John M. Irvine1, Laura Mariano1, Ben Rowland2, Huijun Liao 2, Kristin Heaton3, and Alexander P Lin2
1Draper, Cambridge, MA, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 3US Army Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA, United States
Synopsis
The objective of this study was to determine the
neurochemical biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and
posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among members of the military. A sample of
100 participants were assigned to each cohort (mTBI only, PTSD only, mTBI and
PTSD, military control, and civilian control). Analysis of metabolite
concentrations in the mTBI and PTSD cohorts showed significant metabolite
difference across 3 voxels in the brain (posterior cingulate gyrus (PCG), anterior
cingulate cortex (ACC), and posterior white matter (PWM)), indicating that magnetic
resonance spectroscopy provides objective biomarkers for distinguishing these
conditions.
PURPOSE
Post-Traumatic
Stress Disorder (PTSD) and mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) affect returning
soldiers from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom (OIF / OEF) at an
alarming rate. It is estimated that 11 - 28% of U.S. service members have
sustained mTBI1 and 10-18% experience PTSD2. Both mTBI
and PTSD are undetectable by traditional imaging methods and are traditionally
diagnosed from the clinical presentation, but have significant comorbidities
that make it difficult to distinguish between the two conditions. Our study focuses on magnetic resonance
spectroscopy (MRS) measurements to distinguish among healthy controlsubjects
and those with mTBI, PTSD, or both, with the goal of developing biomarkers from
the MRS data. The assessment of metabolite concentrations in the brain is
critical to understanding neurological disorders. MRS provides a non-invasive in vivo technique for measuring these
metabolites. METHODS
Participants and MRS data acquisition:
100 subjects were recruited and
comprise five classes: military personnel with mTBI only, PTSD only,
both mTBI and PTSD, or none (military control), and healthy civilian controls. This
study was performed in a Siemens 3T MAGNETOM Skyra scanner with a 32-channel
head coil. Single voxel MRS was acquired using conventional PRESS in three
different brain regions: Posterior Cingulate Gyrus (PCG; 20x20x20mm), Posterior
White Matter (PWM; 20x20x20mm), and Anterior Cingulate Gyrus (ACG; 20x20x20mm)
using TE = 30 ms, TR = 2 s, bandwidth = 1.2 kHz, 1024 complex data points,
water saturation, and 128 averaged acquisitions. Unsuppressed water spectrum
with the same parameters but without water suppression and 16 averages was also
collected. PRESS data was frequency corrected.
Analytic Methods: The processing
methods rely on a new approach for analyzing MRS signals that extracts a rich
set of wavelet-based features to enable development of a statistical
classifier. By capturing the structure of all significant peaks in the signal,
the wavelet-based method allows for the discovery of previously unknown
signatures that are not observed in traditional methods, such as LCModel3. The
post-acquisition processing consists of a series of algorithms operating
on the raw MRS signals to identify and correct signal quality issues, remove
the residual water signal, perform phase correction and baseline
removal, and compute the wavelet decomposition to represent the features
embedded in the signal (Figure 1). Feature extraction was performed on the
real-valued absorption spectra derived from the post-processed MRS spectra
using wavelets4 to extract features that are local to specific
intervals in the frequency domain.
Features were then evaluated using a combination of statistical criteria
to identify those statistically significant wavelet-based features that are
also least likely to be attributable to random effects (noise). This approach, therefore, isolates just those
features that are discriminating between the two groups, but also maximizes the
probability that the features are due to distinct biochemical differences
between the two groups. In each binary comparison, several wavelet-based
features were identified that met the thresholding criteria that screen
features. RESULTS
To demonstrate classification performance, we
performed 100 iterations of 5-fold cross-validation of a Linear Discriminant
Analysis classification method, using a Sequential Forward Selection (SFS)
scheme to identify optimal subsets of features for discriminating between the
classes. The following tables contain the average Percent Correct
Classification (PCC) from all iterations of the cross-validated SFS search for,
at most, the top 3 features it selected. The results show that classifiers
relying on the MRS signal can achieve high accuracy when distinguishing among
mTBI, PTSD, and military controls (Table 1). The specific metabolites depend on
the objective of the classifier (Figures 2 and 3). DISCUSSION
The
classifier performance provides strong evidence that concentrations of specific
metabolites, as measured from MRS, are objective biomarkers for mTBI and PTSD as
well as differentiating between civilian and military controls. Significant
features differentiating PTSD from control focus on creatine and myoinositol,
whereas distinguishing features between PTSD and TBI focused more on the
glutamate and glutamine region. These
differences in the critical metabolites across the 3 voxels suggest that
further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms associated
with PTSD and mTBI. In addition, fused analysis of the data across the voxels
has the potential improve the classifier performance and the robustness of the
corresponding biomarkers. CONCLUSION
The classification results suggest that MRS can identify
unique neuro-metabolite profiles for military service members with mTBI or PTSD
diagnoses and distinguish these subjects from controls. The ability of
MRS to distinguish small differences across many clinically useful metabolites
allows us to develop a clearer and quantifiable measure of mTBI and PTSD.Acknowledgements
This
study was funded by DOD CDMRP WX81-XWH-10-1-0835. The views expressed in this
abstract are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the
Department of Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.References
1. Moore J.B. et al, The Wounded Warrior Handbook: A
Resource Guide for Returning Veterans. Rowman & Littlefield Publishing
Group, Inc (2012)
2. Litz B and Schlenger W, PTSD in
Service Members and New Veterans of the Iraq and Afganistan Wars: A
Bibliography and Critique. National Center for PTSD (2009)
3. Provencher, Stephen W. "Estimation of metabolite
concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra." Magnetic
resonance in medicine 30.6 (1993): 672-679.
4. Daubechies, I.,
Ten lectures on wavelets. 1992: SIAM.