Michael Pridmore1, Richard Dortch2, and Jun Li3
1Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 3Neurology, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
This project proposes a multi-parametric set of MRI tools for assaying
human inherited neuropathies in vivo, with the longer-term goal of establishing
biomarkers of disease progression for future clinical trials. Previous research
shows magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) values, which assay myelin content
changes from demyelination and axonal loss, relate to disability in neuropathy
patients. Here, we proposed additional fat-water (Dixon) imaging to assay fat replacement
following deinnervation. MTR/Dixon data were collected in the sciatic/tibial nerves in patients
with primary dysmyelinating inherited neuropathies. Longitudinal results showed
lower that MTR/Dixon were responsive to disease progression.
Purpose
Promising treatments are on
the horizon for a number of inherited neuropathies. However, the evaluation of
therapies in human trails is hindered by lack of responsive biomarkers. The CMT
neuropathy score (CMTNS) is a composite disability score proposed as a
biomarker of CMT progression [4].
Unfortunately, the CTMNS was previously unable to detect progression over a
two-year period. More recently, assay of muscle denervation via fat-water MRI
has shown promise as a responsive biomarker [5]. This work hypothesizes
that direct assay of nerve pathology via nerve MRI will yield biomarkers that
are more sensitive to disease progression.
To test this, we
develop a multi-parametric set of MRI tools for assaying human inherited
neuropathies in vivo. Magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) MRI provides
information on myelin content changes from both demyelination and axonal loss
[1]; and we previously demonstrated that MTR in proximal nerves relates to disability
in patients with inherited neuropathies [2]. Here, we extend our
protocol to the distal nerves of the leg to characterize the length-dependent
(i.e., dying back) nature of certain neuropathies. More specifically, we
scanned individuals with Hereditary Neuropathy with Liabilities to Pressure
Palsies (HNPP), a primary dysmyelinating neuropathy with secondary axonal loss.
Both the proximal (sciatic) and distal nerves (tibial) of the leg were scanned longitudinally
to assess the ability of MTR to detect change over time. We additionally
performed fat-water (Dixon) MRI for comparison.Methods
MTR/Dixon values were measured in four HNPP individuals (36–65 y.o.) proximal
to the knee (sciatic nerve) and ankle (tibial nerve) at two timepoints (12.2
months apart). Age/gender-matched controls were scanned for comparison. Data
acquisition: MTR data were acquired via a 3D, multi-shot EPI sequence acquired with
and without application of an MT-prepulse (1000° nominal flip angle, 1.5 kHz off-resonance)
and the following: resolution=0.8×0.8×6 mm3, TR/TE=60/11 ms,
water-selective excitation pulse (10°), k-space lines per shot=5, SENSE
factor=1, NEX=2, and total scan time ≈6 min. The RF
transmit field (B1) was estimated using the actual flip angle imaging approach,
and MTR values were corrected for B1 variations as previously described [1]. Finally, Dixon
fat-water data were acquired via a six-echo gradient echo sequence
(resolution=0.75×0.75×3 mm3, TR/first TE/echo spacing=300/13/18 ms,
and total scan time ≈2
min). B1-corrected MTR maps were estimated using our previously published method [1], and mean slice-wise
MTR values were calculated for sciatic/tibial nerves. For MTR, ROIs were
manually selected for the sciatic/tibial nerves and mean slice-wise MTR
parameters were estimated. For Dixon, the entire muscle was segmented and the
median fat percentage (Fper) tabulated [3]. Results
Figure 1 shows the anatomical proton density (PD), MTR,
and Dixon maps in the thigh
(sciatic nerve) for a representative patient and control subject. Likewise, Figure 2 shows the
anatomical proton density (PD), MTR, and Dixon maps in the ankle (tibial nerve)
for a representative patient and control subject. Summary results for MTR and
Dixon values each timepoint and cohort (control/HNPP) are reported in Table 1. For HNPP individuals at
the first scan, mean (±SD) MTR values demonstrated a length-dependent effect,
with higher values in the sciatic nerve (39.24±2.93%) relative to the tibial
nerve (36.20±1.97%). In the second session, this length-dependent effect was
reduced in the thigh (36.01±1.66%) compared to the ankle (35.15±2.03%) in
individuals with HNPP. Furthermore, sciatic nerve MTR values showed a trend toward
a decrease within this small cohort (p=0.08). Fat percentage (Fper) values also detected a trend
toward a change over time in the thigh (session1/2=8.76/7.01%, p=0.11) and ankle (8.87/7.34%, p=0.11).
Significant differences between patients and matched controls for MTR/Dixon in
the thigh were observed in timepoint 2 (MTR:p=0.02, Fper:p=0.04) but not in
timepoint 1 or across ankle data, which may be indicative of the mild
impairment in the HNPP cohort and/or the small sample size of both our patient
and control groups.Discussion and Conclusions
Multi-parametric MRI may detect length-dependent pathological changes in
the proximal and distal nerves of the leg of individuals with inherited
neuropathies. Future directions include enrolling a larger cohort of patients and
controls to: 1) quantitatively compare the responsiveness of each measure to
disease progression and 2) correlate findings with clinical neuropathy scores. If
successful, these studies will provide responsive biomarkers of CMT progression.Acknowledgements
NIH/NIBIB K25-EB13659 and T32 EB014841-05 for
funding.References
[1] Dortch, et al. Neurology 83:1545–1553 (2014). [2]
Schmierer, et al. Ann Neurology 56(3):407-415 (2004). [3] Smith et al. 20th
Scientific Meeting of ISMRM Abstract #2413 (2012). [4] Shy, et al. Neurology
64:1209-1214 (2005). [5] Morrow, et al. The Lancet Neurology 15:65-77 (2016).