Yuchen Zhang1, Yankai Meng2, Hongmei Zhang2, Chunwu Zhou2, Di Dong3, Mengjie Fang3, Yali Zang3, Zhenyu Liu3, Jie Tian4, Di Dong3, Di Dong3, and Di Dong3
1University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Beijing, China, 2Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China., Beijing, China, 3CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing P.R. China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing P.R. China., Beijing, China, 4CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Radiomics uses a large number of medical
imaging features and can demonstrate voxel-wise intratumor heterogeneity. We
calculated the radiomic signature for each patient using a weighted linear
combination of the radiomic features selected by machine learning methods. The study
endpoint was DFS, defined as the interval between TME surgery and disease
progression, which included tumor local recurrence, distant metastasis, or
death, or the date of the last follow-up visit (censored). The association
between the radiomic signature and DFS was explored. Then, the three models
were built to estimate the DFS in patients.
Synopsis
Radiomics uses a large number of medical imaging features
and can demonstrate voxel-wise intratumor heterogeneity. We calculated the
radiomic signature for each patient using a weighted linear combination of the radiomic
features selected by machine learning methods. The study endpoint was DFS,
defined as the interval between TME surgery and disease
progression, which included tumor local recurrence, distant
metastasis, or death, or the date of the last follow-up visit (censored). The
association between the radiomic signature and DFS was explored. Then, the three
models were built to estimate the DFS in patients.
Background and Purpose
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT)
followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is now the standard combined
treatment modality for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (1). Distant metastasis is the main cause of
treatment failure in patients with LARC. For patients at high risk of an
adverse outcome after nCRT, additional systemic therapy may reduce the risk of
distant relapse and confer a survival benefit. The aim of this
study was to develop a radiomic signature to predict disease-free survival
(DFS) in individual patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and assess its
incremental value to clinicoradiologic risk factors.Methods
Axial, sagittal, and oblique coronal T2-weighted
spin-echo sequences were acquired. Subsequently, a small field of view (16 cm ×
16 cm), high-resolution, oblique axial (perpendicular to the long axis of the
tumor) T2-weighted image sequence (repetition time/echo time, 5160 ms/151 ms;
flip angle, 90°; echo train length, 19; slice thickness, 3 mm; matrix, 512 × 512)
was performed. An axial spin-echo, diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging
sequence with background body signal suppression was then acquired at b values between
0 and 800 s/mm2. Thereafter, axial three-dimensional LAVA multi-enhanced MR images
were acquired. A bolus of gadolinium-based contrast agent (gadopentetate dimeglumine;
Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) 0.1 mmol/kg body weight was administered at 2 mL/s using
a power injector. One phase of images before injection of contrast agent and nine
phases of images after administration of contrast were acquired. The
acquisition time per phase was 15 s. The repetition time was 3 ms and the echo
time was 1.4 ms. A flip angle of 15° was used. The matrix was 320 × 192 and the
field of view was 40 mm × 40 mm. The slice thickness was 3 mm and the thickness
spacing was 0 mm. Patients underwent bowel preparation with antispasmodic
medication before the MRI examinations. All sequences were obtained during free
breathing. All manual tumor segmentations were performed by a gastrointestinal tract radiologist with 15 years of
experience. We performed image intensity normalization to transform arbitrary MRI
intensity values into a standardized intensity range, and the quantitative
radiomic features were calculated from these standard inputs (2). The radiomic features used in our study contained 485 three-dimensional
descriptor (3). A radiomic signature was
generated using a
least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model (4). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for both the training set (n = 54) and the validation set (n = 54) to explore the
association between the radiomic signature and DFS. Three
models were built in the training set, i.e., a radiomic model, a clinicoradiologic Cox
model and a combined model. Then the predictive ability of
each model was assessed by calculating the Harrell concordance index.Results
Using a 10-fold
cross-validation, the LASSO Cox model identified three intensity features and five
textural features that were most important for predicting the outcome (Figure 1). The
radiomic signature built with selected
features stratified patients into a low-risk group or high-risk group for DFS
in the training set (HR 6.83; P <
0.001) and was successfully validated for patients in the validation set (HR 2.92;
P < 0.001). The association between the radiomic signature and DFS
is shown by the Kaplan-Meier survival curves in Figure 2. The
predictive accuracy of the combined model was higher than that of the
clinicoradiologic model or the radiomic model (Figure 3.). Discussion and Conclusion
In this study, we identified a combined
model that was an effective biomarker for individualized evaluation before nCRT
in patients with LARC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the
prognostic value of a combined model and also the first to explore the
predictive value of a radiomic model in patients with LARC who receive nCRT. The
combined model had better prognostic performance in terms of predicting DFS than
either the radiomic model or the clinicoradiologic model alone and
the model may help to guide individualized treatment in these patients.Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from Special
Funds for Public Welfare Projects (201402019), Beijng Science and Technology Program
(Z161100000516101, Z161100002616022) , Beijing Hope Run
Special Fund of Cancer Foundation of china (LC2016A05), National Natural Science Foundation of China
(81227901, 61231004, 81771924, 81501616, 81671851, 81527805, and 81501549), the
special program for science and technology development from the Ministry of
science and technology, China (2017YFA0205200, 2017YFC1308701, 2017YFC1309100,
2016CZYD0001), the Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of the
Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-SW-STS-160), and the Youth Innovation
Promotion Association CAS.References
1. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger
W, et al.. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for
rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351: 1731-40.
2. Kickingereder P, Gotz M,
Muschelli J, et al.. Large-scale Radiomic Profiling of Recurrent
Glioblastoma Identifies an Imaging Predictor for Stratifying Anti-Angiogenic
Treatment Response. CLIN CANCER RES 2016;22: 5765-71.
3. Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER,
Leijenaar RT, et al.. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging
using a quantitative radiomics approach. NAT COMMUN 2014;5: 4006.
4. Tibshirani R. The lasso method
for variable selection in the Cox model. STAT MED 1997;16: 385-95.