Teresa Nolte1,2, Daniel Truhn3, Nicolas Gross-Weege2, Mariya Doneva4, Peter Koken4, Aaldert Elevelt5, and Volkmar Schulz2,5
1Multiphysics & Optics, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2Physics of Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 3Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 4Tomographic Imaging Systems, Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany, 5Oncology Solutions, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, Netherlands
Synopsis
In the presence of aqueous and fatty tissues,
Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) acquisitions with spiral readout suffer from blurring
artifacts. We propose to correct undersampled spiral MRF data by combining MRF
with a Dixon acquisition and a subsequent conjugate phase reconstruction correction.
With the proposed method, the blurring artifacts are removed from the MRF data. T1 and T2 parameter maps with improved homogeneity
are obtained.
Introduction
Fast
Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) acquisitions rely on accelerated k-space acquisition schemes such as
undersampled spiral readouts. In the presence of both aqueous and fatty tissues,
however, even short spiral readout gradients cause heavy blurring artifacts in
the images. This hampers correct mapping of T1, T2 or the
fat signal fraction1. On fully sampled spiral images, a conjugate phase
reconstruction (CPR) has successfully been used after Dixon water-fat
separation to correct for blurring2. CPR was performed separately on the water
and the fat image. The off-resonance map needed for CPR is, conveniently, a
by-product of the 3-point Dixon processing. For undersampled spiral MRF, the
use of CPR has improved the matching results of MRF for aqueous tissues3,4.
In this work, we correct for water and fat blurring in undersampled spiral MRF by
combining MRF with a Dixon acquisition and CPR correction.Methods
We applied a spiral
Dixon multi-acquisition MRF sequence on the upper right leg of a healthy
volunteer and acquired 3 MRF trains S0, S1 and S2,
which consisted each of i = 1..500 acquisitions using RF pulses of variable
flip angles and a constant repetition time (Figure 1). Signal was acquired with
one rotating spiral interleave of 5 ms length, undersampling the k-space by a
factor of 25. The MRF trains differed in their echo times (TE0 =
4.61 ms, TE1 = 5.76 ms, TE2 = 6.91 ms) and had a duration
of 13.5 ms each.
For post-processing, a
mean off-resonance map was calculated from the temporal averages, denoted by $$$<>$$$, over the
undersampled signals S0 and S2: $$$<f_0> = arg\left(\frac{<S_2>}{<S_0>}\right)$$$. Proceeding similarly to2, $$$<f_0>$$$ was smoothed and subsequently used to separate
the data into its water and fat contribution Swblurred
and Sfblurred, which consisted of 500 complex images
each. These were deblurred by CPR, using $$$<f_0>$$$ for Swblurred and $$$<f_0>-440$$$ Hz for Sfblurred. Finally,
the deblurred water and fat MRF data SwCPR and SfCPR
were recombined to one MRF dataset. A dictionary of possible signal evolutions
was calculated using extended phase graphs5.The best matching parameters (T1,
T2) were selected for each voxel by inner product matching between
the deblurred MRF data and the dictionary. Furthermore, water and fat signal
images were approximated by temporally averaging over the CPR-corrected as well
as over the uncorrected MRF data. A Cartesian 3-point Dixon sequence was
acquired as a comparison data set to judge the accuracy of our post processing
method.Results
$$$<f_0>$$$ shows similar large-scale features to the
Cartesian Dixon off-resonance map, but some finer ring-like subfeatures which mostly
disappear after smoothing (Figure 2). After Dixon separation, the fat image
<Sfblurred> shows heavy blurring artifacts (Figure 4b).
The T1 and T2 maps reflect these artifacts when matching the
uncorrected MRF data to the dictionary (Figure 3a+b).
After CPR, the boundary
between muscle tissue and subcutaneous fat is well distinguishable and the
relaxation parameter maps (Figure 3c+d) show improved homogeneity. Average values
T1muscle=(840±90) ms, T2muscle
=(41±15) ms, T1fat =(300±60) ms and T2fat
=(120±40) ms are similar to literature6. In the parameter maps, finer substructures
in the muscle are not visible and a spiral flow artifact remains around the
vessel. Yet, the deblurred water and fat maps (Figure 4c+d) show the same features
as the Cartesian 3-point Dixon scan (Figure 4e+f). When calculating the fat signal
fraction $$$S_f / (S_w+S_f)$$$, the CPR-deblurred MRF result slightly
overestimates the fat signal fraction in the area of muscle tissue in
comparison to the Cartesian Dixon sequence (Figure 5).Discussion
Parameter
maps were improved after a Dixon water-fat separation and subsequent CPR. Finer
substructures in the T1 and T2
maps are probably non-visible due to their low SNR, e.g. in gaps
or areas of low fat fraction. Some remaining signal after imperfect deblurring
may also play a role. This may be improved by employing a CPR with
multi-frequency interpolation. Obtaining water and fat images by temporally
averaging over the signal evolutions remains an approximation: As aqueous
tissue has a larger T1 than fatty tissue, a larger portion of its
fingerprint signal is in fact negative. Thereby, the fat fraction is slightly overestimated.Conclusion
This
work shows that it is possible to correct for water-fat blurring in spiral MRF
data without the use of fat-suppression methods. This makes spiral MRF more
suited for clinical applications like breast imaging, which else suffer from
blurring artifacts. According to the original idea of MRF, the undersampled acquisition
results in a sequence duration of only 1:36 min (13.5s/MRF train). Future work
includes the application to other anatomical areas.Acknowledgements
This
research
project is supported by the European Commission through the Marie
Sklodowska-Curie
Actions,
Innovative
Training Program - European Industrial
Doctorate,
Project Nr.
642445.References
1 Ostenson J, et al. Fat Signal Fraction Determination Using MR
Fingerprinting, Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)
2 Boernert P, et al. Spiral Water–Fat Imaging with Integrated Off-Resonance
Correction on a Clinical Scanner, Magnetic Resonance Imaging 32:1262–1267
(2010)
3 Koken P, et al. Improving Accuracy in MR Fingerprinting by
Off-Resonance Deblurring, Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)
4 Ostenson J, et al. Multi-frequency
interpolation in spiral magnetic resonance fingerprinting for correction of
off-resonance blurring, Magnetic Resonance Imaging 41, 63–72 (2017)
5 Scheffler K, A Pictorial Description of Steady-States in
Rapid Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance, Vol. 11(5)
291–304 (1999).
6 Gold G E, et al. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T:
Relaxation Times and Image Contrast. American Journal of Roentgenology,
Vol.183(2) 343-351 (2004)