Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are vascular anomalies characterised by arteriovenous shunting with the lack of a capillary bed. Since the veins that drain an AVM contain arterialised blood, they would be expected to have a higher venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) than normal veins. Due to the paramagnetic properties of deoxyhaemoglobin, SvO2 can be calculated using magnetic susceptibility mapping (SM). Here, we calculated SM-based SvO2 in five patients with a brain AVM. We found higher SvO2 in the AVM draining veins compared to normal veins, showing that SM might be a valuable tool to study AVM physiology.
Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are vascular anomalies characterised by arteriovenous shunting through a network of coiled and tortuous vessels, with the lack of a capillary bed. AVMs are characterised by abnormal blood flow and by the presence of more oxygenated, higher pressure blood in the draining veins1,2.
Previous studies3-5 have shown that magnetic susceptibility mapping (SM) can be used to calculate values of venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) due to the paramagnetic properties of deoxyhaemoglobin:
$$SvO_2[\%]=100-\frac{{\Delta}\chi_{vein-water}-{\Delta}\chi_{oxy-water}Hct}{{\Delta}\chi_{do}Hct}\qquad[1]$$
where $$${\Delta}\chi_{vein-water}$$$ is the magnetic susceptibility ($$$\chi$$$) shift between venous blood and water measured using SM, Hct the haematocrit, $$${\Delta}\chi_{do}$$$ the $$$\chi$$$ shift per unit Hct between fully oxygenated and fully deoxygenated erythrocytes, and $$${\Delta}\chi_{oxy-water}$$$ the $$$\chi$$$ shift between oxygenated blood cells and water.
In a previous study6, we showed that SM could detect the presence of a brain AVM due to the malformation’s increased venous density. Here, we tested whether SM can detect increased SvO2 in a brain AVM’s draining veins based on images of five patients with a brain AVM, before treatment with gamma-knife radiosurgery.
Five patients were scanned with a Philips Achieva 3T system (Best, NL) using a 32-channel head coil. The protocol included a whole-brain 3D multi-echo gradient-echo (GRE) scan for SM (Table 1a); a post-contrast time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) scan for high-resolution imaging of the brain area containing the AVM (Table 1b); and a whole-brain post-contrast T1-weighted scan (Table 1c).
For each patient, a brain mask was created using ITK-Snap7 and the last-echo magnitude image of the GRE data set. SM was performed based on the GRE images, using a previously described processing pipeline6, which included multi-echo fitting of the complex MRI signal8, phase unwrapping using SHARP9, background field removal using PDF10 followed by a 3-voxel erosion of the brain volume10, and local field-to-susceptibility inversion using STAR-QSM11.
Since $$$\chi$$$ measurements are inherently relative, they must be referenced to a standard tissue region to enable the comparison of SvO2 across subjects. Here, $$$\chi$$$ was referenced to the posterior limb of the internal capsule12 (IC-posterior). IC-posterior was delineated based on the Eve susceptibility atlas13, which was coregistered to each patient’s skull-stripped fourth-echo magnitude image (TEEve/TE4 = 22.3/24 ms) using NiftyReg14,15.
For each patient, two ROIs were drawn using ITK-SNAP7: one (ROIDV) in a vein draining the AVM, the other (ROISSS) in a region of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) that did not drain blood from the AVM, and, therefore, could be regarded as healthy. ROIDV was drawn on the TOF image and had a different size for each patient due to the variable anatomy of the AVMs. As, depending on the location of the AVM, the TOF image did not always include the SSS, ROISSS was drawn on the T1-weighted image. ROISSS had a similar size across patients but was drawn on different locations of the SSS, to ensure the exclusion of regions draining blood from the AVM. Both ROIDV and ROISSS were then coregistered to the $$$\chi$$$ map using NiftyReg14,15.
For each patient, SvO2 was measured in each voxel of both ROIDV and ROISSS using Equation [1] and $$${\Delta}\chi_{do}=0.27\cdot4\pi$$$ ppm16, $$${\Delta}\chi_{oxy-water}=-0.03\cdot4\pi$$$ ppm4 and individual measures of Hct (40.3±3.08%) taken within three weeks before the MRI scan. For each patient, the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) of SvO2 were calculated in each ROI, along with the average difference of SvO2 between ROIs. Moreover, the means and SEMs of SvO2 were calculated across patients.
For each patient, Figure 1, Figure 2 and Table 2 respectively show the location of ROISSS and ROIDV, the distribution of SvO2, and the mean±SEM of SvO2. The average SvO2 was always larger in ROIDV than in ROISSS (Figures 2a-e and Table 2a-c).
In ROISSS of all patients and ROIDV of patients AVM01-03, the SEM of SvO2 had consistent values (Table 2a-b and Figure 2). However, in ROIDV of patients AVM04-05, the SEM of SvO2 was larger (Table 2b and Figure 2d-e). In AVM04, this might be due to the proximity of ROIDV to a region containing paramagnetic by-products of a previous haemorrhage; in AVM05 it is likely to be due to the proximity of ROIDV to the edge of the brain volume.