Chengcheng Zhu1, Xinrui Wang2, Qi Liu2, Christopher Hess1, David Saloner1, and Jianping Lu2
1Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Wall
enhancement (AWE) of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) on high-resolution black
blood MRI has been described in ruptured aneurysms. This study investigated 103
unruptured saccular IAs and aims to assess the association between AWE and
traditional risk factors and estimated one-year and five-year rupture risk estimated
from previous large trails. We found aneurysms with AWE had more than 3 times
higher estimated rupture risk (one-year and 5-year, 2.2% and 6.7%) than
aneurysms without AWE (0.6% and 2.0%), and AWE was associated with traditional risk
factors (size, location, symptoms). Identifying AWE may improve the risk
assessment of IAs.
Introduction
Wall enhancement of
intracranial aneurysms on high-resolution black blood magnetic resonance
imaging (HR-MRI) has been described in ruptured aneurysms 1. Size, location and other risk factors are also
associated with an increased risk of rupture 2. The prospective Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Study (UCAS) 2 trail provides a one-year rupture risk calculator based on the location
and size of the aneurysm from 6697 patients, and PHASE meta-analysis provides a five-year risk based on 8328 patients 3. This study sought to ascertain whether AWE in UIAs
is correlated with traditional
risk factors and conventional aneurysm properties. An additional objective of the study
was to determine the association between AWE and the estimated one-year and five-year aneurysm
rupture risk based on
existing large cohorts of UIAs.Methods
Study Population: 93 consecutive patients (33 male, mean age 57±10 years) with 103
confirmed unruptured saccular IAs were recruited from June 2014 to March 2017.
All patients underwent 3T MRI and 3D rotational DSA. Pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted
2D/3D black-blood fast-spin-echo MRI (SPACE)4 was performed. Scanning parameter: TR/TE
700-1000ms/10ms; resolution: 0.4mm*0.4mm in-plane and 2mm slice thickness (2D)
and 0.5mm isotropic (3D). Image analysis: The degree of
aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) was categorized into 3 grades: grade 0
indicates no AWE, grade 1 represents enhancement less than that of the
pituitary infundibulum, and grade 2 represents enhancement equal to or greater
than that of the pituitary infundibulum. The pattern of AWE was assessed as
none, focal (a small region of wall enhancement), heterogeneous (incomplete
wall enhancement) and complete enhancement. Aneurysm morphological parameters
were measured on DSA, including size, maximum aneurysm height,
aspect ratio (ratio of size to neck diameter, AR) and size ratio (ratio of
maximum aneurysm height to average parent vessel diameter, SR). One-year rupture
risk was calculated by the UCAS calculator, and
five-year rupture risk was calculated using PHASE calculator (www.kockro.com/en/calculators). Multivariate
logistic regression was used to study the factors independently associated with
AWE. Spearman’s rank correlation
analysis and chi-square test were performed to investigate the association
between AWE and rupture risk, morphological features and patients’
demographical characters. Results
Patients demographics
and aneurysm features with and without AWE are shown in Table 1. Aneurysms with AWE have more than 3 times higher estimated
rupture risk (one-year and 5-year, 2.2% and 6.7%) than aneurysms without AWE
(0.6% and 2.0%). Degree of AWE
showed strong positive correlation with size (𝜌=0.60, p<0.001), maximum aneurysm height (𝜌=0.63, p<0.001) and SR (𝜌=0.62, p<0.001), and weak
correlation with AR (𝜌=0.31, p=0.002). Larger area of AWE was
strongly correlated with size (𝜌=0.64, p<0.001), maximum aneurysm height (𝜌=0.65, p<0.001) and SR (𝜌=0.63, p<0.001), and
weakly correlated with AR (𝜌=0.35, p<0.001). Multivariate
logistic regression analysis (Table 2)
revealed that the presence of symptoms (OR 9.6, 95% CI 3.0-30.6, p<0.001),
non-ICA location (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-11.0, p=0.032) and size (OR 1.3, 95% CI
1.1-1.5, p=0.004) were independently associated with AWE. There’s no relationship
between AWE and age, hypertension and current smoking. Sample images of
patients with Grade 0-2 AWE are shown in Figure
1, 2 and 3.Discussion
To
our knowledge, this is the current largest cohort study of unruptured intracranial
aneurysm wall enhancement with more than 100 aneurysms, and this is also the first
study to report the relationship between AWE and estimated short- and medium-term
rupture risk. We found stronger and larger area of intracranial aneurysm wall
enhancement were associated with its rupture risk and the traditional risk
factors. This indicates that unruptured intracranial aneurysms with strong and
large area of AWE maybe need to be monitored more frequently. The major
limitation of current study is the lack of actual outcome (rupture or growth).
Due to the low rupture rate in the intracranial aneurysm, much larger scale
prospective studies with long follow-up duration are needed to clarify the role
of wall enhancement in predicting intracranial aneurysm rupture.Conclusion
Prospective assessment of unruptured intracranial
aneurysms wall enhancement with black blood MRI suggests that AWE associates
with traditional risk factors and estimated short- and medium-time rupture
risk. Identifying AWE may improve the risk assessment
of UIAs.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Edjlali
M, Gentric JC, Regent-Rodriguez C, Trystram D, Hassen WB, Lion S, et al. Does
aneurysmal wall enhancement on vessel wall mri help to distinguish stable from
unstable intracranial aneurysms? Stroke.
2014;45:3704-3706
2. Investigators
UJ, Morita A, Kirino T, Hashi K, Aoki N, Fukuhara S, et al. The natural course
of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a japanese cohort. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2474-2482
3. Greving
JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD, Jr., Morita A, Juvela S, Yonekura M, et al.
Development of the phases score for prediction of risk of rupture of
intracranial aneurysms: A pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:59-66
4. Zhu C, Haraldsson H, Tian B, Meisel K, Ko N, Lawton M, et
al. High resolution imaging of the intracranial vessel wall at 3 and 7 t using
3d fast spin echo mri. MAGMA.
2016;29:559-570