Min Xu1, Xiangming Fang1, Mengjie Fang2, Di Dong2, Jie Tian2, and Zhongshuai Zhang3
1Imaging Center, Wuxi People’s Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China, 2CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing P.R. China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing P.R. China., Beijing, China, 3Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Quantitative Radiomic features based on
multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging have great clinical value in
discriminating prostate cancer and benign lesions with same imaging findings. We
extracted Radiomic features and compared the discrimination efficiency of the combined
three types of images with each single type of images, then incorporated
independent clinical risk factors and further developed an individual
prediction model. The experimental results show that the individual prediction
model achieved more accurate diagnosis results than only using Radiomic
signatures or clinical factors
Background and purpose
According to the EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines
on prostate cancer, MRI examination is a crucial part in preoperative
examination, along with PSA (prostatic specific antigen) level and other
clinical manifestations, guiding further clinical treatment[1]. The Prostate
Imaging – Reporting and Data System (version 2), T2WI, DWI and its derivative ADC
maps take the leading role in prostate lesion diagnosis[2]. The
malignant and benign prostate lesions could have the same image findings. Pathologic examination results used to be the ground truth in
tumor discrimination, which is invasive and may leads to overtreatment that can
have terrible side effects such as incontinence and impotence. As an
emerging technique, Radiomics provide a noninvasive, efficient and reliable
method in disease diagnosis and prediction[3]. In previous study,
Radiomics has been mostly applied in oncology, such as colorectal cancer, lung
cancer, breast cancer and so on. Experimental results showed that Radiomics connected
imaging features with clinical manifestations and molecular gene level, which can
obtain better recognition rates in tumor classification, tumor metastasis and
recurrence[4,5].
The purpose of this study is to investigate
the efficiency of multiparametric MRI (mp MRI) based Radiomic signatures in
discriminating prostate cancer, and to develop and validate a noninvasive clinical
individualized prediction model.Methods
Data was collected on a 3T MR scanners (MAGNETOM
Verio, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using 18-channel body coil. In
total, 331 patients were identified and involved in this study: mean age, 71
years; range, 46 to 94 years. All the patients underwent two MRI sequences
(T2WI, DWI) and were identified preoperative by pathological examination. For
patients whose interval time between screening and pathological examination
more than 2 months were excluded. The parameters of axial, coronal, and
sagittal T2WI were :TR/TE, 4000/100ms; flip angle, 150°; section thickness,
3mm; intersection gap, 3mm; pixel spacing, 0.75/0.75; FOV, 216mm×240mm2; matrix,
288×320, and the parameters of the used readout segmentation of long
variable echo-trains (RESOLVE) DWI were: the used b values, 0, 800 s/mm2; TR/TE,
3200/84 ms; flip angle, 90°; section thickness, 3mm; intersection gap, 3 mm; FOV,
250mm×250mm2; matrix, 192×192, readout segments, 7).
Peripheral zone (PZ), transition zone (TZ)
and lesion area were segmented on the three types of MR images (T2WI, DWI and the
corresponding ADC) and then extract Radiomic features respectively(Figure 1). The
segmentation was carried out by using a free, open-source, and multi-platform
image analysis software application for visualization and medical image
computing (ITK SNAP version 3.6.0; available at: http://www.itksnap.org/). Intra-class
correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the intra- and
inter-observer agreement of the features extraction. An ICC greater than 0.8
was considered presenting good agreement. The predictive performance was
calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and P <0.05
were considered statistically significant.
Results
The predictive performance of Radiomic
signatures based on multiparametric
MRI show better discrimination performance (AUC, 0.920) than each individual MR
images, as is shown in Figure 2(a) and 2(b). The discrimination efficiency were
further improved when considering both the multiparamertic Radiomic signatures and
independent clinical risk factors, which is shown in Figure 2(c) and 2(d) ROC
curves (AUC, 0.933).Conclusion
Multiparametric Radiomic signatures based
on three types of MR images (T2WI, DWI and ADC) performed better than only
using each signal MR image. The individual prediction model including
muiltiparametric Radiomic signatures and clinical factors manifested better preoperative
diagnosis performance, which could provide an easy-to-use clinical tool for
doctors.Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271629)References
- Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on
prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with
curative intent[J]. European urology, 2017, 71(4): 618-629.
- Weinreb J C, Barentsz J O, Choyke P L, et al. PI-RADS
prostate imaging–reporting and data system: 2015, version 2[J]. European
urology, 2016, 69(1): 16-40.
- Huang Y, Liang C, He L, et al. Development and validation of
a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in
colorectal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 34(18): 2157-2164.
- Aerts H J W L, Velazquez E R, Leijenaar R T H, et al.
Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics
approach[J]. Nature communications, 2014.
- Gillies R J, Kinahan P E, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than
pictures, they are data[J]. Radiology, 2015, 278(2): 563-577.