Amol S. Pednekar1, Carter Chu2, Tobias Schlingmann3, Zili David Chu1, Siddharth Jadhav1, Cory Noel3, and Prakash Masand1
1Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, United States, 2Clements High School, Sugar Land, TX, United States, 3Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
Synopsis
BSSFP
distinguishes the non-compacted trabeculation (NC) from compacted myocardium
(C), however the current diagnostic criterion (NC/C>2.3) for left
ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) suffers from subjective variability and tends
to over-diagnose, especially in pediatric patients where LV trabeculation
varies on a continuous spectrum. Numerical simulations estimate exponential relationship
between fractal dimension (FD) and perimetric ratio (PR) with 11 times higher
dynamic range for PR for the observed FD range in 30 LVNC positive and 20 negative
controls. Both FD and PR indices distinguish LVNC positive from negative (p<0.0001),
while the PR and FD*PR provided 6 and 11 times higher dynamic ranges
respectively.
PURPOSE
The
purpose of this study is to investigate two-dimensional geometric markers viz.
fractal dimension (FD) and perimetric ratio (PR) to quantitate irregularity and
sparsity of the LV trabecular structures. Numerical simulations are used to evaluate
the correlation and dynamic range of the PR compared to the previously reported
FD [1]. We clinically evaluated the automatic quantification of LVNC in bright cine
balanced steady-state free precession MR images using FD and PR in a pediatric cohort.BACKGROUND
Left
ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) has possible major clinical manifestations
such as congestive heart failure, arrhythmias and thromboembolism, including
sudden cardiac death [2, 3], thus it is critical to identify these patients
that require regular surveillance and likely activity restriction. Although MRI can reveal the
non-compacted trabeculation (NC) distinctly from compacted myocardium (C), the
current diagnostic criteria based on one dimensional measurements (NC/C>2.3)
suffer from subjective variability and tend to over-diagnose left ventricular
non-compaction (LVNC), especially in pediatric patients where LV trabeculation
varies on a continuous spectrum [4].METHODS
For
the purpose of numerical simulations, the morphologic left ventricular
endocardial boundary is represented in a binary image with a white circle of
one pixel line width on a black background. In order to eliminate the influence
of embedding space on FD calculation with the box counting method, square
images centered at the circle and sides equal to the radius of the circle were
created. The varying degrees of geometric irregularity of LV trabecular edge
images is simulated using equations shown in Fig 1. Set of 10 simulated images
were generated for each combination of amplitude (90% to 30% of original
radius) and frequency (4 to 22 cycles over the entire perimeter) levels of
variation in radius. The perimetric ratio (PR) is calculated as the ratio of the
perimeter length of the spatially variant radius to the perimeter of the
constant radius circle. Short-axis stack of end-diastolic bright blood MR
images from 30 LVNC positive patients (age 15±5.0, range 4-30 yrs, 22 m; NC/C
2.8±0.38, range 2.3-3.6) and 20 LVNC negative patients (age 16±7.4, range 8-39
yrs, 11 m) were analyzed retrospectively using a novel automated tool. The only
user interaction required was to select the most basal and apical slice to be
included in the analysis. The tool automatically tracks the LV size and shape.
Otsu’s thresholding algorithm delineates papillary and trabecular muscles. FD
were computed on the resultant edge images using the box counting method. A
piecewise closed Bézier curve of 2nd order geometric continuity
was fitted through the salient points of the convex hull of these edges to
obtain endocardial contours (Fig 2). The ratio of length of blood pool edges to
endocardial contour perimeter (PR) was computed for each slice. Paired t-tests
were performed between FD & PR and FD & FD*PR for all slices. Global
LVNC index was calculated as the mean of the top half (MTH) of the slices
sorted by particular index. Two sample t-tests were performed for FD, PR, and
FD*PR between LVNC positive and negative patients.RESULTS
Numerical
solutions generated 1000 binary trabecular edge images for a FD ranging from
1.26 to 1.69 with corresponding values of PR varying from 1.01 to 5.8.
Representative simulated images are shown in Fig 1. Representative clinical
images are shown in Fig2. The relationship between FD and PR for simulated
images can be expressed as simPR = 0.005e 4.21simFD. The
analysis was performed successfully in all subjects (149 apical, 165
mid-ventricular, and 136 basal slices) with a computation time of 5±2 sec per
subject. Fig 3 shows an overlay of FD and PR values of the 136 basal, 165
mid-ventricular, and 149 apical slices from 50 clinical cases on simulation
derived values. The relationship between FD and PR for simulated images can be
expressed as cliPR = 0.005e 3.41cliFD. The mean±SD, p values
and % change in median values with 95% confidence intervals are shown in Fig 4.
Figure 5 shows a one to one line plot and box plots for all indices along with
a scatter plot for all slices.CONCLUSION
In
this study we described a novel tool as well as a novel index to automatically
quantify LV trabecular irregularity and sparsity. Numerical simulations
estimate relationship between FD and PR to be exponential with estimated
dynamic range for PR 11 times higher than the calculated FD range in clinical
data. Both FD and PR indices distinguish LVNC patients from negative controls,
while the PR and FD*PR respectively provide 6 and 11 times higher dynamic
ranges.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
Captur G, Muthurangu V, Cook C, Flett AS, Wilson R, Barison A, et al.
Quantification of left ventricular trabeculae using fractal analysis. J
Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:36.
[2] Rigopoulos
A, Rizos IK, Aggeli C, Kloufetos P, Papacharalampous X, Stefanadis C, et al.
Isolated left ventricular noncompaction: an unclassified cardiomyopathy with
severe prognosis in adults. Cardiology. 2002;98:25–32.
[3]
Stöllberger C, Blazek G, Dobias C, Hanafin A, Wegner C, Finsterer J. Frequency
of stroke and embolism in left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction. Am
J Cardiol. 2011;108:1021–3.
[4] Petersen SE,
Selvanayagam JB, Wiesmann F, Robson MD, Francis JM, Anderson RH, et al. Left
ventricular non-compaction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance
imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:101–5.