Koji Tokunaga1, Shigeki Arizono1, Hiroyoshi Isoda1, Hironori Shimizu1, Koji Fujimoto2, and Kaori Togashi1
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, 2Human Brain Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Synopsis
There has been no previous report on the optimal combinations of
b-values to obtain computed DWI (cDWI) with b-values above 1000 s/mm2
to evaluate pancreatic cancer. This retrospective study involved 30 pancreatic
cancer patients with tumor associated pancreatitis. We aimed to evaluate the optimal combination of b-values to obtain cDWI with
b-value of 1500 s/mm2 from the combinations of b-values between 0 and 500 s/mm2 (cDWI0-500), 0 and 1000 s/mm2 (cDWI0-1000), 500
and 1000 s/mm2 (cDWI500-1000),
and all b-values (cDWIALL). Only cDWI0-1000
demonstrated statistically higher tumor detectability compared to measured DWI,
while image quality was preserved in cDWI0-1000 and cDWIALL.
Introduction
The utility of computed diffusion weighted image (cDWI) for the
detection of pancreatic cancer has been reported [1]. However, the optimal
combination of b-values remains unclear as the material to obtain cDWI with
high b-values to detect pancreatic cancer [2]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal combination of b-values to
obtain cDWI in pancreatic cancer patients with tumor associated pancreatitis regarding
tumor detectability and total image quality.Method
This retrospective study involved 30 consecutive pancreatic cancer
patients with tumor associated pancreatitis (18 men, 12 women; range 49-88
years). The diagnosis of pancreatitis was confirmed with contrast-enhanced
computed tomography based on criteria used in the literature [3]. MR studies
were performed using 3.0 T MR units (Magnetom
Prisma, or Skyra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with spine matrix coil and body matrix
coil. Diffusion weighted
images were obtained with b-values of 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2 using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging
sequence in axial plane in respiratory gate. cDWI with b-value of 1500 s/mm2 was obtained
from combinations of b-values between 0 and 500 s/mm2
(cDWI0-500), 0 and 1000 s/mm2
(cDWI0-1000), 500 and 1000 s/mm2
(cDWI500-1000), and all b-values
(cDWIALL) using an in-house script written with MATLAB (R2013b, The
MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Qualitatively, tumor detectability and the total
image quality was evaluated in all cDWIs with the reference to measured DWI (mDWI)
with b-value of 1000 s/mm2 using a
4-point scale: 1, poor to 4, excellent. Quantitatively, contrast ratios (CRs)
of cancer and pancreatitis was calculated from the signal intensity (SI) of
tumor and pancreatitis (CR = | (SICancer – SIPancreatitis)
/ (SICancer + SIPancreatitis) |). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the
tumor and pancreatitis were measured. Steel-Dwass test were used to compare
parameters between the combinations. Results were considered statistically significant
at a p value of <0.005 regarding Bonferroni’s correction.Results
All cDWI groups showed higher tumor detectability
compared to mDWI (Fig.1), but only cDWI0-1000 showed statistical
significance (p<0.0001). All cDWI groups presented lower total image quality
than mDWI; among cDWIs, cDWI0-1000
and cDWIALL demonstrated higher quality compared to the other two
combinations within the cDWIs (p<0.0001) (Fig.2). All cDWI groups
improved in CR compared to mDWI, while SI of the tumor decreased in all groups
(Table.1). Among them, cDWI0-500 showed highest CR and ADC with
lowest SI, cDWI500-1000 showed lowest CR and ADC with highest SI. cDWI0-1000
and cDWIALL demonstrated same ADC (Table.2).Discussion
As
far as we know, this study is the first report
to investigate the optimal combination of the b-values to obtain cDWI. Our
result showed the combination of b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm2 was
optimal for the detection of pancreatic cancer within tumor associated
pancreatitis.
The
signal intensity on DWI exponentially attenuates with b-value based on a
measured ADC value. Therefore, cDWI is a technique to generate high b-valued DWI by
extrapolating decaying signal with DWI which was obtained by actual scan [4].
All
combinations of the cDWIs presented higher tumor detectability with higher CR
compared to mDWI. Within the cDWIs, cDWI500-1000 showed low tumor
detectability because of the small CR. However, cDWI0-500
demonstrated the worst tumor detectability despite the best CR. This could be
explained with the signal model, that higher ADC induces rapid increase of CR
and decrease of SI when b-value rises. Therefore, cDWI0-500 showed
the lowest total image quality due to lowest SI, which results in low tumor
detectability.
Tumor
detectability in cDWI0-1000 was slightly higher than cDWIALL,
despite the same ADC. This can be explained by the
downward deviation of the whole signal model, from the influence of mDWI with b-value
of 500 s/mm2. However, the influence of mDWI with b-value of 500
s/mm2 was not so large enough to lower total image quality.
Introduction of this concept into the clinical
settings may help to improve diagnosability and/or early diagnosis of
pancreatic cancer, by adding cDWI to routine abdominal MRI study.
There were some limitations
in our study. First, the sample size was
small. Second, since this was a retrospective study, mDWI with b-values of
50-200 s/mm2 are missing, which could be important when creating more
precise signal model considering several parameters such as intravoxel
incoherent motion.
Conclusion
cDWI with b-value of 1500 s/mm2 is useful for the detection
of pancreatic cancer within tumor associated pancreatitis. The combination of
b-values between 0 and 1000 s/mm2 is suitable throughout the
combinations of the b-value as the material for tumor detectability.Acknowledgements
The authors have no potential conflict of interest
related to this presentation.References
1. Fukukura Y, Kumagae Y, Hakamada H, et al. Computed
diffusion-weighted MR imageing for visualization of pancreatic adenocarcinoma:
Comparison with acquired diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 2017; 95(10):
39-45.
2. Ueno Y,
Takahashi S, Ohno Y, et al. Computed diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer
detection: the influence of the combinations of b-values. Br J Radiol 2015;
88(1048): 20140738.
3. Bollen
TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, Repas K, van Es HW, Banks PA, Mortele KJ. Comparative
evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing
severity of acute pancreatitis. Am J Roentgenol (AJR) 2011;197(8):386-392.
4. Blackledge MD, Leach MO, Collins DJ, Koh
DM. Computed diffusion-weighted imaging may improve tumor detection. Radiology 2011;261(2):573-581.