Synopsis
Compared with
participants with COMT rs4680-GG, the healthy Han Chinese participants with rs4680-A-allele
showed higher degree centrality and functional connectivity in medial prefrontal
cortex in resting-state BOLD. The rs4680-A-allele carriers also performed
better in 3-back performance than rs4680-GG carriers, and the accuracy of 3-back
has significant correlation with functional connectivity value, which indicated
that the COMT rs4680 mutation modulated the functional connectivity and working
memory performance.
Introduction
The
catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene, which encodes COMT protein, is
essentially involved in human emotion, reward processing, executive functions,
and especially working memory. Among those single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)
loci[1] of COMT, Val158Met polymorphism was believed to
play critical roles in human cognition[2, 3], which contains a G
to A missense variant[4]. To further investigate how COMT gene affects
the human brain in vivo, many studies have focused on task functional magnetic
resonance imaging (fMRI)[5-9]. However, few
studies have connected the rs-fMRI signals with working memory performance, and
to our knowledge, using the region of interest (ROI) extracted from degree
centrality (DC) map as the candidate hub of functional connectivity (FC)
analyzing in this topic, has not been studied so far. We aimed to investigate
the relationship between resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI)
signals in brain and working memory performance in COMT Val158Met
polymorphism carriers.Methods
This
study was approved by the local medical research ethics committee. Written
informed consent was obtained. Eighty participants were included and divided
into two groups based on genotype (28 participants with rs4680-A-allele, age
22.14±1.30 years, 14 Male/14 Female; 52 participants with rs4680-GG, age
22.82±1.77 years, 16 Male/36 Female). All participants underwent rs-fMRI and a battery
of neuropsychological test, including 1-back and 3-back, which focus on the
working memory performance. DC from rs-fMRI was compared between rs4680-A-allele
and rs4680-GG genotype carriers. Then the ROI extracted from the significantly
different region in DC map was used as the seed of the following FC analysis. The
scores of neuropsychological test was analyzed by two-sample T-test, and spearman
correlation analysis was proceeded between the scores and FC value in whole
subjects and within different genotype groups.Results
Compared with
rs4680-GG carriers, rs4680-A-allele carriers showed significantly increased DC in
bilateral superior medial frontal and bilateral anterior cingulum (Fig.1, p<0.01,
AlphaSim corrected). Using the ROI extracted from the significantly different
regioin in DC map as seeds, the FC value increased significantly in left superior
frontal, right superior medial frontal, right superior frontal and left
superior medial frontal in rs4680-A-allele group (Fig.2, p<0.01, AlphaSim
corrected). The A-allele group had better performance in some variables of California
verbal learning test (p<0.05) and 3-back accuracy (p=0.04). Spearman
correlation between FC value and neuropsychological tests in all subjects was
proceeded but did not reach significantly different level. However, significant
negative correlation was showed between FC value and 3-back accuracy in
rs4680-A-allele group, while rs4680-GG group did not reach statistical difference.
The same trend did show in the within-group correlation between 1-back accuracy
and FC value. The 1-back and 3-back accuracy had significant difference inside
genotype groups, and the difference between 3-back and 1-back accuracy showed
statistical difference in the correlation with FC value within A-allele group.
However, the tendency between all the above-mentioned within-group correlation
did not show obvious difference (Fig.3).Discussion
Previous
studies have indicated that humans with Met allele have increased cortical
dopamine signaling[7]
due to the different enzymatic activity compared with Val allele[2,
3, 10],
which probably indicates higher PFC activation and better performance during
working memory[9,
11, 12].
Some researchers have found that increased PFC signals and better working
memory associated with the A-allele participants[13-16],
while others found opposite conclusion[6,
8].
This suggests a more complicated mechanism might be necessary to explain the
effect of COMT on PFC. Many researches have implied that the inverted U model
could explain the dopaminergic regulation of prefrontal function[10,
17].
