4714

Value of R2* for predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy
Hongliang Sun1, Yanyan Xu1, Queenie Chan2, and Wu Wang1

1Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China, 2Philips Healthcare, Hongkong, China

Synopsis

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by surgery has been established as the standard for locally advanced rectal cancer. The treatment response after CRT is normally evaluated by MRI. However, MRI morphology techniques suffer from limitations in the interpretation of fibrotic scar tissue and inflammation. Several studies have demonstrated that sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy is related to the oxygenation status of the tumor. It has been shown that the slight increase in T2* signals from paramagnetic deoxyhemoglobin can be used for reflecting the tumor oxygenation status. Therefore, R2*(=1/T2*) might have the potential to be a predictor of prognosis and treatment response for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Synopsis

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by surgery has been established as the standard for locally advanced rectal cancer 1. The treatment response after CRT is normally evaluated by MRI. However, MRI morphology techniques suffer from limitations in the interpretation of fibrotic scar tissue and inflammation. Several studies 2, 3 have demonstrated that sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy is related to the oxygenation status of the tumor. It has been shown that the slight increase in T2* signals from paramagnetic deoxyhemoglobin can be used for reflecting the tumor oxygenation status 4. Therefore, R2*(=1/T2*) might have the potential to be a predictor of prognosis and treatment response for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Purpose

To evaluate the role of R2* in predict treatment response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), with tumor regression grade (TRG) [1] obtained by postoperative pathological results as the reference standard.

Methods

Totally, 102 patients (73 men, 29 women; mean age, 58.2±11.9 years; age range, 26-79 years) with rectal cancers underwent pelvis magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination before CRT. All pelvis examinations were performed in 3.0T MR unit including high spatial resolution T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and T2 fast field echo (T2-FFE) sequence using five echoes (TR/TE1/DTE[ms], 644/4.0/6.9; Flip angle, 45°; total scan duration, 5.2min). R2* was a measure of the signal loss and calculated as the slope of a line produced by plotting the logarithm MRI signal intensity versus echo time for the series of T2*-weighted images. Patients were categorized as responders to CRT (TRG1-2) or non-responders (TRG3-5).The R2* values between CRT responders and non-responders were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of R2* in predicting the response to CRT. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the optimal cut-off values were calculated, meanwhile accuracy rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) was determined. Inter-observer agreement of R2* values were evaluated using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Good agreement was obtained between two observers in terms of R2* analyses (ICC,0.8326, 95% confidence interval, 0.7618~0.8838). There were 26 CRT responders and 76 non-responders. R2* values were significantly higher in CRT responders (median, 31.14HZ, 1st-3rd quartiles 24.44~45.24HZ) than that in non-responders (median, 25.18HZ, 1st-3rd quartiles 21.72~30.20HZ). According to ROC curve, R2* values showed diagnostic significance with the AUC value of 0.702. The cutoff values for R2* were 26.92HZ (R2* values of CRT responders was greater than this value) with accuracy rate 65.69%, sensitivity 73.08%, specificity 63.16%, PPV 40.43%, NPV 87.27% .

Conclusion

R2* derived from T2-FFE sequence demonstrated moderate value in predicting tumor response to CRT, which seem to be more effective in rectal cancers with higher R2* value.

Acknowledgements

References

1. Letizia M, Davide I, Davide Paolo B, et al. Locally advanced rectal cancer: value of ADC mapping in prediction of tumor response to radiochemotherapy. European Journal of Radiology. 2013; 82:234-240.

2. Wright GA, Hu BS, Macovski A. Estimating oxygen saturation of blood in vivo with MR imaging at 1.5 T. J Mag Reson Imaging 1991;1:275–283.

3. Li X S, Fan H X, Fang H, et al. Value of R2* obtained from T2*-weighted imaging in predicting the prognosis of advanced cervical squamous carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Jmri, 2015, 42(3):681-688.

4. Fyles A, Milosevic M, Hedley D, et al. Tumor hypoxia has independent predictor impact only in patients with node-negative cervix cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:680–687.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 26 (2018)
4714