Huiling Peng1, Alyssa Smith1, Kelly Boland1, and Jason Craggs1
1University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
Synopsis
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is now considered a
disease of the central nervous system. Two-thirds
of individuals with CLBP also have fibromyalgia (FM) which is a chronic pain
syndrome characterized by widespread deep musculoskeletal pain and cognitive
deficits. The aim of this study was to investigate gray and
white matter changes between FM and CLBP groups using vertex analysis of thalamus
and tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). Significant
surface depression was detected in right thalamus of patients with FM compare
to CLBP. TBSS analysis showed significantly reduced FA in several white matter
tracts of patients with FM compared to CLBP.
Introduction
Low
back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide1 with
approximately 10% of LBP patients develop chronic low back pain (CLBP). Despite
the lack of clear pathology in CLBP, it is now considered a disease of the
central nervous system (CNS) 2. Studies using magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) have reported volumetric change in gray matter (GM) and white
matter (WM) of CLBP at cortical and subcortical levels compared to healthy
controls 3-5. More recent studies utilizing diffusion tensor imaging
(DTI) methods have reported an altered WM integrity, as measured via fractional
anisotropy (FA), in disabled compared to non-disabled CLBP, and in
pre-treatment compared to post-treatment CLBP 6-7. Meanwhile, as
many as two-thirds of individuals with CLBP also have fibromyalgia (FM) which
is a chronic pain syndrome characterized by widespread deep musculoskeletal
pain and cognitive deficits 8. Studies suggest that FM is associated
with structural changes in the CNS including part of the somatosensory system
and part of the motor system 9. Understanding the distinctive neural
mechanisms between CLBP and FM is crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate GM and WM changes in
individuals with FM compared to individuals with CLBP. Specifically, studies
have suggested that the thalamus is an important structure that mediates
different components of pain: sensory discriminative (later pain pathway) and
affective-motivational (medial pain pathway) components 10-11. Given
the important role of thalamus as a relay between spinal and cortical
structures, we examine in this study changes in thalamic morphometry via
semi-automated MRI-based segmentation. Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS,
FSL) was also used to perform an extensive examination of white matter fiber
tract-specific changes between FM and CLBP groups.Methods
A
sample of 48 individuals with CLBP and 22 FM individuals of similar age
participated in this study. A 3T Siemens Trio MRI scanner with a standard
8-channel head coil (Erlangen, Germany) was used to obtain high-resolution
T1-weighted structural images and single-shot spin-echo echo-planar DTI
(SE-EPI-DTI) images of the whole brain. Following acquisition, automated
segmentation of the thalamus was performed on T1-weighted images using FIRST,
FMRIB’s Integrated Registration and Segmentation Tool 12. Vertex
analysis software then estimates thalamic shape and size with fixed number of
vertices. The vertex locations from each subject are projected onto the surface
normal of the average shape in MIN152 space. The projection values representing
the perpendicular distance from the average surface were stored in a 4D file
and group analysis was performed using randomize (FSL, Oxford, UK). Meanwhile, FA
maps from all subjects’ DTI data were aligned into MNI152 space using nonlinear
registration. The mean FA image was then created and thinned to create a mean
FA skeleton. Each subject’s aligned FA data was then projected onto this
skeleton, and the resulting 4D FA skeleton data was fed into voxel-wise
cross-subject statistics. A randomize procedure (FSL) was used to perform the
group analysis (500 permutations). A restrictive statistical threshold was used
(cluster-based threshold p < .05,
corrected for multiple comparisons).Results and Discussion
As
anticipated, we found changes of thalamic morphometry in FM compared to CLBP
(Figure 1). The vertex analysis showed significant group differences in right
thalamic shape. Compared to the CLBP group, the FM group was associated with
significant surface depression in right thalamus (p < .05). Oppositely, the left thalamus did not show any
significant morphometric differences between FM and CLBP groups. TBSS analysis
showed significantly reduced FA in several white matter tracts of individuals
with FM compared to CLBP, including right superior longitudinal fasciculus
(slf), right posterior thalamic radiation (ptr), right sagittal stratum (ss),
and bilateral corpus callosum (cc) (Figure 2). This finding suggests that patients
with FM had distinct abnormalities (in locations and/or degree) in thalamic
morphometry and WM microstructural integrity compared with patients with CLBP. Although
the precise mechanisms underlying these changes remains unclear, observed
reduction of GM and WM integrity may represent a progressive degenerative pain
processing, which might reflect the long-term experience of widespread deep
pain in FM. Except for the interhemispheric corpus callosum, our results showed
an abnormal pattern of laterality in both GM and WM changes. Additional research
examining the relationship between these white matter abnormalities and subcortical
changes is needed.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Hoy D et al, Ann Rheu Dis. 2014; 73:968-74. [2] Melzack
R et al, J Dent Rduc. 2001; 65:1378-82. [3] Apkarian AV et al, J
Neurosci. 2004; 24:10410-15. [4] Balike MN et al, PLoS One. 2011;
6:e26010. [5] Buckalew N et al, Pain med. 2008; 9:240-48. [6] Buckalew N
et al, Pain Med. 2010; 11:1183-97. [7] Ceko M et al, Hum Brain
Mapp. 2015; 36:2075-92. [8] Wolfe F et al, Arthritis Rheum. 1990;
33:160-72. [9] Schmidt-Wilcke T et al, Pain. 2007; 132 Suppl 1:S109-16.
[10] Andersson JL et al, Exp Brain Res. 1997; 117(2):192–99. [11] Royce
GJ et al, J Comp Neurol. 1985; 235(3):277–300. [12] Patenaude B et al, Neuroimage.
2011; 56(3):907-22.