Chathura Kumaragamage1, Dan Madularu2, Axel P Mathieu3, Derek Lupinsky3, Robin A de Graaf4, and Jamie Near2
1Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Douglas Hospital Brain Imaging Center, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
Synopsis
Dynamic Carbon-13 (13C) magnetic
resonance spectroscopy (MRS) remains to be the only noninvasive method capable
of measuring neuroenergetics and neurotransmitter cycling in the brain1. Proton observed carbon edited (POCE) MRS2 is an attractive alternative
to direct 13C methods due to improved signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR). This
study reports a PRESS localized POCE sequence utilizing simultaneous editing
and localization (SEAL-PRESS), which allows the TE to be reduced to a
theoretically optimal value of ~1/JHC (8.1ms, in this implementation). The sequence was
validated in phantom and in a rat preparation, and demonstrated >17%
improvement in 13C labeled metabolites relative to a 12.6-ms PRESS-POCE
sequence.
Purpose
Indirect 13C magnetic resonance
spectroscopy (MRS) by proton observed carbon editing (POCE) allows for the non-invasive investigation of neuroenergetics and neurotransmitter cycling in the brain in vivo1,2. The
sensitivity of POCE-MRS can be enhanced through the use of short echo-time (TE)
sequences, which minimizes T2 and homonuclear J-evolution related losses. Previous
POCE-MRS implementations either use longer than optimal echo times due to
sequence limitations, or short TE sequences based on image selected in vivo
spectroscopy (ISIS) requiring multi-shot acquisitions for 3D localization. To that end, this work presents a novel
single-shot PRESS-localized POCE-MRS sequence that involves the application of
Simultaneous Editing And Localization pulses (SEAL-PRESS, see Fig 1), allowing the TE to be
reduced to a theoretically optimal value of ~ 1/JHC
(8.1-ms, in this implementation). The simultaneous application of editing and
slice-selective refocusing pulses adds an additional consideration into the
sequence design; namely, the normally broadband frequency selective
carbon-editing pulses now become slice-selective.Methods
Editing
efficiency of the SEAL-PRESS sequence was evaluated in simulation
and subsequently implemented on a Bruker Biospec 70/30 horizontal bore
preclinical scanner (120 mm diameter actively shielded gradient insert, 650 mT/m
in 150 μs). Experiments
were performed on two, adult male, Long Evans rats weighing 260-280 g. The tail
vein of one rat was cannulated for a 0.85 M [1,6-13C2]-Glucose
(Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc.) infusion, after which
the animal was placed in the MRI scanner, under anesthesia (1-1.5% isoflurane).
The 1H-[13C] coil setup consisted of a volumetric 1H
transmitter, a 1H Rx-only surface coil, and a quadrature 13C
transmit surface coil as previously described3. After a 2.5-hr
dynamic in vivo 13C MRS scan session, the rat head was
microwave-fixed (10-kW Muromachi Microwave Fixation System) and placed back in
the MRI for further scanning. Animal preparation procedures were previously
approved by McGill University’s animal research ethics committee and are in
accordance with guidelines set by the council on animal care.
The SEAL-PRESS
sequence was implemented with the following parameters (TR = 4000 ms, TE = 8.1
ms). Both proton refocusing
pulses RxI(π) were Mao (length =
1.3 ms, bandwidth = 4.8 kHz), and both carbon editing pulses
RxS(π)
were HS
pulses [length = 1.3 ms, bandwidth (99% inversion efficiency) = 8.2 kHz, B2,
max ~ 5 kHz]. The
RxS(π)
pulse
bandwidth (BWS) required to cover the 13C chemical shift range (5-65 ppm,
centered at 35 ppm, the resonance of [4-13C]-Glu) and within-voxel
frequency shift, was calculated as illustrated in Fig 2a, since
RxS(π)
is
applied during a slice-selective gradient. Thus the minimum required BWS of the
HS pulse in this implementation was 5.7 kHz. Editing performance of the SEAL-PRESS sequence
was compared against a previously described3 PRESS-POCE sequence (TR = 4000
ms, TE = 12.6 ms). An initial 58-mg bolus of [1,6-13C2]-Glc was
infused during the first 15-seconds, and the rate was tapered off exponentially
every 30-seconds to rapidly raise and maintain plasma glucose levels at ~10 mM
as described previously4. Spectral fitting of POCE data was
performed in LCModel using basis sets simulated in the FID-A toolkit.Results
Fig 2b-c illustrates 1-D spatial profiles along both refocusing pulse directions
(L-R, and A-P) obtained with the SEAL-PRESS and 12.6-ms PRESS-POCE sequences; sharper
profiles were obtained for the SEAL-PRESS sequence due to the use of Mao
pulses (without compromising sequence TE). Furthermore, near-uniform nutation in the region of interest is seen
due to the homogenous B1+ field generated with the 1H
volumetric transmitter4. Maximum editing efficiency of the
SEAL-PRESS sequence was 95.5%, in comparison to ~ 96.3% obtained with the PRESS-POCE sequence with a classical editing scheme. Fig 3a illustrates time-resolved 1H-[13C]
spectra obtained primarily encompassing the anterior cerebral cortex following
the [1,6-13C2]-Glc infusion (100-μl voxel, 11-Hz water
linewidth). Optimal sensitivity of spectra can be seen, with the last 8.5-min
averaged acquisition (107-min) showing low-concentration 13C
metabolites such as Lac-H2, Ala-H3, Asp-H3, and Asp-H2 in addition to the
prominent Glu and Gln complexes.
After 112-mins of time-resolved spectra,
the [1,6-13C2]-Glc infusion was maintained to accommodate
two 8.5-min in vivo scans each, with the SEAL-PRESS and 12.6-ms PRESS-POCE sequences for comparison (see Fig 3c)
in an interleaved fashion (A=>B=>B=>A).
Reduced
T2 and homonuclear J-evolution related losses, as a result of reducing TE from
12.6-ms to 8.1-ms, improved 13C
labeled metabolite signal by >17% (see Fig 3d).Conclusion
We present a single-shot PRESS-localized and
two-shot edited POCE MRS sequence with TE = 8.1ms. The sequence implementation
is straightforward, immune to scanner instabilities and subtraction artifacts,
while providing high sensitivity due to the short TE.
Acknowledgements
This
research was funded by NSERC (Grant No. RGPIN-2014-07072) awarded to
JN.References
1. Rothman D et al. NMR Biomed,
2011;24(8):943-957.
2. Rothman
D et al. et al. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA, 1985;82:1633-1637.
3.
Kumaragamage C et al. MRM, 2017 [early
view].
4.
de
Graaf R et al. NMR Biomed, 2011;24(8):958-972.