More than 170 volunteers (patient subjects and normal controls) have been scanned since April 2016 following installation of a compact 3T MRI system with high-performance gradients (gradient strength=80mT/m, slew-rate=700T/m/s) at our institution. Despite peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) related concerns associated with the high-performance gradients, no or minimal PNS sensation has been reported, with the exception of three normal control subjects. To mitigate the effect of PNS in these and other especially sensitive subjects, a simple pulse sequence modification was developed. Two of the subjects who reported PNS from their initial exam were available to be re-imaged with the modified pulse sequence, and subsequently reported no PNS.
The original 3D-FLAIR sequence (designed for a 200 T/m/s system) includes strong and fast switching crusher gradients combined with slice-encoding lobes on the logical Z- (slice selection) axis (Fig. 1). A simple sequence modification was made to allow a user-specified degree of derating of slew-rate (SR) for the crusher lobe ramps, while leaving the total area under crusher gradient lobe unchanged. The echo spacing a function of the degree of slew rate derating was recorded.
Two of the three subjects who previously experienced PNS were available to return for a repeat exam with the modified sequence on the C3T. They were re-imaged under an IRB-approved protocol. The PNS threshold level on both subjects was measured as function of the degree of slew rate derating. The repeated imaging used a 32-channel head coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA) and concomitant field compensation2,3 for the asymmetric gradient design on the C3T. The imaging parameters were: TR/TE/TI=7600/94/2063 ms, in-plane and through-plane ASSET factor=2, readout bandwidth=±62.5 kHz, slice thickness=1.2 mm, echo train length=200, FOV=240×240 mm2, matrix size=256×256. The scan time was 6 minutes 46 seconds. The standard acquisition plane for the 3D-FLAIR is sagittal, but all three planes were acquired to test for PNS dependence. Finally, the reconstructed images from the modified sequence were compared by a board-certified neuroradiologist with those acquired in the previous (700 T/m/s crusher ramp) exam.
PNS was reported only in the sagittal acquisition, which corresponds to the crusher gradient waveforms being played on the physical X-axis (i.e., right-left). This is consistent with previous results where the physical-X gradient coil had lower PNS threshold compared to Y- and Z-coils1. As a function of SR for the crusher gradient, the measured PNS threshold levels from the two subjects were 466.7 and 350 T/m/s on the physical X-axis demonstrating some subject-dependence for the PNS threshold. As the SR decreased, the corresponding echo spacing increased accordingly, e.g. by a small amount on the order of few hundred microseconds (Table 1). Notably, the scan time remained unchanged even with the echo spacing penalty. In addition, no noticeable difference in image quality was observed with and without the proposed modification (Fig. 2). In a blinded comparison, equivalent image contrast and lesion conspicuity was reported.
We believe that the PNS was observed on the C3T before the pulse sequence modification because it was using “stock” software, originally designed for a whole-body system. The original pulse sequence designers had no reason to restrict the slew rate performance of the crusher ramp when using a standard 200 T/m/s system, so the ramp time was minimized. This caused PNS in 3/170 subjects with a sagittal 3D-FLAIR acquisition. Derating the gradient ramps for the problematic crusher gradient pulse resolved the problem, with negligible performance penalty.
1. Lee S-K, Mathieu J-B, Graziani D, et al. Peripheral nerve stimulation characteristics of an asymmetric head-only gradient coil compatible with a high-channel-count receiver array. Magn Reson Med 2016;76:1939–1950. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26044.
2. Tao S, Weavers PT, Trzasko JD, Shu Y, Huston J 3rd, Lee SK, Frigo LM, Bernstein MA. Gradient pre-emphasis to counteract first-order concomitant fields on asymmetric MRI gradient systems. Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jun;77(6):2250-2262. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26315.
3. Weavers PT, Tao S, Trzasko JD, Frigo LM, Shu Y, Frick MA, Lee SK, Foo TKF, Bernstein MA. B0 concomitant field compensation for MRI systems employing asymmetric transverse gradient coils. Magn Reson in Med 2017. doi:10.1002/mrm.26790