It assumed that both insufficient and excessive dopamine level would lead to
poorer performance. Inside the A-allele group with more dopamine in PFC, the
higher FC level they had, the lower accuracy they performed in 3-back, which
indicated the increased difficulty of task needs more brain activity. And the
GG-group had the opposite tendency, although it did not reach statistical
significant level, which both accorded with the inverted U model (Fig.4).Conclusion
Our results
suggest that the rs4680-A-allele genotype group shows significantly higher DC
and FC in prefrontal cortex, and better working memory performance compared
with rs4680-GG group. The 1-back and 3-back accuracy had significant difference
inside genotype groups, while significantly negative correlation was showed
between FC value and 3-back accuracy in rs4680-A-allele group, which is the
same trend between FC and the difference between 3-back and 1-back. These findings
advance our understanding of the relationship among COMT genotype, intrinsic
activity in prefrontal cortex and the performance in working memory, which may
be a baseline for future researches about how the dopamine affects spontaneous
fluctuation in rs-fMRI and the human cognition.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81720108022, 91649116, 81571040, B.Zhang, 81471643, B.Zhu.); key medical talents of the Jiangsu province, the "13th Five-Year" health promotion project of the Jiangsu province (B.Z.2016-2020); the social development project of science and technology project in Jiangsu Province (BE2016605, BE201707); Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Discipline (Laboratory) (ZDXKA2016020); the National and Provincial postdoctoral project (BE179 and 1501076A, BZ); the key project of Nanjing Health Bureau (ZKX14027, BZ); the Nanjing science and technology development program (NE179, B.Z.); and the project of the sixth peak of talented people (WSN-O50, BZ). National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0100100). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.References
1. Chen, X., et al., Variants in the catechol-o-methyltransferase
(COMT) gene are associated with schizophrenia in Irish high-density families.
Molecular psychiatry, 2004. 9(10):
p. 962.
2. Bertolino,
A., et al., Interaction of COMT
Val108/158 Met genotype and olanzapine treatment on prefrontal cortical
function in patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry,
2004. 161(10): p. 1798-1805.
3. Blasi,
G., et al., Effect of
catechol-O-methyltransferase val158met genotype on attentional control.
Journal of Neuroscience, 2005. 25(20):
p. 5038-5045.
4. Lachman,
H.M., et al., Human
catechol-O-methyltransferase pharmacogenetics: description of a functional
polymorphism and its potential application to neuropsychiatric disorders.
Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, 1996. 6(3):
p. 243-250.
5. Green,
A.E., et al., A gene–brain–cognition
pathway: prefrontal activity mediates the effect of COMT on cognitive control
and IQ. Cerebral cortex, 2012. 23(3):
p. 552-559.
6. Bertolino,
A., et al., Additive effects of genetic
variation in dopamine regulating genes on working memory cortical activity in
human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 2006. 26(15): p. 3918-3922.
7. Egan,
M.F., et al., Effect of COMT Val108/158
Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001. 98(12): p. 6917-6922.
8. Tan,
H.-Y., et al., Epistasis between
catechol-O-methyltransferase and type II metabotropic glutamate receptor 3
genes on working memory brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, 2007. 104(30): p.
12536-12541.
9. Caldú,
X., et al., Impact of the COMT Val
108/158 Met and DAT genotypes on prefrontal function in healthy subjects.
Neuroimage, 2007. 37(4): p.
1437-1444.
10. Mattay,
V.S., et al., Catechol
O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain
response to amphetamine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
2003. 100(10): p. 6186-6191.
11. Mier,
D., P. Kirsch, and A. Meyer-Lindenberg, Neural
substrates of pleiotropic action of genetic variation in COMT: a meta-analysis.
Molecular psychiatry, 2010. 15(9):
p. 918.
12. Bertolino,
A., et al., Prefrontal dysfunction in
schizophrenia controlling for COMT Val 158 Met genotype and working memory
performance. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 2006. 147(2): p. 221-226.
13. Congdon,
E., et al., Influence of SLC6A3 and COMT
variation on neural activation during response inhibition. Biological
psychology, 2009. 81(3): p. 144-152.
14. Winterer,
G., et al., COMT genotype predicts BOLD
signal and noise characteristics in prefrontal circuits. Neuroimage, 2006. 32(4): p. 1722-1732.
15. Bertolino,
A., et al., Prefrontal-hippocampal
coupling during memory processing is modulated by COMT val158met genotype.
Biological psychiatry, 2006. 60(11):
p. 1250-1258.
16. Winterer,
G. and D.R. Weinberger, Genes, dopamine
and cortical signal-to-noise ratio in schizophrenia. Trends in
neurosciences, 2004. 27(11): p.
683-690.
17. Williams,
G. and S. Castner, Under the curve:
critical issues for elucidating D1 receptor function in working memory.
Neuroscience, 2006. 139(1): p.
263-276.