Alexander P. Lin1, Min Zhou1, Huijun Liao1, and Raymond Huang1
1Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Previous studies have reported the utility of 2-hydroxyglutarate
magnetic resonance spectroscopy (2HG MRS) in diagnosing isocitrate
dehydrogenase (IDH) status, which is
of great value for patient management. We determined the optimal thresholds of single
voxel spectroscopy (SVS) and chemical shift imaging (CSI) 2HG MRS in
differentiating IDH-mutant gliomas
from non-IDH-mutant controls, and
then determined the diagnostic accuracy in two prospective cohorts of patients.
We show that 2HG MRS provided diagnostic utility for IDH-mutant gliomas both preoperatively and at time of suspected
tumor recurrence. Our findings may
provide guidance for devising optimal MRS imaging protocol tailored to specific
clinical settings.
Background
More than 80% of lower-grade gliomas (WHO grade II and
III) and secondary glioblastomas harbor IDH
mutations, leading to a more favorable prognosis1-3. Mutant IDHs result
in accumulation of oncometabolite 2HG in IDH-mutated
gliomas4. Recent advances in
MRS technique have demonstrated that the signal of the oncometabolite 2HG can
be measured in vivo using an echo
time of 97 ms using both single voxel spectroscopy (SVS) and chemical shift
imaging (CSI) methods5. However
it is unclear what is the optimal threshold for 2HG detection and how it may be
affected by these different methods in pre-operative and post-operative
conditions. These are all important
issues that would impact the clinical implementation of this methodology. Therefore, our goal is to optimize the
threshold in a retrospective cohort of patients for each method in
differentiating IDH-mutant gliomas
from non-IDH-mutant controls, and
then validate them in two prospective cohorts of 1) preoperative patients
presenting with unknown brain mass, and 2) postoperative patients with known IDH-mutation status presenting with
suspected recurrence to determine the diagnostic value of 2HG MRS under these
two clinically relevant settings.Methods
All MRI and MRS exams were performed on one clinical 3.0 T
MRI scanner (Siemens TIM Skyra, Erlangen, Germany) with a 32-channel head coil. SVS was acquired using PRESS TR/TE = 2000/97
ms, 128 averages, voxel size of 2x2x2 cm3. CSI was acquired using a semi-LASER sequence
with TR/TE = 1700/97 ms, 160x160 cm2 field of view, 16x16 matrix,
slice width of 15 cm, 3 averages, and weighted acquisition. The region of interest was localized on 3D
FLAIR images to include as much of the lesion as possible while avoiding the surrounding
tissue. Localized shimming was performed
by adjustment of first- and second-order shim gradients using the automatic
three-dimensional B0 field mapping technique followed by manual adjustment of the
above-mentioned shim gradients to achieve a magnitude peak width of water at
half-maximum of 14 Hz or less for SVS and 25Hz for CSI. All data was then processed using LCmodel
(ver 6.2) using a custom basis that included 2HG and 20 metabolites. Signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio and full width at
half maximum (FWHM) were used to assess the quality of the data. For CSI, the median
and 75th percentile 2HG/Cr values of the selected voxels were then calculated
for each subject. The post-processing was done without the knowledge of the
patient IDH status which was determined using immunohistochemistry. The patient cohort consisted 1) discovery
cohort (n=39) consisting of postoperative residual or recurrent glioma
retrospectively identified from patients who had MRS, 2) prospective preoperative
validation cohort (n=23), and 3) prospective recurrent-lesion validation cohort
(n=15).Results
The optimal thresholds of 2HG/Cr in SVS and 75th percentile
CSI for IDH mutations were 0.11 and 0.23, respectively (Figure 1). When applied
to the validation sets, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in
distinguishing IDH-mutant gliomas in the preoperative cohort were 83.33%,
100.00% and 93.33% for SVS, and 100.00%, 66.67% and 80.00% for CSI,
respectively. In the recurrent-lesion cohort, the sensitivity, specificity and
accuracy for discriminating IDH-positive recurrent gliomas were 50.00%, 42.86%
and 45.45% for SVS, and 66.67%, 100.00% and 84.62% for CSI, respectively.Discussion
The threshold for SVS is similar to previous studies that
reported a concentration of >1mM assuming that the ratio to creatine is
approximately 8-10mM. The ratio of
2HG/Cr was used in order to accurately compare with CSI results which lacked a
water reference due to its high cost in time and therefore normalized to
creatine. In the pre-operative cohort,
SVS performed quite well which is likely due to more homogeneous tumors that
are not affected by treatment whereas CSI did not perform as well, likely due
to the lower overall SNR as shown in Figure 2.
However in the post-operative group, SVS methods did not perform as well
whereas CSI appeared to perform better (Figure 3). Due to the larger spatial coverage and
multi-voxel acquisition, the CSI has the advantage of accounting for the
spatial heterogeneity of the abnormal tissues including gliosis, edema, and
tumor which commonly co-exist in the post-treatment setting. Therefore
utilization of the two methodologies appears to differ based on the clinical
situation. It would appear the most
efficient use would be to acquire both SVS and CSI in all cases.Conclusion
2HG MRS provides diagnostic utility for IDH-mutant gliomas
both preoperatively and at time of suspected tumor recurrence. Diagnostic performance is dependent on
treatment status where the ideal protocol would include both SVS and CSI for
maximal diagnostic efficacy.Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Institute for
the Neurosciences Seed Grant and the ARRS/ASNR Scholar Award. The authors would
like to thank the China Scholarship Council for financial support.References
1. Eckel-Passow JE, Lachance DH, Molinaro AM, et al.
Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors. The New England journal of medicine. 2015; 372(26):2499-2508.
2. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Brat DJ, Verhaak
RG, et al. Comprehensive, Integrative Genomic Analysis of Diffuse Lower-Grade
Gliomas. The New England journal of
medicine. 2015; 372(26):2481-2498.
3. Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. The
New England journal of medicine. 2009; 360(8):765-773.
4. Dang L, White DW, Gross S, et al. Cancer-associated
IDH1 mutations produce
2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature. 2009;
462(7274):739-744.
5. Choi C, Ganji SK, DeBerardinis RJ, et al.
2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with gliomas. Nature medicine. 2012; 18(4):624-629.