Yilan Xu1, Dongye Li2,3, Zhuozhao Zheng1, Chun Yuan2,4, and Xihai Zhao2
1Department of Radiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, China, 3Center for Brain Disorders Research, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China, 4Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
Synopsis
This study
investigated the correlation between intracranial artery atherosclerotic
disease and the integrity of communicating arteries in circle of Willis in
symptomatic patients using MR imaging. We found that the intracranial artery
stenosis was significantly associated with presence of anterior and posterior
communicating arteries. Our findings suggest that the intracranial artery
stenosis might be an independent indicator for the integrity of circle of Willis.
Our data also suggest that, with the progression of intracranial artery
stenosis, collateral circulation tends to be integrated from the anterior to
posterior communicating arteries.
Introduction and Purpose:
In Chinese population, intracranial artery
atherosclerotic disease is one of the major causes of ischemic stroke
[1]. Circle
of Willis (CoW) is considered to be the first level of collateral circulation
which can compensate cerebral blood flow when cerebrovascular atherosclerotic
stenosis is present. The integrity of CoW, representing the capability of
compensation, was found to be associated with severity of ischemic stroke
[2-4].
We hypothesized that intracranial artery atherosclerotic disease may stimulate
the communicating arteries to integrate bilateral circulations with progression
of intracranial atherosclerotic disease.
This
study sought to investigate the correlation between intracranial artery atherosclerotic disease and the integrity of communicating arteries in CoW in symptomatic patients using MR imaging.Methods
Study
sample: Patients with
recent cerebrovascular symptoms in anterior circulation were recruited. All the patients
underwent MR vessel wall imaging for intracranial arteries. The study protocol
was approved by institutional review board and written consent form was
obtained from each patient. MR imaging: The MR imaging
was performed on a 3.0T MR scanner (Achieva TX, Phillips Healthcare) with custom-designed
36-channel neurovascular coil. The MR imaging parameters were as follows: 3D MERGE:
fast field echo (FFE), repeat time (TR)/echo time (TE) 9.2/4.3 ms, flip angle
6°, field of view (FOV) 4.0×16×25 cm3, and spatial resolution 0.8×0.8×0.8
mm3; 3D T1-VISTA: turbo spin echo, TR/TE 700/21 ms, FOV 4.5×20×20 cm3,
and spatial resolution 0.6×0.6×0.6 mm3; 3D TOF: FFE, TR/TE 25/3.5 ms,flip angle 20°,
FOV 4.5×20×20 cm3, and spatial resolution 0.7×0.7×1.4 mm3. Imaging
review: Two experienced radiologists interpreted the MR images with
consensus. Presence/absence, maximum wall thickness (Max WT), and stenosis of intracranial
artery atherosclerotic plaque were determined. Luminal stenosis was measured on
the maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of TOF MRA. Presence/absence of A1
segment of bilateral anterior cerebral arteries (ACA), anterior
communicating artery (ACoA), P1 segment of bilateral posterior cerebral
arteries (PCA) and bilateral posterior communicating arteries (PCoA)
was evaluated. Statistical analysis: The Max WT and stenosis of
intracranial plaques were compared between patients with and without ACoA or
PCoA using non-parametric Mann-whitney test. The association between
intracranial plaque features and presence of ACoA and PCoA was analyzed with
logistic regression. Results
Of 110 patients (mean age: 57.2±11.1 years, 72 males), 51 (46.4%) and 44 (40%) had atherosclerotic plaques and stenosis in intracranial arteries,
respectively. For integrity of CoW, we found that 100 (90.9%) had bilateral A1, 92 (83.6%) had bilateral P1, 91 (82.7%)
had ACoA, and 58 (52.7%) had PCoA. For patients with both bilateral A1 and P1
(n=85), the intracranial stenosis in patients with ACoA was significantly
greater than that of those without ACoA (19.7%±21.7% vs. 1.4%±3.3%, p=0.046).
For patients with bilateral A1, P1 and ACoA (n=79), the intracranial
stenosis in patients with PCoA was significantly greater than that of those
without PCoA (27.9 %±23.7% vs. 13.5%±17.9%, p=0.007). Figure 1 represents an example for a patient with severe intracranial artery stenosis and bilateral
A1, P1, ACoA, and PCoA. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds
ratio (OR) of intracranial stenosis was 1.177 (95% CI, 1.051-1.317; p=0.005)
with increment of 5% in predicting presence of PCoA in patients with bilateral
A1, P1 and ACoA. After adjusted for confounding
factors of gender, body mass index, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia, this association remained statistically significant (OR, 1.282; 95%
CI, 1.019-1.613; p=0.034). For 48 patients who had ACoA and intracranial
plaques, the Max WT of intracranial plaques was similar in patients with and
without PCoA (2.2±0.8mm vs. 2.2±0.7mm, p=0.748). Discussion and Conclusion
In the present
study, intracranial artery stenosis was found to be significantly associated
with presence of ACoA in patients with bilateral A1 and P1. In addition, we
found that intracranial artery stenosis was significantly associated with
presence of PCoA in patients with bilateral A1, P1 and ACoA. Our findings suggest that the intracranial
artery stenosis might be an independent indicator for integrity of circle of
Willis. Our data also suggest that, with the progression of intracranial artery
stenosis, collateral circulation tends to be integrated from the anterior to
posterior communicating arteries. Acknowledgements
None.References
1. Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L,
et al. Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial
large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: the Chinese Intracranial
Atherosclerosis (CICAS) Study. Stroke.
2014;45:663-669.
2. Routsonis KG, Stamboulis E, Christodoulaki M.
Anomalies of the circle of Willis and atherosclerosis. Vasc Surg.
1973;7:141-145.
3. Hartkamp MJ, van Der
Grond J, van Everdingen KJ, et al. Circle of Willis collateral flow
investigated by magnetic resonance
angiography. Stroke. 1999;30:2671-2678.
4. Gutierrez
J, Rosoklija G, Murray J, et al. A quantitative perspective to the study of
brain arterial remodeling of donors with and without HIV in the Brain Arterial
Remodeling Study (BARS). Front Physiol. 2014;5:56.