Chengyan Chu1,2, Monica Pearl3, Yanrong Chen1,2, Anna Jablonska1,2, Xiaolei Song1,2, Miroslaw Janowski1,2, and Piotr Walczak1,2
1Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Institute for Cell Engineering, Cellular Imaging Section, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents
effective chemotherapy of brain tumors. Intra-arterial (IA) injection of
hyperosmotic mannitol has been attempted for many years to permeabilize the BBB,
however due to high variability, this procedure never became a routine clinical
practice. We have previously shown that real-time MRI may circumvent that
obstacle in large animal model. However, for drug screening purposes the mouse
model if preferred. Here, we have shown that real-time, interventional MRI is
also instrumental to precisely open BBB in rodents, and more importantly combining
it with subsequent delivery of chemotherapeutic drug melphalan provides
therapeutic benefit warranting consideration of clinical application.
Purpose
To develop safe and reproducible technique to
disrupt local BBB in mice through guidance of interventional MRI and to improve
efficacy of IA chemotherapy of brain tumors including glioblastoma.Methods
Naïve or human glioblastoma inoculated scid mice
(20-25g, Jackson Laboratory) were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane gas. Briefly,
the occipital artery was cauterized, the ECA and pterygopalatine arteries (PPA)
were ligated temporarily with 4-0 silk sutures. The common carotid artery (CCA)
was catheterized with a microcatheter. The mice with intra-arterial
(IA) catheter secured were positioned in a Bruker 11.7T MRI scanner. Baseline
T2 (TR/TE 2500/30) and T1 (TR/TE 100/1.88) weighted and dynamic GE-EPI
(TE=3.0ms, TR=60ms, FOV=18, matrix=128, and acquisition time=92s and 16
repetitions) images of the brain were acquired. IA Feridex (dissolved in saline
at 1:100; 0.1mg Fe/ml) was infused under dynamic GE-EPI to predict perfusion
territory at specific speeds. 25% mannitol was delivered via IA route over one minute
at the speed determined by previous Feridex injection. MRI (T1, T2-weighted)
and histology were used to assess status of the blood brain barrier (BBB) and
any consequences compromising safety of the procedure. For
the glioblastoma-bearing mice, the BBB opening was followed by subsequent IA melphalan
infusion (0.05mg/mouse) as a one-stop-shop.Results
We have previously reported a strong association between
IA infusion speed and perfusion territory in large animals1. Here, we observed similar
dependence for mice and real-time MRI was essential for adjusting the injection
speed for safe and predictable brain targeting. Initially our transcatheter SPIO
contrast delivery, at the infusion rate between 0.0008-0.0016ml/s
resulted in inconsistent cerebral perfusion. However, when the speed was
increased to the level between 0.0015 and 0.0025 ml/s, desired
brain perfusion was obtained as visualized by characteristic reduction in
signal intensity for the duration of injection bolus (Fig.1a-b). Gadolinium-enhanced T1 weighted scan showed
hyperintensity in the region previously highlighted by the contrast infusion at
the same rate (Fig.1c).
This indicates successful BBB opening by IA mannitol as predicted by perfusion
pre-scan. In histopathological validation using Evans Blue, which is a gold standard
for BBB assessment and rhodamine, which was used a surrogate marker of
therapeutic agent demonstrated pattern of extravasation that was consistent
with the observed by MRI (Fig.1d).
There was strong correlation of the SPIO perfusion pre-scan and T1+Gd
enhancement (Fig.1e). In assessment of safety of the
BBBO procedure T2-weighted MRI 3 days post BBBO showed no obvious abnormalities
and the T1+Gd enhancement was not observed any more(Fig.2a).
Immunohistochemistry for GFAP and IBA-1 7 days post BBBO showed no
activation of astrocytes or microglia (Fig.2b-c).
Similarly, there was no evidence of neuronal damage based on NeuN staining (Fig.2d). Altogether these data indicate
excellent safety profile of BBB opening procedure. Subsequent experiments were performed in mice implanted with luciferase-expressing glioblastoma (Fig.3a). Tumor bearing mice were subjected to BBB disruption under
interventional MRI (Fig.3b) followed
by 0.05mg IA melphalan treatment. Longitudinal bioluminescent imaging revealed marked reduction of signal
intensity six
days after IA chemotherapy compared to no chemotherapy controls indicating
treatment response. However, after this initial reduction the signal in treated
mice continued to grow.Discussion
The goal of BBBO is to maximize CNS targeting of the
therapeutic agent with minimizing systemic toxicity. However, osmotic BBBO proved
highly variable and inconsistent2. This is also reflected by
inconsistent methodology of preclinical studies. The infusion velocity of mannitol into carotid
artery varied particularly, and in many animal studies extremely exceeded
physiological rate of brain perfusion and had to be damaging3-4. Our MRI-guided IA injection
experiments in several species show the value and importance of imaging
allowing adjustment of infusion rate and open BBBO at physiologically relevant
non-damaging infusion rates5-6. Our work showed that IA
melphalan following BBBO can reach and affect the tumor growth. Transient
nature of this effect is likely due to chemoresistance. In the future studies,
we will potentiate the anti-tumor effect by adjusting parameters, for example,
higher drug concentration, longer duration of mannitol infusion and will administer
different chemotherapeutic agents with the same targeted approach.Conclusions
MRI
guidance enables precise fine-tuning of the infusion rate to achieve safe and
effective local BBBO at a high reproducibility. Bypassing the BBB obstacle
resulted in treatment response, but the effect was transient.Acknowledgements
Supported
by NIH/NINDS R01NS091110References
1. Janowski, M.; Walczak, P.; Pearl, M.
S., Predicting and optimizing the territory of blood–brain barrier opening by
superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion under dynamic susceptibility
contrast MRI guidance. Journal of
Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2016,
36 (3), 569-575.
2. Joshi, S.; Ergin, A.; Wang, M.; Reif,
R.; Zhang, J.; Bruce, J. N.; Bigio, I. J., Inconsistent blood brain barrier
disruption by intraarterial mannitol in rabbits: implications for chemotherapy.
J Neurooncol 2011, 104 (1), 11-9.
3. Foley, C. P.; Rubin, D. G.; Santillan,
A.; Sondhi, D.; Dyke, J. P.; Crystal, R. G.; Gobin, Y. P.; Ballon, D. J.,
Intra-arterial delivery of AAV vectors to the mouse brain after mannitol
mediated blood brain barrier disruption. J
Control Release 2014, 196, 71-78.
4. Yang, W. L.; Barth, R. F.; Leveille,
R.; Adams, D. M.; Ciesielski, M.; Fenstermaker, R. A.; Capala, J., Evaluation
of systemically administered radiolabeled epidermal growth factor as a brain
tumor targeting agent. Journal of
Neuro-Oncology 2001, 55 (1), 19-28.
5. Walczak, P.; Wojtkiewicz, J.;
Nowakowski, A.; Habich, A.; Holak, P.; Xu, J.; Adamiak, Z.; Chehade, M.; Pearl,
M. S.; Gailloud, P.; Lukomska, B.; Maksymowicz, W.; Bulte, J. W.; Janowski, M.,
Real-time MRI for precise and predictable intra-arterial stem cell delivery to
the central nervous system. J Cereb Blood
Flow Metab 2016.
6. Janowski, M.; Lyczek, A.; Engels, C.;
Xu, J.; Lukomska, B.; Bulte, J. W.; Walczak, P., Cell size and velocity of
injection are major determinants of the safety of intracarotid stem cell
transplantation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
2013, 33 (6), 921-7.