Joshua de Bever1,2, Mihir Pendse1,2, and Brian K Rutt1,2
1Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 2Radiological Sciences Laboratory, Stanford, CA, United States
Synopsis
This abstract details the implementation of an automated
pipeline for designing high channel count RF coils for the purpose of non-invasive
Focused RF hyperthermia generated from Ultra-high field MRI parallel transmit
coils. The pipeline integrates multiple tools including Sim4Life for EM-FDTD
simulations in the Virtual Population physiologically realistic body models, Advanced
Design Systems circuit simulator, and Matlab for custom algorithm execution.
This work leverages GPU acceleration which has reduced simulation times for an
84 channel RF coil from 77 days on a CPU to 6 hours on three compute nodes
equipped with 14 affordable GPUs.
INTRODUCTION
The concern about increased specific absorption rate (SAR)
of power deposition at ultra high field (UHF) has given rise to novel
algorithms1 that leverage the
increased degrees of freedom of parallel transmit RF array coils to minimize
SAR deposition. This abstract presents work aimed at achieving the opposite:
delivering focal maximum SAR
to an arbitrarily specified target volume for the purpose of intentionally causing tissue heating for
therapeutic purposes. The goal is to accomplish non-invasive thermal therapy using
commonly available UHF MRI technology; applications could include focal opening
of the blood-brain barrier via hyperthermia2,3 and activation
of temperature-sensitive therapeutic nanoconstructs. We refer to this concept
as MR-guided Focused RF (MRgFRF). The optimal design of the Focused RF (FRF) transmit
array remains to be determined, but simulating even a single FRF array design is
a tedious process. To quantify the effects of design parameters such as operating
frequency, number of required array elements, etc, large numbers of design
simulations will be required. No single existing tool can perform all the
evaluations required. We have developed a software toolchain which automates
the interaction of several simulation tools and exploits GPU acceleration to
efficiently perform electromagnetic and thermal simulations in realistic
computational human body models4. This toolchain is
founded on the Sim4Life (SPEAG,
Zurich) multi-physics modeling package, interfaced with the Advanced Design Systems (Keysight, Santa
Rosa, USA) circuit simulator, and the Virtual
Population4
physiologically realistic body models (IT’IS, Zurich).METHODS
We have previously presented maxSAR5: an efficient algorithm that maximally
focuses RF energy into a target volume. In this abstract, we have implemented a
comprehensive and highly automated FRF array design pipeline (Figure 1) around
this algorithm to study array coil designs with 8-128 channels. Figure 2 shows the
framework’s flexibility in specifying coil element geometry. Electromagnetic (EM)
simulations are then run for tuning the coil to a desired frequency. Since lumped
element circuit components are unspecified at this stage, one simulation is run
for each port where it is the active voltage input port and all other ports are
50 Ω loads. The resulting
S-matrix relates how each port responds when another port is excited. Figure 3
illustrates an 84 channel elliptical design. The toolchain automates 420 simulations,
producing results quickly and consistently. The EM simulations were performed on
NVIDIA 1080Ti GPUs using the Virtual Population “Ella” human model. A batch
processor takes the S-matrices and runs a circuit optimization routine developed
in ADS to solve for the capacitor values that tune the coil to the desired
frequency. The toolchain automates the process of importing these values into
the Sim4Life coil description. Final EM field maps for each channel are then generated
in Sim4Life. These field maps are exported to Matlab where the maxSAR algorithm
uses them to maximizes SAR (and consequently tissue heating) in a target region.
The resulting total volumetric SAR which can be used with the Sim4Life thermal
solver to compute the heating achievable by each design.RESULTS
The
tune/match pipeline step (see Figure 1) took approximately 30 minutes per coil
element using 2x1080 Ti GPU accelerators. Using the 14 GPUs available in our
compute nodes, 7 coil element simulations were processed in parallel. In total,
6 hours of computation time were required for all 84 channels. Representative
electric field maps are shown in Figure 4 for four coil elements of the 84 channel
elliptical FRF coil design.DISCUSSION
The
design pipeline described will make it possible to more quickly and efficiently
optimize the FRF system design. We envision two possible hardware
configurations for FRF hyperthermia: (1) a dedicated applicator as shown in
figure 3, and (2) an “all-in-one” approach where the imaging RF coil is also
used for FRF heating. The all-in-one approach would be elegant, potentially making
any MRI system into a therapeutic modality. UHF MRI scanners commonly have 8
parallel transmit RF amplifiers, although systems with 16 and even 32 transmit
channels are available, which should provide sufficient degrees of freedom to
accomplish FRF. However, the dedicated applicator approach affords more design
flexibility (e.g. separate optimization of RF coils for imaging and heating),
and would allow simultaneous operation of the FRF heating and imaging RF coils
at independent frequencies. The pipeline we introduce here will enable us to quantify
these tradeoffs in future work.CONCLUSION
We have developed an efficient coil design pipeline that has
greatly accelerated the design of high-channel-count focused RF heating coils.
Focused RF heating has the potential to transform UHF MRI into a combined
therapeutic and diagnostic modality capable of non-invasive hyperthermia.Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge research support by GE
Healthcare and by NIH T32 CA009695, NIH P41 EB015891 and NIH 1 U01 EB025144-01.References
REFERENCES:
1. Pendse
M, Rutt BK. Overcoming limitations of virtual observation points in ptx using
impulse. In: Proceedings of the ISMRM. Vol 25, 2017.
2. Shivers RR, Wijsman JA. Chapter 19
blood-brain barrier permeability during hyperthermia. In: Progress in Brain
Research. Vol 115. Elsevier; 1998:413-424.
3. Moriyama E, Salcman M, Broadwell RD.
Blood-brain barrier alteration after microwave-induced hyperthermia is purely a
thermal effect: i. temperature and power measurements. Surg Neurol.
1991;35(3):177-182.
4. Gosselin M-C, Neufeld E, Moser H, et al.
Development of a new generation of high-resolution anatomical models for
medical device evaluation: the virtual population 3.0. Phys Med Biol.
2014;59(18):5287-5303.
5. Pendse M, Rutt BK. An algorithm for
maximum-sar targeted RF hyperthermia. In: Proceedings of the ISMRM. Vol
23. ; 2015:3224.