Shintaro Ichikawa1, Utaroh Motosugi1, Yoshie Omiya1, and Hiroshi Onishi1
1Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo-shi, Japan
Synopsis
Hyperintensity in the dentate nucleus (DN) and
globus pallidus (GP) on unenhanced T1-weighted images (T1WI) was associated
with previous administration of linear gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)
in pediatric patients. The DN-to-pons ratio increased as the number of linear
GBCAs administrations increased. The GP-to-thalamus ratio of the “Linear GBCAs
≥ 5 administrations” group was significantly higher than that of the “No GBCAs
administration” and the “Linear GBCAs 1–4 administrations” groups. The number
of previous administrations of linear GBCAs was positively correlated with the
DN-to-pons ratio and the GP-to-thalamus ratio.
Purpose
Recent studies have reported an association
between hyperintensity of the dentate nucleus (DN) and globus pallidus (GP) on T1-weighted
images (T1WI) and a history of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)
administration. Increased signal intensity of the DN on T1WI has been reported
to be positively correlated with previous exposure to linear GBCAs, but not to
macrocyclic GBCAs (1–3). Several reports have focused on pediatric patients (4–8).
However, there is no report of the phenomenon in a Japanese population. Therefore,
this study aimed to evaluate whether an association exists between a T1-signal
increase of the DN or GP on T1WI and previous administration of linear GBCAs in
pediatric patients.Methods
This retrospective study was approved by the
institutional review board; the requirement for informed patient consent was
waived. The inclusion criteria for participant enrollment were: (i) at least
five consecutive administrations of linear GBCAs (gadodiamide or gadopentetate
dimeglumine) followed by brain MRI, (ii) no history of administration of other
or unknown GBCAs, and (iii) brain MRI using a 1.5-T scanner. A total of 42
patients were assigned to the “Linear GBCAs ≥ 5 administrations” group. Additionally,
42 patients with a history of 1–4 consecutive administrations of linear GBCAs
and 42 with no history of GBCA administration (“Linear GBCAs 1–4
administrations” group and “No GBCAs administration” group) were included. Age
and sex distributions were matched among the 3 groups. The final study included
126 patients (male:female, 72:54; median age, 16 (range 4–18) years) (Table 1).Results
The DN-to-pons
ratio increased as the number of linear GBCAs administrations increased (P <
0.0001–0.0063, Fig. 1). The GP-to-thalamus ratio of the “Linear GBCAs ≥ 5
administrations” group was significantly higher than that of the “No GBCAs
administration” and the “Linear GBCAs 1–4 administrations” groups (P <
0.0001, Fig. 1). The GP-to-thalamus ratio of the “Linear GBCAs 1–4 administrations”
group did not differ significantly from that of the “No GBCAs administration”
group (P = 1.0000, Fig. 1). The number of previous administrations of linear
GBCAs was positively correlated with the DN-to-pons ratio and the
GP-to-thalamus ratio (Fig. 2). The interobserver ICC for measurement of the
DN-to-pons ratio was excellent (0.8236). That of the GP-to-thalamus ratio was
good (0.6738). Figs. 3 and 4 present representative clinical cases.
[Discussion]
The results of this study indicate that
hyperintensity of the DN and GP on T1WI is associated with previous
administration of linear GBCAs in pediatric patients. These findings are
consistent with previous reports (6–8). Flood et al. reported that a signal
increase of the GP was not observed (6). Our study included patients with a
history of gadodiamide administration, which is the least thermodynamically
stable of the GBCAs. This may affect the discrepancy.Conclusion
High signal intensity of the DN and GP on T1WI
is associated with previous administration of linear GBCAs in pediatric
patients.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1) Kanda T, et al. Radiology. 2014;270:834-841.
2) Radbruch A, et al. Invest Radiol
2015;50:805-810.
3) Cao Y, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol
2016;206:414-419.
4) Ramalho J, et al. J Magn Reson Imaging.
Radiology 2015;276:836-844.
5) McDonald JS, et al. JAMA pediatr
2017;171:705-707.
6) Flood TF, et al. Radiology
2017;282:222-228.
7) Roberts DR, et al. AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol 2016;37:2340-2347.
8) Hu
HH, et al. Pediatr Radiol 2016;46:1590-1598.