Oliviero L. Gobbo1,2, Aislinn Mc Phillips1, Tara Hamilton2, Jerrard Hayes2, and Gavin Davey2
1School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 2School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Synopsis
The blood brain barrier (BBB) is a
complex structure that separates brain interstitial fluid from blood. BBB
dysfunction is a key feature of Central Nervous System diseases. This in vivo study examines the effects of Intravenous
Immunoglobulin (IVIg), regularly used to treat immune and inflammatory diseases, on BBB function following LPS-induced
BBB disruption. The change in permeability of the BBB was
evaluated by MRI, using gadolinium. Our results suggest that LPS breach the integrity of the BBB with
regional specificity and can be
reversed by IVIg
administration.
Introduction
The
blood-brain barrier (BBB) forms a protective barrier, with the important
function of maintaining brain homeostasis. Neuro-inflammation disrupts BBB
integrity either during initiation and/or progression of many neurological
diseases such as, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease
and schizophrenia1. While BBB disruption contributes to the pathogenesis of
many CNS diseases, it may be that the disease-induced alterations seen in BBB
permeability may affect the treatment of these diseases2.
Intravenous
immunoglobulin (IVIg) is used to treat immune and inflammatory diseases3. It is
becoming a widely used treatment option for peripheral neuropathologies, such
as Guillain-Barré syndrome. Since neuro-inflammation is known to cause BBB
disruption, the potential of IVIg as a treatment for neurological diseases
needs further investigation.
The
goal of the study was to investigate the effect of IVIg in BBB disruption.
Lipopolysaccaride (LPS) is a potent toxin and plays a role in the initiation of
the inflammatory cascade. It causes a disruption in the BBB by binding to
toll-like receptor 4 receptors on the surface of endothelial cells4. The change
in permeability of the BBB was evaluated by MRI using gadolinium as a contrast
agent.
Method
The experimental protocols employed in this
study were approved by the local Animal Research Ethics Committee and HPRA
(Ireland), in accordance with the EU Directive (2010/63/EU). The mice were
categorized into 4 groups: Mice were injected with saline (n=6) or 1mg/kg LPS
(n=4) i.p. 3 hours prior to MRI scanning or mice were injected with saline
(n=3) or 1mg/kg LPS (n=6) i.p. 3 hours prior to scanning and then with 1.5g/kg
IVIg one hour post administration of LPS. BBB integrity was assessed in vivo
using a dedicated small rodent 7T MRI Bruker system. Images of the brain were
visualised using T1 weighted 2D MRI sequence before and following
administration of 100µl of a 170 mmol solution of Magnevist administered via a
tail vein catheter. The parameters for this T1 flash sequence were; average:
10, repetition: 1, echo time: 7ms, repetition time: 4443.985 ms, scan time: 18
min 56 sec 600 ms, flip angle: 30 degrees, slices: 25, slice orientation:
axial, read orientation: Le-Rt, slice thickness: 0.250mm, matrix: 384x384,
field of view: 20x20mm2, pixel resolution: 52 µm/pixel. Coronal orientated
slices for pre-injection and for post-injection of gadolinium from each mouse
were saved and analysed with freeware medical image analysis software, MIPAV.
Regions of interests (ROIs) were selected for each image depending on the
structures present in that particular slice. Seven structures of the mouse
brain were studied including the cortical regions: Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR)
and percentage difference SNR were calculated using the equation: SNR (%) =
[(post Gd – pre-Gd)/(pre-Gd)]*100. Statistical significance was assessed by a
one-way Anova and Tukey’s post hoc test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.Results
A single dose of LPS 1mg/kg was chosen because
it has been shown to increase the permeability of the BBB 1 hour after
administration in mice5. The MRI scans were taken 3 hours post-injection of
LPS, so it is possible that the permeability of the BBB peaked after one hour
and had begun its repair to the natural state by the time the MRI scans were
taken. LPS does not cause a disruption to the BBB in every regions of the mouse
brain. No significant difference in SNR can be seen between the control group
and LPS 1mg/kg group for the lateral ventricles, sensory cortex, motor cortex
and caudate Putamen. However, there is a significant difference for the visual
cortex, hippocampus and APTD (striatum). In these 3 regions, the administration
of 1.5g/kg of IVIg has reduced the permeability of the BBB to gadolinium in our
conditions. Discussion and Conclusion
A
dose of 1mg/kg LPS in mice causes an increase in the BBB permeability in the
visual cortex, hippocampus and APTD (striatum). However, the BBB is relatively
resistant to LPS-induced disruption in the lateral ventricle, sensory cortex,
motor cortex and caudate putamen. Furthermore, 1.5 g/kg of IVIg has partially
restored the integrity of the BBB that was compromised with the administration
of LPS. These results suggest that LPS breaches the integrity of the BBB with
regional specificity. Given that LPS can disrupt the BBB in the visual cortex
and APTD, it is worth investigating in future experiments if a higher dose of
LPS will disrupt the BBB in the other regions. It is also worth investigating
if the use of a smaller contrasting agent such as manganese will allow for
better visualisation of BBB disruption in these resistant LPS-induced
disruption regions.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1- Stolp et al. Neuropathol
Appl Neurobiol. 2009 Apr;35(2):132-46.
2- Lochhead et al. AAPS journal,
2017;19(4):910-20.
3- Misra
et al. J Neurol. 2005;252 Suppl 1:I1-6.
4- Diamond et al. Nat Rev
Immunol. 2009;9(6):449-56.
5- Jungula et al. Neurosci Lett. 2013 Sep
13;551:23-7.