Sean D McGarry1, Matthew Budde2, Sarah L Hurrell3, Kenneth A Ickzowski4, Michael Griffin3, Petar Duvnjak3, Kenneth Jacobsohn5, William Hall6, Mark Hohenwalter3, Andrew Nencka3, and Peter LaViolette3
1Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wawautosa, WI, United States, 2Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wawautosa, WI, United States, 3Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wawautosa, WI, United States, 4Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wawautosa, WI, United States, 5Urologic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wawautosa, WI, United States, 6Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wawautosa, WI, United States
Synopsis
The Medical College
of Wisconsin 39 (MCW39) template provides a common space for the analysis of
prostate cancer images. The template was generated through iterative spatial
registration of T2-weighted images starting with manually drawn contours
as a reference point. Expert annotations of Gleason Grade were transformed into
the template space, and maps of tumor probabilities reveal the spatial
localization of cancer across the cohort for each grade.
Purpose
Spatial registration to a common coordinate frame for
group-based analysis of MR images is nearly ubiquitous for some organs such as
the brain. However, no such template exists
for MRI analysis of prostate cancer. This study aims to spatially register
prostate images across a cohort of subjects, resulting in both a method for
cross-subject comparisons and generation of a common template for the analysis
of prostate cancer imaging. Methods
39 Patients
underwent MP-MRI prior to prostatectomy on a 3T field strength MRI scanner
(General Electric, Waukesha, WI) using an endorectal coil. T2-weighted
acquisition parameters were: 3370 ms TR, 120 mm FOV, with voxel dimensions
0.23x0.23x3 mm, 512 acquisition matrix, and 26 slices. Two weeks after imaging
patients underwent a radical prostatectomy. A custom 3D printed slicing jig was
created from each subject’s T2-weighted image in order to slice the
tissue in the same orientation as the MRI[1-4]. Whole mount tissue
samples were hematoxylin and eosin stained, digitized, and sent to a urologic pathologist for annotation. Digitized
slides were then aligned to the T2-weighted MRI using a non-linear
control point warping technique, and the expert annotation was likewise
transformed into MRI space.
The prostate template was generated using ANTs[5,6].
First, the prostate was manually
outlined on T2-weighted images, and the centroid of the masks were rigidly aligned. An iterative
process subsequently aligned the contours of the masks using translation,
rigid body, and non-linear (symmetric normalization: SyN), with each step
incorporating 6 iterations and the mean updated with each iteration. The resulting deformation field was applied
to the T2-weighted images. The template was further refined by
registering the T2-weighted images within the mask, thus aligning
the interior anatomy of the prostate.
The transform for each image to template space was then applied
to the pathologist annotations of Gleason grades 3-5 prostate cancer, as well
as pathologist annotated atrophy. Binary masks of individual lesions stratified
by Gleason grade were then combined to generate a probability map for each
grade. Since not all MRI slices had a corresponding histological images, a map
of the pathology sampling percentage was also created. Additionally, a map of
tumor asymmetry was generated by mirroring the warped images about the
left-right center and subtracting the overlap percentage. Results
Simple registration of T2-weighted image intensity was
unable to converge to a solution; the presence of high-contrast regions
outside of the prostate dominated, such as the endorectal coil void. Utilization
of the prostate contours derived from manual segmenting enabled a rapid
convergence in alignment of the prostate borders. Subsequent registration of
image intensities within the prostate refined the template, and the different
anatomical zones are clearly delineated in the mean T2-weighted image from all
39 subjects (MCW39).
The correspondence between MRI and pathology emerged after
alignment to the template. Tissue was
sampled densely in the central area of the organ, with progressively fewer
samples taken towards the periphery due to difficulty in rad-path alignment.
Atrophy occurred most frequently in the peripheral zone, concentrated highest
in the left peripheral zone in this selected sample. Tumors were most likely to
occur in the peripheral zone, most concentrated in the right peripheral zone.
High-grade cancer was most likely to occur along the boundaries of the organ in
both the peripheral and transition zone, and some asymmetry was noted where
tumors more prominently occurred in the right peripheral zone versus the left. Discussion
Our findings show tumors are most likely to occur in the peripheral
zone, as anticipated from previous studies. Interestingly, atrophy is most
likely to occur in the peripheral zone on the contralateral side from the
cancer. Prominent asymmetry was observed, but this is likely to be an artifact
of small sampling of histological sections in these regions.
The inclusion of additional images with different contrasts
(DWI, DCE) would further enhance the utility of the template for group studies. Likewise, greater numbers of subjects and
higher histological sampling density would permit more refined conclusions
regarding the propensity of tumors to be localized to different regions. These findings may have implications in the
detection and biopsy sampling of prostate cancer. Conclusion
The MCW39 template provides a standard space for the group
and populations based-analysis of prostate cancer. We provide both the template
image and a proof of concept study looking at the statistical overlap of pathologist
annotated prostate cancer. This study confirms that tumors are most likely to
occur in the peripheral zone, and atrophy is most likely to occur on the
contralateral side within the peripheral zone. Acknowledgements
Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin and the State of Wisconsin Tax Check off
Program for Prostate Cancer Research. National Center for Advancing
Translational Sciences, NIH UL1TR001436 and
TL1TR001437, and RO1CA218144.References
1.
Shah V, Pohida T,
Turkbey B, et al. A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance
imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds.
Rev Sci Instrum. 2009;80(10):104301
2.
Nguyen HS,
Milbach N, Hurrell SL, et al. Progressing Bevacizumab-Induced Diffusion
Restriction Is Associated with Coagulative Necrosis Surrounded by Viable Tumor
and Decreased Overall Survival in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016.
3.
Hurrell SL,
McGarry SD, Kaczmarowski AL, et al. Optimized b-value selection for the
discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern,
using diffusion weighted imaging. 2017.
4.
LaViolette PS,
Mickevicius NJ, Cochran EJ, et al. Precise ex vivo histological validation of
heightened cellularity and diffusion-restricted necrosis in regions of dark
apparent diffusion coefficient in 7 cases of high-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16(12):1599-1606.
5.
Avants,
B. B., et al. (2011). "A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric
performance in brain image registration." Neuroimage 54(3):
2033-2044.
6.
Avants,
B. B., et al. (2010). "The optimal template effect in hippocampus studies
of diseased populations." Neuroimage 49(3): 2457-2466.