Spiral-IDEAL is a fast and efficient technique for imaging dissolved-phase hyperpolarized 129Xe in tissue/blood plasma (T/P) and red blood cell (RBC) compartments of the lung. Previously, spiral-IDEAL has been limited to pre-clinical rodent models using multi-breath techniques not suitable for human subjects. In this work we optimize and demonstrate clinical translation of spiral-IDEAL for single breath-hold 129Xe imaging of human subjects. We compare and contrast several interleaved imaging strategies. Furthermore, we also demonstrate 3D spiral-IDEAL for simultaneous volumetric imaging of gas, T/P, and RBC compartments.
In this work we demonstrate application of 3D spiral-IDEAL imaging of 129Xe in human subjects within a single breath-hold. Coronal 2D projections acquired using a single-shot spiral trajectory (Fig. 2a) showed good spectral decomposition. However, the low spatial resolution of the single-shot acquisition lead to blurry images that are difficult to resolve. This is especially true of the dissolved images (specifically RBC) which exhibit further blurring due to short T2*. Interleaved spirals allowed for improved spatial resolution while keeping Tread short (Fig. 2b). Stack-of-spirals implementation allowed for volumetric imaging of all three 129Xe resonances. Because k-space is encoded on a Cartesian grid in the z-direction, minimal reconstruction complexity is added. However, this comes at the expense of slightly increased initial TE due to the phase-encoding gradient (180μs) prior to acquisition.
Although interleaved spirals improved spatial resolution versus single-shot, they are increasingly time and RF intensive. The increased consumption of gas-phase magnetization due to the larger number of pulses requires further consideration. Some excitation of gas is desirable for normalization of dissolved signals (i.e. ventilation differences, T1 depolarization, RF history). However, over-excitation of the gas resonance depletes the overall magnetization available for transfer to the dissolved-phases, resulting in lower dissolved-phase signals. This is likely the reason for low RBC signal intensity in the coronal projections (Fig. 2b) and 3D images (Fig. 3). However in subsequent scans, dissolved signal was high enough to facilitate calculation of signal ratio maps which have been shown to be useful semi-quantitative measures of lung function (Fig. 4)5–9.
In future, optimization of excitation (i.e. increased spectral selectivity) should help improve image quality by reducing excitation of gas and increasing flip angle at the dissolved resonances. Furthermore, improvements to xenon polarization and the use of multi-channel radiofrequency coils will also help. Future work will involve further testing of the pulse sequence in healthy volunteers for optimization and application to patient populations (e.g. radiation-induced lung injury and bronchopulmonary dysplasia). Additionally, the flexibility of this sequence allows volumetric resolution to be traded for repeated imaging at multiple exchange times to quantify gas exchange regionally.
1. K. Ruppert, J.R. Brookeman, K.D. Hagspiel, B. Driehuys, and J.P. Mugler, “NMR of hyperpolarized 129Xe in the canine chest: Spectral dynamics during a breath-hold,” NMR Biomed. 13(4), 220–228 (2000).
2. Y. V Chang, J.D. Quirk, I.C. Ruset, J.J. Atkinson, F.W. Hersman, and J.C. Woods, “Quantification of human lung structure and physiology using hyperpolarized 129Xe,” Magn. Reson. Med. 71(1), 339–344 (2014).
3 . J.P. Mugler III, T.A. Altes, I.C. Ruset, et al., “Simultaneous magnetic resonance imaging of ventilation distribution and gas uptake in the human lung using hyperpolarized xenon-129.,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107(50), 21707–12 (2010).
4. Z.I. Cleveland, G.P. Cofer, G. Metz, et al., “Hyperpolarized Xe MR imaging of alveolar gas uptake in humans.,” PLoS One 5(8), e12192 (2010).
5. K. Qing, K. Ruppert, Y. Jiang, et al., “Regional mapping of gas uptake by blood and tissue in the human lung using hyperpolarized xenon-129 MRI.,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 39(2), 346–59 (2014).
6. K. Qing, J.P. Mugler, T.A. Altes, et al., “Assessment of lung function in asthma and COPD using hyperpolarized 129Xe chemical shift saturation recovery spectroscopy and dissolved-phase MRI,” NMR Biomed. 27(12), 1490–1501 (2014).
7. S.S. Kaushik, S.H. Robertson, M.S. Freeman, et al., “Single-breath clinical imaging of hyperpolarized 129xe in the airspaces, barrier, and red blood cells using an interleaved 3D radial 1-point Dixon acquisition,” Magn. Reson. Med. 75(4), 1434–1443 (2016).
8. Z. Wang, S.H. Robertson, J. Wang, et al., “Quantitative analysis of hyperpolarized 129 Xe gas transfer MRI,” Med. Phys. 44(6), 2415–2428 (2017).
9. J.M. Wang, S.H. Robertson, Z. Wang, et al., “Using hyperpolarized 129 Xe MRI to quantify regional gas transfer in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis,” Thorax (2017) [Published online ahead of print] http://thorax.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210070.
10. F. Wiesinger, E. Weidl, M.I. Menzel, et al., “IDEAL spiral CSI for dynamic metabolic MR imaging of hyperpolarized [1-13C] pyruvate,” Magn. Reson. Med. 68(1), 8–16 (2012).
11. O. Doganay, T. Wade, E. Hegarty, C. McKenzie, R.F. Schulte, and G.E. Santyr, “Hyperpolarized 129 Xe imaging of the rat lung using spiral IDEAL,” Magn. Reson. Med. 76(2), 566–576 (2015).
12. O. Doganay, E. Stirrat, C. McKenzie, R.F. Schulte, and G.E. Santyr, “Quantification of regional early stage gas exchange changes using hyperpolarized 129 Xe MRI in a rat model of radiation-induced lung injury,” Med. Phys. 43(5), 2410–2420 (2016).
13. B. Zanette, E. Stirrat, S. Jelveh, A. Hope, and G.E. Santyr, “Regional Detection of Lung Injury using Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 Mapping of Blood Hematocrit in a Rat Model Involving Partial-Lung Irradiation,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25(1184), (2017).
14. P. Irarrazabal and D.G. Nishimura, “Fast Three Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Magn. Reson. Med. 33(5), 656–662 (1995).