural indices and T2* gradually decreased as the imaging voxel size increased (Figure 3A). However, T2 maintained robust correlations with trabecular spacing and number (Figure 3B).
1. De Santis, S., et al., In vitro and in vivo MR evaluation of internal gradient to assess trabecular bone density. Phys Med Biol, 2010. 55(19): p. 5767-85.
2. Capuani, S., et al., Characterization of trabecular bone by dipolar demagnetizing field MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2001. 46(4): p. 683-9.
3. Hwang, S.N. and F.W. Wehrli, Experimental evaluation of a surface charge method for computing the induced magnetic field in trabecular bone. J Magn Reson, 1999. 139(1): p. 35-45.
4. Rebuzzi, M., et al., Potential diagnostic role of the MRI-derived internal magnetic field gradient in calcaneus cancellous bone for evaluating postmenopausal osteoporosis at 3T. Bone, 2013. 57(1): p. 155-63.
5. Cho, H., et al., Visualization of inhomogeneous local magnetic field gradient due to susceptibility contrast. J Magn Reson, 2009. 198(1): p. 88-93.
6. Sigmund, E.E., H. Cho, and Y.Q. Song, High-resolution MRI of internal field diffusion-weighting in trabecular bone. NMR in Biomedicine, 2009. 22(4): p. 436-448.
7. Sigmund, E.E., et al., Diffusion-based MR methods for bone structure and evolution. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2008. 59(1): p. 28-39.
8. Pathak, A.P., B.D. Ward, and K.M. Schmainda, A novel technique for modeling susceptibility-based contrast mechanisms for arbitrary microvascular geometries: the finite perturber method. Neuroimage, 2008. 40(3): p. 1130-1143.
9. Dougherty, R. and K.-H. Kunzelmann, Computing local thickness of 3D structures with ImageJ. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 2007. 13(S02): p. 1678.
10. Hildebrand, T. and P. Rüegsegger, A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images. Journal of microscopy, 1997. 185(1): p. 67-75.
11. Doube, M., et al., BoneJ: free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. Bone, 2010. 47(6): p. 1076-1079.
Table 1. The magnetic resonance acquisition parameters for preclinical (defatted human trabecular sample) and clinical (ex vivo bovine knee) experiments via 7T magnetic resonance imaging.
TR, pulse repetition time; TE, echo-time; UTE, ultra-short echo-time; MSME, multi-slice multi-echo; MEGE, 3-dimensional multi-echo gradient echo.