Sohrab Afshari Mirak1, Kyung Hyun Sung2, Amirhossein Mohammadian Bajgiran1, Nazanin Hajarol Asvadi1, Ely R Felker1, Preeti Ahuja1, Anthony Sisk3, Robert Reiter4, and Steven Raman1
1Radiology, David Geffen school of Medicine at UCLA, LOS ANGELES, CA, United States, 2Radiological Sciences and Bioengineering, David Geffen school of Medicine at UCLA, LOS ANGELES, CA, United States, 3Pathology, David Geffen school of Medicine at UCLA, LOS ANGELES, CA, United States, 4Urology, David Geffen school of Medicine at UCLA, LOS ANGELES, CA, United States
Synopsis
We investigated the diagnostic performance of qualitative and
quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
(DCE-MRI) of prostate cancer (PCa) in 238 patients with 303 lesions located in
transition (TZ) and peripheral zone (PZ) stratified by pathology Gleason score
(GS) and PI-RADSv2 score with whole mount histopathology validation. There was
a significant difference in qualitative and quantitative values between low and
high-grade tumors and PI-RADSv2 scores in PZ PCa lesions. However, for tumors
located in TZ, only DCE curve type was significantly different between low and
high-grade PCa.
Introduction
This study investigates the role of qualitative and
quantitative parameters on DCE-MRI of prostate cancer (PCa) lesions in
transition zone (TZ) and Peripheral zone (PZ), stratified by pathology Gleason
score (GS) and Prostate
Imaging – Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) with
whole mount histopathology (WMHP) validation.Methods
In this HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved retrospective study, the
study cohort included 303 lesions in 238 men with PCa who underwent 3T
mutiparametric MRI (mpMRI) from 7/2009 to 12/2016 prior to robotic
prostatectomy and whole mount histopathology (WMHP). Clinical, mpMRI and pathologic
features were obtained. A genitourinary (GU) radiologist and a GU pathologist jointly
matched the Regions of Interest (ROIs) on DCE-MRI with corresponding PCa
previously identified on WMHP to determine true and false postives and
negatives. PI-RADSv2 defined qualitative DCE curve types for each enhancing ROI
included type 1 (progressive enhancement), type 2 (plateau) and type 3
(washout). Quantitative DCE-MRI was computed by a standard two-compartment
pharmacokinetic (PK) model 1, using a
separate workstation (DynaCAD; Invivo, Gainsville, FL), including (Ktrans (influx volume transfer coefficient), kep (efflux reflux rate constant) and iAUC (initial
area under the curve)). DCE-MRI features of true positive PCa lesions were
evaluated in TZ and PZ, based on GS grade (low GS =6, high GS> 6) and PI-RADSv2
scores. SPSS v24 was used to assess the significance of discrete &
continuous variables by nonparametric tests.Results
Overall 237 (88.2%) PCa lesions were located in
PZ and 66 (21.8%) lesions were located in TZ. In both TZ and PZ, high grade PCa
lesions had significantly higher proportion of Type 3 curves and lower proportion
of Type 2 curves as compared to low grade tumors (p< 0.05). Figures 1 shows
MRI lesions and corresponding WMHP sections in two patients with
curve type 2 and low grade PCa lesion (A) and curve type 3 and high grade PCa
lesion (B). In both TZ and PZ lesions, as PIRADSv2 scores increased from 2 to 5, the
proportion of lesions with type 3 curves increased and type 2 curves decreased,
although this was significant for PZ lesions only. In PZ, high grade tumors and
PI-RADSv2 score 4 & 5 PCa lesions had higher median of Ktrans, Kep and IAUC
compared to low grade tumors and PIRADSv2 score 2 & 3 PCa lesions,
respectively. In TZ, there were no differences in PK parameters of PCa lesions based on GS grades and PI-RADSv2
scores (tables 1 and 2). Discussion
DCE MR imaging assesses the permeability of the microcirculation
and passive transit of gadolinium chelates from the capillaries to the
interstitium. PI-RADSv2 scoring simplifies the interpretation of DCE relying on
qualitative enhancement only as an adjunct to DWI and T2WI for PZ and TZ PCa
lesions, respectively. Since, some previous studies have shown variable performance
of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters in differentiating normal from cancerous
prostate tissue 2,3,4. However, enhancement
alone may be insufficient since DCE-MRI has been demonstrated to be more robust
than T2WI for localization of PCa lesions 3 and for
improved tumor staging 5. In this study, we demonstrated
that the TZ and PZ, both high PI-RADSv2 score and high Gleason grade PCa
lesions were significantly associated with higher qualitative DCE-MRI curve
types (2 or 3). In the PZ, DCE quantitative PK parameters were significantly
greater for high grade PCa lesions and high PIRADSv2 scoring (4&5) lesions.conclusion
In both TZ and PZ, both high PI-RADSv2 score and high Gleason grade
PCa lesions were significantly associated with higher qualitative DCE-MRI curve
types (2 or 3). In the PZ, DCE quantitative PK parameters were significantly
greater for high grade PCa lesions and high PIRADSv2 scoring (4&5) lesions
suggesting that DCE curve types and kinetics may improve discrimination of more
aggressive PCa disease.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Tofts
PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson
Imaging. 1997;7(1):91-101.
2. Bonekamp
D, Jacobs MA, El-Khouli R, Stoianovici D, Macura KJ. Advancements in MR imaging
of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions. Radiographics.
2011;31(3):677-703.
3. Futterer
JJ, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, et al. Prostate cancer localization with dynamic
contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology.
2006;241(2):449-58.
4. Sanz-Requena
R, Marti-Bonmati L, Perez-Martinez R, Garcia-Marti G. Dynamic contrast-enhanced
case-control analysis in 3T MRI of prostate cancer can help to characterize
tumor aggressiveness. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(11):2119-26.
5. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR
prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(4):746-57.