Rasim Boyacioglu1, Dan Ma1, Debra McGivney1, Louisa Onyewadume1, Ozden Kilinc1, Chaitra Badve1,2, Vikas Gulani1,2, and Mark Griswold1,2
1Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2Radiology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting signal evolutions are
sensitized to certain tissue properties during data acquisition. The matching
step can be suboptimal due to dictionary limitations or tissue related
constraints (e.g. partial volume, magnetization exchange). Here, we propose to
apply Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to 4D MRF data after image
reconstruction without explicit dictionary matching for tissue
characterization, lifting the requirement for a relaxation model. ICA of whole
brain MRF data segments the brain into multiple components with single tissue
types such as gray matter, white matter and CSF for healthy subjects and also
tumor in the case of glioblastoma patients.
Introduction
Magnetic
Resonance Fingerprinting1 (MRF) is a quantitative tissue property
and system parameter mapping technique consisting of three essential steps:
data acquisition, dictionary construction and matching. First, in data
acquisition, the MR signal is manipulated with variable flip angles and
repetition times (TRs), and other dedicated modules (inversion pulses, T2 prep,
etc.) to make MRF signal evolutions sensitive to a range of T1/T2 values and
other desired tissue properties. Then, a dictionary with entries spanning all
possible properties and parameters is constructed. The signal evolution from
each voxel is then matched to a dictionary entry and thus to a certain tissue
property value. Any source of variation available in MRF signal evolutions not
addressed in the dictionary step is likely to affect the accuracy of matching
process, especially if it is not orthogonal to any of other simulated tissue
properties and system parameters. Also, when reduced to quantitative maps, the potentially
valuable source of variation in the MRF time course might not be fully
exploited. To explore the possibility of spatio-temporal analysis of 4D MRF
data in a model independent manner, Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is
applied to healthy subject and patients brain MRF data immediately after image
reconstruction and without any dictionary matching. Methods
In
the IRB approved study, a 3D MRF scan2,3 was performed in two
healthy subjects and two patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM). The
acquisition parameters were FOV: 300x300x144, matrix size: 256x256x48, image
resolution: 1.2x1.2x3 mm3, acquisition time: 4.6 minutes. kt-SVD low rank reconstruction4 was
applied to MRF data to generate aliasing-free time series (Figure 1). 4D MRF
data of two healthy subjects and two patients diagnosed with GBM
were fed into ICA5 separately with automated dimensionality
estimation. ICA is a blind source separation typically used for decomposing 4D
(space x time) functional MRI data into multiple spatial independent components
(IC) each with their associated time course. ICA applied to fMRI reveals groups
of voxels that have similar signal time courses hypothesized to originate from
simultaneous neuronal activity. In the proposed technique, underlying tissue
properties cause the MRF signal to have a similar time course for a given
tissue, and voxels which contain this tissue are expected to be grouped
together.Results
In
our preliminary results, the components obtained from ICA of GBM patients and healthy
subjects mostly correspond to anatomical structures. Figure 2 shows spatial
maps of 4 ICs associated with both the solid tumor region and the peri-tumoral
white matter region from the first GBM patient ICA. For comparison, Figure 3
has components containing normal tissue as well as the solid tumor for the
second GBM patient. In both figures, tumor associated ICs partially also
include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and grey matter tissue in their spatial maps.
White matter components, on the other hand, do not overlap with tumor regions
at all. Time courses of ICs found in all datasets is illustrated for one
healthy subject in Figure 4. Figure 5 illustrates gray matter associated
component from a healthy subject’s ICA for the whole brain.Discussion
Here
we have demonstrated that potentially useful maps of tissue structure can be
generated from MRF data without using an explicit dictionary matching step.
Several steps must be undertaken in order to observe the signal differences.
Since ICA looks for similar time courses across space, it can also be employed for
detection of noise sources with structured time signals. In fact, when ICA is run
on standard MRF time course reconstructions with the intent of separating noise
and tissue simultaneously, almost all ICs belong to the aliasing artifacts with
more than 95% of the variation in total. Only after low rank reconstruction is
one able to reach the small variations caused underlying tissue properties.
Experimentally it is found that ICA with automated estimation of dimensionality
provide an acceptable measure for the degrees of freedom with ~10 structurally
meaningful ICs.
The
time courses of ICs shown in Figure 4 also give insights for the optimization
of MRF data acquisition for ICA. Gray matter and CSF mostly differ in the
beginning of the acquisition and after the inversion pulse at time point 1200,
suggesting T1 as the dominant property separating these tissues. White matter
time course is different throughout the whole time series, suggesting both T1
and T2 sensitivity.
Conclusions
ICA applied to brain MRF data results in consistent
anatomical segmentation of brain tissue for healthy subjects and GBM patients.
The proposed exploratory analysis of MRF time course data is dictionary free
and does not rely on a relaxation model.Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge funding from Siemens Healthcare,
NIH grants 1R01EB016728, 1R01DK098503, 1R01BB017219.References
1. Ma
D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, et al. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature
2013;495: 187–192.
2.
Ma D, Pierre E, McGivney D, et al. Applications of Low Rank Modeling to Fast 3D
Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting. ISMRM Proceedings 2017; p129.
3.
Ma D, Jiang Y, Chen Y, et al. Fast 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting for a
whole-brain coverage. Magn Reson Med 2017; doi:10.1002/mrm.26886.
4.
Pierre E, Griswold M, Connelly A. Fast Analytical Solution for Extreme
Unaliasing of MR Fingerprinting Image Series. ISMRM Proceedings 2017; p1353.
5.
Melodic, FSL, https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/MELODIC