Chengcheng Zhu1, Xinrui Wang2, Bing Tian2, Qi Liu2, Christopher Hess1, David Saloner1, and Jianping Lu2
1Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
(UIAs) routinely undergo surveillance imaging to monitor the growth. CTA and
CE-MRA provide good accuracy in measuring size relative to gold standard 3D
DSA, but require contrast agent and/or have radiation, which is undesirable for
repeated imaging. We compared three MRI techniques on 58 aneurysms: 1) 3D
non-contrast black blood MRI (SPACE), 2) 3D TOF 3) CE-MRA, against gold
standard 3D DSA. SPACE was in excellent
agreement with DSA, better than CE-MRA and TOF. Our results support the use of
non-contrast SPACE for surveillance of UIA in the clinical setting.
Introduction
Intracranial aneurysms
(IA) is fairly common with approximately 3% of adults having an unruptured IA (UIA).
They have an associated morbidity and
mortality due to risk of rupture and the resultant subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clinical
management of UIA is based on aneurysm size and location. Because intervention-associated
risks may exceed the low rupture rates for smaller UIAs 1, the majority of those
patients are followed with surveillance imaging. 3D rotational DSA is the gold standard for IA morphology measurements,
but is invasive. CTA and CE-MRA are alternative modalities that show good accuracy
compared with DSA. However, they are undesirable
for repeated imaging because of radiation and/or the use of contrast agent. 3D
non-contrast TOF is another option, however it is subject to flow related
artifacts. 3D non-contrast black blood MRI (SPACE) has high isotropic
resolution (up to 0.5mm isotropic) with good visualization of the aneurysm geometry
and also provides evaluation of the aneurysm wall2. However, it has not been validated against DSA
for aneurysm size measurements or compared with clinical MRA techniques. This
study aims to compare black blood MRI with 3D TOF/CE-MRA for aneurysm size
measurements, using 3D DSA as a reference standard.Methods
Study
population: 54 patients
with 58 unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms were included in the
analysis. Patients demographic data and aneurysm locations are shown in Table 1. All patients were scanned in a
Siemens 3T scanner (Skyra) using the standard head coil. Sequences: 1) Clinical 3D
TOF acquired in axial slab (FLASH), with slice thickness 0.7mm, in plane
resolution of 0.5mm, scan time 4’56”. 2) Clinical CE-MRA (FLASH) acquired in coronal
plane using first pass with Gd-DTPA, isotropic resolution of 0.7mm, scan time
30 seconds. 3) 3D black blood SPACE (variable flip angle fast-spin-echo 2) acquired in sagittal plane, 0.5mm isotropic
resolution, echo train length 60, TR/TE = 900/5.6ms, scan time 8’16”. 4) 3D
rotational DSA was acquired following clinical protocol with a 5-second rotation
of 200° (144 frames), FOV 32cm and matrix 1024, resulting in 0.3mm in-plane
resolution. Image analysis: Two radiologists independently measured the
height, width and neck of the aneurysm on the three MRI sequences (MIP was used
for TOF and CE-MRA, MPR and MinIP were used for SPACE) and 3D DSA (using volume
rendering) (Figure 1). Bland Altman
plots were used to compare MRI sequences with DSA. Measurement error was
quantified using the coefficient of variance (CV, between measurements
SD/mean). Results
The comparison of three
MRI sequences with DSA for aneurysm size measurements is shown in Table 2. Bland Altman plots are shown
in Figure 2. 3D SPACE is in best
agreement with DSA, with the smallest limit of agreement (LOA) and measurement
error (CVs range 4.69% to 6.23%). 3D TOF had the largest LOA and measurement
error (CVs range 6.81% to 9.23%). The average CV was 5.24% for SPACE, 6.23% for
CE-MRA and 7.65% for TOF. No significant bias was found between the three MRI sequences
and DSA. As shown in the BA plots, measurement error didn’t correlate with aneurysm
size. Sample images of a patient with a large ICA aneurysm are shown in Figure 3. All three MRI sequences had excellent
inter-observer agreement (ICCs>0.95).Discussion
To
our knowledge, this is the first study validating 3D black blood MRI against
the gold standard DSA for aneurysm morphology measurements. We found 3D SPACE had
better accuracy than CE-MRA or 3D TOF. 3D TOF had the poorest agreement with
DSA, in agreement with previous studies 3. The accuracy of 3D TOF decreases
with increasing aneurysm size, when recirculating and slow flow are commonly
present. Good accuracy of CE-MRA has been previously reported compared to DSA 3. In our study, we found
SPACE was even slightly better than CE-MRA, possibly due to a higher resolution
of SPACE (0.5mm isotropic vs. 0.7mm isotropic of CE-MRA). Our results support
the use of non-contrast black blood MRI to replace CE-MRA for the monitoring of
intracranial aneurysms. Considering the recent concerns of Gadolinium brain and
bone deposition, non-contrast techniques have high potential as a tool for
aneurysm surveillance. SPACE also provides the aneurysm wall evaluation, which
is a unique advantage. Vessel wall features have been studied as potential
markers aneurysm rupture4. Conclusion
3D black blood MRI achieves
better accuracy for intracranial aneurysm size measurements than 3D TOF and
CE-MRA, using 3D DSA as a gold standard. This non-contrast technique is
promising for clinical surveillance of patients with unruptured intracranial
aneurysms.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, 3rd,
Meissner I, Brown RD, Jr., Piepgras DG, et al. Unruptured intracranial
aneurysms: Natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and
endovascular treatment. Lancet.
2003;362:103-110
2. Zhu C,
Haraldsson H, Tian B, Meisel K, Ko N, Lawton M, et al. High resolution imaging
of the intracranial vessel wall at 3 and 7 t using 3d fast spin echo mri. Magma. 2016;29:559-570
3. Cirillo
M, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo L, Cadioli M, Simionato F, Iadanza A, et al.
Comparison of 3d tof-mra and 3d ce-mra at 3t for imaging of intracranial
aneurysms. European journal of radiology.
2013;82:e853-859
4. Edjlali
M, Gentric JC, Regent-Rodriguez C, Trystram D, Hassen WB, Lion S, et al. Does
aneurysmal wall enhancement on vessel wall mri help to distinguish stable from
unstable intracranial aneurysms? Stroke.
2014;45:3704-3706