Thomas O'Reilly1, Wyger Brink1, and Andrew Webb1
1C.J. Gorter Center, Dept. Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
Synopsis
The
performance of surface coils for proton imaging at 3 Tesla can be improved by
placing low-loss high-permittivity blocks at the centre of the surface coil.
The signal-to-noise ratio in a human calf of a coil with integrated dielectric
block is 25% higher close to the coil and performs comparably well compared to
a standard surface coil at depths exceeding 6 cm providing a simple and
effective way of improving surface coil performance.
Introduction
Introduction
Dielectric
(or high-permittivity) materials have been used as a simple way to tailor B1+
fields in high-field MRI, either as a means to increase B1+
homogeneity1-3 or to produce intense local
focussing of the B1+ field4,
5. Due to the local effect of the
dielectric material on the B1+ field the dielectric
materials are typically placed directly on the subject and underneath a tight
fitting receive array. This study designs receive-only coil elements with the
dielectric materials fully integrated in order to determine whether the receive
sensitivity can be increased, as suggested by previous theoretical studies6. Electromagnetic simulations,
phantom experiments and in-vivo imaging were performed to evaluate the effects
on transmit and receive field efficiency of a coil with built-in dielectric
compared to an identically sized coil with no dielectric. Method
Two surface coils with inner dimensions of 73 × 60 mm2,
conductor width of 3 mm, with 4 tuning capacitors and a balanced matching
network were constructed. A rectangular dielectric block (70 × 57 × 10 mm3, εr = 660, σ = 0.01 S/m, fTE01δ = 267 MHz, mass = 210 gr) was placed
in the centre of one of the surface coils (see figure 1) and both coils were
subsequently tuned to the proton frequency at 3T. The S11 parameter
of both coils was better than -20 dB when loaded with a tissue-mimicking phantom
and placed under the human calf muscle.
The signal-to-noise in the phantom was evaluated using a low
flip angle single-slice gradient echo sequence (FoV = 220 x 400 mm2,
In plane resolution 2.5 × 2.5 mm2, slice thickness = 10 mm, TR/TE =
3.69/1.73 ms, flip angle = 1°, scan duration = 4.84 seconds). A single-slice B1+
map was acquired using the DREAM sequence7 (FoV = 220 × 400 mm2, in
plane resolution 2.5 × 2.5 mm2, slice thickness = 10 mm, TR/TESTE/TEFID
= 4.63/1.6/2.30 ms, readout pulse flip angle = 10°, STEAM angle = 50°, number of signal averages = 32,
scan duration = 93.4 s) to correct the SNR map for variations in signal
intensity arising from variations in the flip angle due to B1+
variations. All data were acquired with the coils placed on a 35 x 25 x 12 cm3
phantom (εr = 40, σ = 0.7 S/m) on a clinical 3T
MRI system (Philips Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). In-vivo
SNR data was acquired on healthy volunteers with the same scan sequences as
described earlier.Results
Figure 2
shows the S11 parameter plots of both the standard loop coil and the
coil with integrated dielectric. A small drop in Q of the dielectric-integrated
coil is observed compared to the standard surface coil, likely due to minor conductive
losses inside the dielectric material. B1+ intensity
in the phantom showed only minor changes when the dielectric block was added
with a 5% increase a few centimetres from to surface of the block and no changes further away. Addition of the dielectric block did not significantly alter
the shape of the dielectric integrated coil’s sensitivity profile compared to
the regular surface coil. The observed SNR in a phantom near the surface of the
coil, once normalised for variation in actual flip angle due to B1+
inhomogeneities, was 30% higher for the surface coil with integrated dielectric
compared to the standard surface coil. SNR of the dielectric integrated coil
exceeded the standard coil up to a depth of 3 cm after which both coils
performed equally well. Figure 5 shows the change in SNR when using the
surface coil with integrated dielectric compared to the reference surface coil
on a human calf muscle. An SNR improvement of 25% is observed up to 3 cm away
from the coil with performance of the dielectric integrated coil exceeding or
matching the performance of the regular surface coil over the entire
cross-section of the calf.Conclusion
Placement of
a non-resonant low-loss high-permittivity dielectric block at the centre of a
surface loop locally increases the SNR of the coil by up to 25% in-vivo while
the penetration depth of the coil is maintained providing a relatively simple
way to improve the performance of surface coils for proton imaging at 3T.Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the ERC, grant number 670629 and 737180 and by the NWO, grant number 13375.References
1. de Heer P, Brink WM, Kooij BJ, Webb
AG. Increasing signal homogeneity and image quality in abdominal imaging at 3 T
with very high permittivity materials. Magnet Reson Med 2012;68(4):1317-1324.
2. Teeuwisse WM,
Brink WM, Webb AG. Quantitative assessment of the effects of high-permittivity
pads in 7 Tesla MRI of the brain. Magnet Reson Med 2012;67(5):1285-1293.
3. Yang QX, Mao W,
Wang J, Smith MB, Lei H, Zhang X, Ugurbil K, Chen W. Manipulation of image
intensity distribution at 7.0 T: passive RF shimming and focusing with dielectric
materials. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24(1):197-202.
4. Brink WM, van der
Jagt AMA, Versluis MJ, Verbist BM, Webb AG. High Permittivity Dielectric Pads
Improve High Spatial Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Inner Ear at
7 T. Invest Radiol 2014;49(5):271-277.
5. Manoliu A,
Spinner G, Wyss M, Ettlin DA, Nanz D, Kuhn FP, Gallo LM, Andreisek G. Magnetic
Resonance Imaging of the Temporomandibular Joint at 7.0 T Using
High-Permittivity Dielectric Pads: A Feasibility Study. Invest Radiol 2015;50(12):843-849.
6. Vaidya MV, Deniz
CM, Collins CM, Sodickson DK, Lattanzi R. Manipulating transmit and receive
sensitivities of radiofrequency surface coils using shielded and unshielded
high-permittivity materials. MAGMA 2017.
7. Nehrke K, Bornert
P. DREAM--a novel approach for robust, ultrafast, multislice B(1) mapping.
Magnet Reson Med
2012;68(5):1517-1526.