Olya Stringfield1,2, Mahmoud Abdalah1,2, Sandra Johnston3,4, Nicolas Rognin2, Yoganand Balagurunathan2, John Arrington5, Kristin Swanson3, Kathleen M. Egan6, Robert A. Gatenby5, and Natarajan Raghunand2
1Image Response Assessment Team Core, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States, 2Department of Cancer Imaging & Metabolism, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States, 3Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States, 4Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States, 5Department of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States, 6Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
Synopsis
We retrospectively analyzed pre-treatment MR scans in two
cohorts diagnosed with Glioblastoma. The Long-Term Survival (LTS) group
survived >36 months post-diagnosis, while the Short-Term Survival (STS)
group survived ≤18 months. The discovery cohort included 22 LTS patients and 22
STS patients and the validation cohort consisted of 15 patients, each. Tumor
voxels were clustered on post-contrast T1w and FLAIR sequences into 6 distinct
“habitats”. Radiomic features were extracted from both sequences. The
enhancement value on T1w and fraction of Habitat 6 (high signal on T1w and
FLAIR) were significantly higher in the LTS groups compared to the STS groups.
PURPOSE
We retrospectively analyzed pre-treatment MRI scans in two
cohorts of patients diagnosed with Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). The Long Term
Survival (LTS) group included 22 patients who survived > 36 months post
diagnosis and the Short Term Survival (STS) group included 22 patients who
survived ≤ 19 months. We computed radiomic image features within a volume
encompassing the contrast-enhancing portion of the tumor in each subject. Our
study hypothesis is that there are innate differences in tumor aggressiveness
and responsiveness to therapy that are present at diagnosis in gliomas of
patients in the two groups (LTS vs.
STS), and these differences manifest as sub-visual features on standard MRI
images that can be quantified using radiomics1. The overall objective
is to develop a non-invasive prognostic marker to drive personalized therapy in
GBM.METHODS
Following IRB approval, we defined patient cohorts with
pathologically confirmed primary GBM who had available pre-operative T2-weighted
Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), T2-weighted (T2W), and T1-weighted
pre- and post-contrast scans acquired at diagnosis. The discovery cohort
comprised patients retrospectively identified from the database at a single
institution (n=22, both LTS and STS
groups). The validation cohort comprised subjects who were identified
retrospectively from the ENDURES multi-institutional database (n=15, both LTS and STS groups). For each
patient, FLAIR and T1W pre- and post-contrast images were co-registered to T2W
images. A volume of interest (VOI) was manually delineated around the contrast
enhancing margin on post-contrast T1W images for each tumor. Normal white matter
and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regions were automatically segmented using a multiparametric
MRI clustering approach, and the mean voxel intensity values within these two
regions were used to linearly calibrate voxel intensities on T2W, FLAIR and T1W
pre-contrast images. T1W post-contrast images were calibrated as the associated
T1W pre-contrast images. Voxels within the tumor from all patients in the discovery
cohort were pooled and clustered by Otsu method2 into three levels
of contrast enhancement: low, medium and high. These three clusters were
further sub-divided on the basis of FLAIR intensity being above or below mean
calibrated FLAIR intensity in normal white matter, for a total of 6 “habitats”3.
Radiomic features were extracted from FLAIR and T1w post-contrast sequences
using a pipeline developed and validated in accordance with Image Biomarker Standardisation
Initiative4. Student’s t-test
was used to test for differences in the radiomic features and habitat volumes
between the LTS and STS groups. Survival analyses were performed using
Kaplan-Meier survival curves and statistical significance was computed using the
log-rank test. For Kaplan-Meier analysis, radiomic features and habitat volumes
were dichotomized into two groups using the median score value from the
discovery cohort.RESULTS
Tumor voxels were clustered by the calibrated and normalized
signal intensities on post-contrast T1w and FLAIR sequences into 6 distinct
“habitats” based on low-medium-high contrast enhancement and low-high signal on
FLAIR scans. In the discovery cohort
Habitat 6 (high enhancement + high FLAIR) comprised a significantly higher tumor
volume in LTS compared with STS (Figure 1A). This finding was replicated in the
validation cohort (Figure 1B). Of the radiomic features calculated on the tumor
VOI on the FLAIR and T1W post-contrast images, 90th percentile of intensity4
(computed on T1w post-contrast) was significantly different between the LTS and
STS groups in both the discovery (p=0.039) and validation (p=0.049) cohorts. The
feature captured the value at the 90th percentile of intensities
within the tumor VOI. For survival analyses, median score of the feature in the
discovery cohort was used to dichotomize the patients in both discovery and
validation cohorts. Based on the median split, the feature was associated with
overall survival in both discovery (p=0.023) and validation (p=0.009) cohorts
(Figure 2). In both discovery and validation cohorts the calibrated T1W
post-contrast intensity value at the 90th percentile was higher in tumors
from the LTS group than in the STS group.CONCLUSIONS
Habitat analysis by multispectral clustering within the
tumor VOI on MRI images acquired at diagnosis of GBM reveals a correlation
between the presence of Habitat 6 (high enhancement + high FLAIR signal) and
survival beyond 36 months post-diagnosis. Further, radiomic analysis shows that,
in both the discovery and validation cohorts, the calibrated intensity of contrast
enhancement at the 90th percentile was significantly higher in LTS
subjects compared with STS subjects at diagnosis. We are exploring the
hypothesis that these findings indicate a greater presence of immune
infiltrates in the tumor in long term survivors of GBM at diagnosis.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Gillies, R. J., Kinahan, P. E., Hricak, H.
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology, 278:563-77,
2016.
2.
Gatenby, R. A., Grove, O., Gillies, R. J. Quantitative
imaging in cancer evolution and ecology. Radiology, 269:8-15, 2013.
3.
Otsu, N. A threshold selection method from
gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernetics, 9:62-66, 1979.
4.
Zwanenburg, A., Leger, S., Vallières, M. and
Löck, S. Image biomarker standardisation initiative - feature definitions. In
eprint arXiv:1612.07003, 2016.