Karthik R Sreenivasan1, Zhengshi Yang1, Virendra Mishra1, Sarah Banks1, Dietmar Cordes1,2, and Charles Bernick1
1Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
Synopsis
Studies have shown that both active and retired athletes with repeated
head trauma are more likely to suffer from cognitive decline and loss of executive
and attention functions when compared to age- matched healthy controls. Our results show decreased functional connectivity in the active fighter
group when compared to controls between regions known to be implicated in traumatic
brain injury. Furthermore, we found a shift towards a
less efficient network topology with altered integration and segregation in active
professional fighters.
Introduction
Studies have shown that both active and retired athletes with repeated
head trauma are more likely to suffer from cognitive decline and loss of executive
and attention functions when compared to age- matched healthy controls [1,2]. The
professional fighters brain health study (PFBHS) is a longitudinal study of
active professional fighters [3]. In this study we use resting-state functional
connectivity and graph theory to determine how the topology of the network is
altered in active fighters with respect to healthy controls.Methods
18 boxers (28.72±7.38years) and 18 controls (29.16±8.57years) participating
in the PFBHS were included in this study. Scan was conducted in Siemens 3T
scanner (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) using 32 channel head coil. The following
MR parameters are used for resting state fMRI data acquisition; FOV=24×24 cm2
, matrix=128×128, flip angle = 80°, TR/TE = 2800 / 28ms, 4mm thickness, 30
slices. After standard preprocessing, mean time series were obtained from 90
ROIs based on the AAL atlas (excluding cerebellum and vermis). The connectivity
between two ROIs was estimated using Pearson’s correlation between their averaged
time-series, and subsequently a connectivity matrix (90 x 90) was obtained for
each subject. Two-sample t-tests were used to compare the functional
connectivity between the two groups regressing out age. In addition, these
connectivity matrices were used to study the topological properties of the
brain functional networks. Graph theory measures were obtained using GRETNA
toolbox [4]. Path-length (Lp), clustering coefficient (Cp), Global (GE) and
local efficiency (LE), were computed for each subject at various sparsity
thresholds (S 0.05-0.4, ∆S=0.01). Two-sample t-tests with age as covariate were
used to see if area under the curve for any of the above metrics were
significantly different between the two groups.Results
Fig.1 shows a set of 40 enhanced connections in control group comparing
with fighters, primarily comprising the putamen, hippocampus, frontal and
temporal lobe and few other regions. Results were visualized with the BrainNet Viewer
(http://www.nitrc.org/projects/bnv/) [4]. No paths were
significantly greater in the fighters. The evaluation of the AUC values
revealed significantly (p<<0.05) lower Lp (Fig. 2a) in the control group
when compared to fighters but the Cp was not significantly different between
the two groups. The area under the curve for GE (Fig. 2c) and LE (Fig. 2d) were
also significantly (p<<0.05) greater in the controls when compared to the
active fighters.Discussion and Conclusion
The current study revealed altered functional
connectivity and topological properties of networks in active fighters compared
to the healthy controls. Our results show decreased functional connectivity in
the active fighter group when compared to controls between regions known to be
implicated in traumatic brain injury. Furthermore, the fighter group showed a reduced
GE and LE and increased Lp when compared to controls. These observations point
to a shift towards a less efficient network topology with altered integration
and segregation in active professional fighters.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by COBRE 1P20GM109025 and
grants from Lincy foundation. We would like to extend our sincere thanks to all
the participants of the study, various research coordinators and MRI
technologists without which the study would not have been completed. We would
also like to thank Dr. Mark Lowe and Dr. Wanyong Shin from Cleveland Clinic for
their assistance in setting up the MRI protocols at our center.References
[1] McKee AC, Stern RA, Nowinski CJ, et al. The
spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain 2013; 136:
43–64.
[2] IR C, Siegel O, Sham R, EA C, Tarlau M, DiDomenico
A. Brain damage in modern boxers. JAMA 1984; 251: 2663–7.
[3] Bernick C, Banks S, Phillips M, et al.
Professional fighters brain health study: Rationale and methods. Am J Epidemiol
2013; 178: 280–6.
[4] Wang J, Wang X, Xia M, Liao X, Evans A and He Y
(2015), GRETNA: a graph theoretical network analysis toolbox for imaging
connectomics. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 30 June 2015 |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00386
[5] Xia M, Wang J, He Y (2013) BrainNet Viewer: A
Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics. PLoS ONE 8(7): e68910.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068910