Milanka Visser1, Thomas Lillicrap1, Carlos Garcia-Esperon1, Bénédicte Maréchal2, Mark Parsons1, Christopher Levi1, and Andrew Bivard1
1Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, 2Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
Synopsis
Debilitating
fatigue is the most common consequence of stroke, however there are
no known clinical or radiological biomarkers associated with post-stroke fatigue. We assessed differences in regional brain volumes
obtained from T1-weighted, high-resolution structural scans between
stroke survivors with and without severe fatigue. Differences were
observed in the volume of the globus pallidus and putamen, as well as the
ipsilesional temporal, parietal and frontal lobe. The mentioned
morphological differences between stroke survivors with and without
severe fatigue have also been reported in multiple sclerosis and
Parkinson’s-related fatigue, suggesting a possible common
mechanism.
Introduction
Debilitating
fatigue is one of the most common consequences of stroke and is
experienced by approximately 40% of stroke survivors1. Previous
studies have shown that there is no link between baseline stroke
severity, stroke location, or the resulting disability at predicting
the onset of fatigue. In the present study, we aimed at using
comprehensive radiological assessments to identify if there were
differences between fatigued and non-fatigued stroke survivors in
terms of morphometry or functional connectivity.Methods
Stroke
survivors were recruited from stroke clinics by neurologists at the
John Hunter Hospital, NSW, Australia. Included participants had a
history of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke more than 3 months prior to
inclusion. Self-reported fatigue was assessed using the
multidimensional fatigue (MFI) scale. Severe fatigue was defined as
an MFI ≥ 60, and low fatigue as ≤ 50. Participants underwent a
multi-modal scanning session in which a structural multi-echo MPRAGE
(MEMPRAGE) with a 1mm-isotropic resolution and a functional
resting-state EPI (3mm isotropic, 250 volumes over 10 minutes) at 3T
(MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Images of
participants with left-hemispheric strokes were flipped, such that
data could be presented in terms of ipsilesional and contralesional
values. MEMPRAGE data were processed using the fully automated
MorphoBox prototype2. Resulting brain volumes for low- and
severe-fatigue groups were compared using independent t-tests with
bootstrapping or the Mann-Whitney U test (using a significance level
of 0.05) with results presented with and without correction for total
intracranial volume (cTIV). Regions-of-interest (ROIs) for a
seed-based inter-hemispheric functional connectivity assessment were
chosen from regions that were found to be significantly different
from the severely fatigued and low fatigued volumetric analysis.
Resting-state data were analyzed in the Nipype framework and were
despiked (AFNI), slice-time corrected (SPM), motion corrected using
the 24-parameter model3 and registered to MNI-space (ANTs).
Subsequently, data were band-pass filtered (0.01 – 0.08 Hz) and
smoothed with a Gaussian kernel with a 6mm FWHM (SPM). To calculate
inter-hemispheric functional connectivity for seed-based analysis,
sub-cortical ROIs were obtained using segmentation by FSL's FIRST.
Cortical ROIs were created in FSLeyes from probability maps provided
in the Oxford-Harvard brain atlas. Inter-hemispheric functional
connectivity was estimated as the Fisher-Z transformed correlation
coefficient between ipsilesional and contralesional ROI time-series.Results
Structural
data from 45 participants and resting-state data from 40 participants
were included in the study. There were 31 patients with severe
fatigue (MFI: 72.3 ± 8.90; mean age: 63.7 ± 7.56) and 14 without
fatigue (MFI: 37.2 ± 9.21; mean age: 63.6 ± 13.9). Fatigued
patients had significantly smaller ipsilesional caudate nucleus (mean
difference + SE = -0.934 ± 0.320ml; p=0.018, corrected for total
intracranial volume, cTIV p=0.097), hippocampus (-0.348 ± 0.130ml;
p=0.009, cTIV p=0.249), amygdala (-0.250 ± 0.102ml; p=0.030, cTIV
p=0.027), and thalamus (-0.980 ± 0.349ml; p=0.010, cTIV p=0.083)
volumes. The putamen was significantly smaller in both the
ipsilesional and contralesional hemisphere (-1.698 ± 0.599ml;
p=0.003, cTIV p=0.023) as well as the globus pallidus (-0.311 ±
0.122ml; p=0.028, cTIV p=0.031). Cortical white matter volumes were
significantly reduced in patients with severe fatigue for the
ipsilesional frontal (-20.389 ± 7.291ml; p=0.010, cTIV p=0.028),
temporal (-14.050 ± 4.662ml; p=0.008, cTIV p=0.012), and parietal
(-13.899 ± 4.631ml; p=0.009, cTIV p=0.006) cortices.
Inter-hemispheric functional connectivity was significantly lower in
the severe-fatigue group in the orbitofrontal cortex (-0.242 ±
0.095; p = 0.012). No further significant differences in
inter-hemispheric functional connectivity were observed in any of the
other cortical and sub-cortical ROIs.Discussion
Stroke
survivors with high levels of self-reported fatigue have reduced
volumes of structures related to the fronto-striatal network, which
include the ipsilesional basal ganglia and frontal, temporal and
parietal cortices. Concurrent differences in inter-hemispheric
functional connectivity were also observed in the orbitofrontal
cortex. The volume differences between fatigued and non-fatigued
patients in this study were found mostly in the basal ganglia and
deep white mater remote to the initial infarct, suggesting that
fatigue may result from a global phenomenon rather than the localized
effects of infarction. The basal ganglia and fronto-striatal circuit
involvement have previously been implicated in fatigue for other
diseases such as multiple sclerosis4 and Parkinson's disease5,
suggesting that fatigue may have a similar pathophysiology across
other central nervous diseases.Conclusion
These
results suggest that post-stroke fatigue may be associated with
global volumetric changes after stroke around the fronto-striatal
network. Previous studies, which only included clinical variables and
basic demographic information, have failed to demonstrate such
associations with fatigue, supporting need for comprehensive
imaging-based assessments.Acknowledgements
References
1. Hinkle J, Becker K, Kim J, et al. Post-stroke
fatigue: emerging evidence and approaches to management: A Scientific
Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart
Association. Stroke. 2017;48(11):e000-e000
2. Schmitter D, Roche A, Maréchal B, et al. An evaluation of
volume-based morphometry for prediction of mild cognitive impairment
and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;7:7–17
3. Friston KJ, Williams S, Howard R, et al. Movement-related effects in
fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med.
1996;35(3):346-55.
4. Finke C, Schlichtling J, Papazoglou, et al. Altered basal
ganglia functional connectivity in multiple sclerosis patients with
fatigue. Mult Scler J. 2015;21(7):925-34
5. Pavese N, Metta V, Bose S, et al. Fatigue in Parkinson's
disease is linked to striatal and limbic serotonergic dysfunction.
Brain. 2010;133(11):3434-43