Sarah L Hurrell1, Sean McGarry2, Elizabeth Cochran3, Jennifer Connelly4, Scott Rand1, Wade Mueller5, and Peter S LaViolette1
1Radiology, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 2The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 3Pathology, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 4Neurology, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 5Neurosurgery, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
Synopsis
Multiparametric MRI radiomic profiles (RPs) of de novo
glioblastoma (GBM) brain tumors have been shown to predict patient prognosis prior
to treatment. This study compares prognostic RPs to predictive maps of tumor cellularity
derived from radiological-pathological (rad-path) correlation to determine the
convergence of both imaging biomarkers. We find that RPs associated with poor
prognosis co-localize with high cellularity, both predicted and pathologically
confirmed in 6 patients assessed at autopsy.
INTRODUCTION
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and fatal central
nervous system tumor in adults, even despite recent therapeutical advancements1.
GBM is a highly diffuse and
heterogeneous tumor leading to difficulty in correctly defining tumor margins
on clinical imaging2.
Recent advances in image processing have determined imaging signatures, or radiomic
profiles (RPs), in GBM patients associated decreased overall survival (OS) prior
to treatment3. Other imaging biomarker advances have led to predictive
maps of tumor cellularity based on rad-path training datasets from post-mortem
whole-brain tissue samples4. This study combines these
two techniques to determine the RP most strongly associated with hypercellular
tumor.METHODS
Six patients with post-mortem whole brain tissue
samples available for study were included in this analysis. The patient’s final
MRI scan prior to death was analyzed To create RPs, four image contrasts (T1, ADC,
T1+C, and FLAIR) were co-registered to one another and intensity normalized. Each contrast was then segmented into 3
distinct intensity categories, bright, middle, and dark. Next, each image voxel
was assigned a 4-digit code representing the brightness category for each contrast
(Figure 1). Whole brain tissue samples were sliced in the same orientation as
the final MRI scan using patient specific 3D-printed slicing jigs5. Collected tissue was H&E stained, digitized,
and then quantitatively segmented to separate cells. The samples were then aligned
with MR imaging using custom software5,6. Voxel information was extracted and used to
train a partial least squares regression model, which was then applied to the
entire to create MRI-resolution maps of cellularity. Next, the 5 RPs predictive of OS3 were compared to these cellularity maps to find
regions of complete overlap between a single profile and hypercellularity. Finally, tissue samples from regions
containing the RP in question were pathologically analyzed. RESULTS
RP 3133, representing bright T1, dark ADC, bright
T1+C, and bright FLAIR, was found to be predictive of poor OS and hypercellular
tumor according to PiCT maps of cellularity and pathologist analysis in all 6
patients. Other profiles were associated
with a mix of hypercellularity and hypocellular conditions or in the case of RP
1213 mostly low to normal levels of cellularity. Figure 3 shows a comparison of
RP 3133 and RP 2133 when overlaid with cellularity maps. Figure 4 shows the
pathological validation step with a sample from one patient that contains RP
3133.DISCUSSION:
This study validates two imaging biomarkers of infiltrative
glioblastoma, radiomic profiles associated with poor prognosis, and predictive
maps of tumor cellularity. These convergent results suggest that both imaging
techniques are sensitive to tumor invasion beyond margins traditionally defined
by conventional imaging and should be considered when planning treatment. More
research is necessary to generalize these findings beyond this limited dataset.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that radiomic profiles and PiCT maps of tumor
cellularity provide complimentary imaging biomarkers sensitive to invisible
glioblastoma cell invasion. This technology may improve patient treatment in
the future. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et
al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central
Nervous System: a summary. Acta
Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803-820.
2. Parsons
DW, Jones S, Zhang X, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human
glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321(5897):1807-1812.
3. McGarry
SD, Hurrell SL, Kaczmarowski AL, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based
Radiomic Profiles Predict Patient Prognosis in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Before Therapy. Tomography. 2016;2(3):223-228.
4. Hurrell
SL, Cochran E, McGarry S, et al. Predictive cytological topography, a
radiopathomics approach, highlights regions of pathologically confirmed
non-enhancing hypercellular tumor in glioblastoma patients at autopsy. Proc. International Society for Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, Annual Meeting Honolulu, HI. 2017.
5. Nguyen
HS, Milbach N, Hurrell SL, et al. Progressing Bevacizumab-Induced Diffusion
Restriction Is Associated with Coagulative Necrosis Surrounded by Viable Tumor
and Decreased Overall Survival in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016.
6. LaViolette
PS, Mickevicius NJ, Cochran EJ, et al. Precise ex vivo histological validation
of heightened cellularity and diffusion-restricted necrosis in regions of dark
apparent diffusion coefficient in 7 cases of high-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16(12):1599-1606.