Model-based analysis of CEST MRI is a robust quantitative method, however, the lengthy acquisition and processing times make it less clinically feasible. It has recently been proposed that partial acquisition of Z-spectra provides a faster approach, but at the cost of increased variability and large alterations in baseline Amide Proton Transfer (APT) effect. Here we present a refined approach, accounting for magnetisation transfer effects, which reduces acquisition and processing times and also decreases variability in the data. We demonstrate its ability to detect pathological reductions in the APT effect in both preclinical and clinical cohorts of acute ischaemic stroke respectively.
Preclinical: Data from a middle cerebral artery occlusion model of ischaemic stroke were retrospectively analysed2. In brief, focal ischaemia was induced in six Wistar rats, and MRI immediately performed using a 9.4T system (Agilent) with 72mm volume-transmit and 4-channel surface-receive array (Rapid Biomedical). APT MRI was performed with 50 Gaussian pulses (40ms duration, 184° FA, 50% duty cycle, equivalent continuous wave saturation power 0.55µT) across 51 saturation frequencies (-300-300 ppm, Fig.1A) and SE-EPI readout (TR/TE =5s/27.2ms). T1 and T2 maps were acquired using IR-EPI (TR/TE=10s/27.22ms, 9TIs:0.013-8s) and SE-EPI (TR=5s, 10 TEs:30-160ms) sequences. DWI (TR/TE=3s/27.2ms, 3 directions, b=0/1000s/mm2) and multi-phase pCASL (8 phases 0-315°, tag thickness 6.2mm, TR/TE/PLD=4s/12.4ms/550ms, bolus duration 1.4s) were acquired for identification of perfusion-diffusion mismatch. Images were acquired with 0.5x0.5x1mm3 resolution across 10 slices.
Clinical: Published data from 8 patients with ischaemic stroke (6F/2M, 73±16 years) were retrospectively analysed4. MRI was performed at 3T (Siemens Verio) within 12 hours of symptom onset according to research protocols approved by the UK National Research Ethics Service committee. APT MRI data were acquired in a single slice (3×3×5mm3 resolution), with TR/TE=5000/28 ms, with 2D-EPI readout. Clinical APT MRI preparation followed the same protocol as preclinical acquisition, except it was only acquired at 32 offsets (Fig.1). DWI, PCASL, FLAIR and MPRAGE were also acquired for infarct localisation and co-registration as previously described4.
Analysis: Saturation frequency offsets were retrospectively reduced to 16 (Reduced Frequency Offset, RFO) (Fig.1). Model-based analysis was performed using FSL’s BayCEST3,5. Reference methods consisted of analysing full Z-spectra, assuming a 3-pool exchange model (water, amide, and magnetisation transfer + Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement). T1 and T2 values were initialised on a voxelwise basis for preclinical analsysis6, and on a global basis for clinical analysis (in absence of T1/T2 maps). RFO analysis assumed an alternative 3-pool model (water, amide, magnetisation transfer), with T1 and T2 initialised globally. To assess the dependence of model-based analysis results on T1 and T2, preclinical data were also analysed using voxelwise values of: (1) T1 and T2; (2) T1 only; and (3) T2 only. APTR* was calculated using fitted parameters as previously described1,3,5. Masks for ischaemic core and contralateral normal tissue were created from ADC and CBF maps in MATLAB, as previously outlined4,7,8. RFO performance was assessed using APTR* contrast (APTR*Ischaemic/APTR*Contralateral), coefficient of variation (CV) in APTR* of contralateral tissue, and APTR* contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR ((APTR*Contralateral–APTR*Ischaemic)/σContralateral). Differences were assessed using a Student’s t-test, with statistical significance defined as p<0.05.
This work was funded by the Oxford Cancer Imaging Centre, Cancer Research UK, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Programme, the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network, and the Dunhill Medical Trust
[1] Tee et al., Comparing Different Analysis Methods for Quantifying the Amide Proton Transfer (APT) Effect in Hyperacute Stroke Patients. NMR in Biomed., 2014, 27:1019-1029
[2] Croal et al., Model-Based Analysis of Partial Z-spectra for Rapid Quantification of Amide Proton Transfer MRI. Proc. ISMRM, 2017, #3779
[3] Chappell et al., Quantitative Bayesian Model-Based Analysis of Amide Proton Transfer MRI. MRM., 2013, 70:556-567.
[4] Harston et al., Identifying the Ischaemic Penumbra using pH-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Brain. 2015; 138: 36-42.
[5] Chappell MA, Groves AR, Whitcher B, Woolrich MW. Variational Bayesian Inference for a Nonlinear Forward Model. IEEE Trans Signal Process., 2009, 223–236.
[6] Ray et al., Determination of an Optimally Sensitive and Specific Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI Quantification Metric in Relevant Biological Phantoms. NMR in Biomed., 2016, 29:1624-1633
[7] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/basil
[8] Larkin et al. Multiphase pCASL for Imaging Blood Flow in Rodent Brains, Proc. ISMRM, 2016, #5333
[9] Tee at al., Optimal Sampling Schedule for Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer. MRM., 2013, 70(5):1251-1262