This work deals with the problem of dynamic MRI reconstruction and motion estimation jointly. Specifically, a multi-scale affine optical flow model is incorporated into the compressed sensing framework. Simulation results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithm in image reconstruction and motion estimation against the standard CS based method for MRI reconstruction.
Given the DMRI in a matrix form, where each column represents a temporal frame of the DMRI, the problem of DMRI reconstruction and motion estimation jointly is formulated as a constraint optimization problem as follows: $$\{\mathbf{f},\mathbf{u}\} = \text{argmin}_{\mathbf{f},\mathbf{u}} \frac{1}{2} || \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{f}) - \mathbf{b} || ^2 +\frac{\lambda}{2}||\mathbf{T}_{\mathbf{f}_0}(\mathbf{u})-\mathbf{f}||^2, \text{s.t.}, ||\mathbf{f}||_1\leq\epsilon,$$ where $$$\mathbf{b}$$$ is the observed k-t data, $$$\mathbf{A}$$$ is the data acquisition operator, $$$\lambda$$$ is the regularization parameter to weight the importance of the OF term. $$$\mathbf{T}_{\mathbf{f}_0}(\mathbf{u})-\mathbf{f} = \mathbf{f}_0 + \nabla_x \mathbf{f}_0 \mathbf{u}_1 + \nabla_y \mathbf{f}_0 \mathbf{u}_2 -\mathbf{f} $$$ is the OF equation, where $$$\mathbf{f}_0$$$ is the reference image, $$$\mathbf{u} = [\mathbf{u}_1,\mathbf{u}_2]^T$$$ is the motion vectors. Note that a reference image is prerequisite in this problem formulation. Fortunately, the idea of the introduction of a reference image in MRI reconstruction has been explored, see e.g., [1]. The constraint promotes the sparsity of the reconstructed images. Since typical heart motions are given by rotation, expansion, contraction,and shear, an affine OF model was implemented. The motion vectors can thus be expressed by $$\begin{cases}\mathbf{u}_1 = \mathbf{u}_{10} + \mathbf{u}_{11}x + \mathbf{u}_{12}y\\\mathbf{u}_2 = \mathbf{u}_{20} + \mathbf{u}_{21}x + \mathbf{u}_{22}y\end{cases}.$$
In order to solve the constraint optimization problem, we firstly reformulate it into a non-constraint version by calculating its augmented Lagrange (AL) function as below $$\text{argmin}_{\mathbf{f},\mathbf{u},\mathbf{g},\mathbf{d}} \frac{1}{2} || \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{f}) - \mathbf{b} || ^2 +\frac{\lambda}{2}||\mathbf{T}_{\mathbf{f}_0}(\mathbf{u})-\mathbf{f}||^2 + \alpha||\mathbf{g}||_1 + \frac{\mu}{2}||\mathbf{f} - \mathbf{g} + \mathbf{d}||^2,$$ where $$$\mathbf{d}$$$ is the AL multiplier and $$$\mu$$$ is the corresponding regularization parameter. An alternating framework is proposed to deal with the formulated problem, which is summarized as below. Specifically, step 1 is addresed using conjugate gradient descent. Step 2 solves the proximal operator of $$$\ell_1$$$-norm term. Step 3 updates the Lagrange multiplier. Step 4 estimates the motion vectors. Note that the motion estimation in step 4 is ill-posed. In this work, a multi-scale technique for affine OF model [2] is implemented to approximate the solution for motion vectors.
$$\begin{array}{l}\text{Proposed Algorithm} \\\text{For}\; k = 0,\ldots\\\left\lfloor\begin{array}{l}1: \mathbf{f}^{k+1} \in \arg\min_\mathbf{f} \frac{1}{2} \|\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{f}) - \mathbf{b}\|^2 \\\;\;\;\; \;\;\;\;\;\;+ \frac{\mu}{2} \|\mathbf{f}-\mathbf{g}^{k}+\mathbf{d}^{k}\|^2 + \frac{\lambda}{2}\|T_{\mathbf{f}_0}(\mathbf{u}^k) - \mathbf{f}\|^2 \\2: \mathbf{g}^{k+1} \in \arg\min_{\mathbf{g}} \alpha \|\mathbf{g}\|_1 +\frac{\mu}{2}\|\mathbf{f}^{k+1}-\mathbf{g}+\mathbf{d}^{k}\|^2 \\3: \mathbf{d}^{k+1} = \mathbf{d}^{k} + \mathbf{f}^{k+1} - \mathbf{g}^{k+1} \\4: \mathbf{u}^{k+1} \in \arg\min_{\mathbf{u}} \frac{\lambda}{2} \|\mathbf{T}_{\mathbf{f}_0}(\mathbf{u}) - \mathbf{f}^{k+1}\|^2\end{array}\right.\end{array}$$
[1] Ningning Zhao, Daniel O'Connor, Adrian Basarab, Dan Ruan, Ke Sheng, Coupling Reconstruction and Motion Estimation for Dynamic MRI through Optical Flow Constraint, in Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging , Houston, Texas USA, Feb. 2018.
[2] Michael Sühling, Muthuvel Arigovindan and Christian Jansen and Patrick Hunziker and Michael Unser, Myocardial motion analysis from B-mode echocardiograms, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 2005;14(4):525-536.
[3] Michael Lustig and David L. Donoho and Juan M. Santos and John M. Pauly, Compressed sensing MRI, IEEE Signal Process. Mag.
2008;25(2):72-82.