Nesmine R Maptue1, Weina Jiang1, Alexander M Funk1, Wei Chen1, Craig R Malloy1,2,3,4, A. Dean Sherry1,2,5, and Chalermchai Khemtong1,2
1Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 2Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 3Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 4Veteran Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX, United States, 5Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States
Synopsis
13C-MRI HP 13C-bicarbonate (H13CO3-)
and carbon dioxide (13CO2) is a novel technique for
tissue pH mapping. Here, we report 13C-enriched ethyl acetyl
carbonate (13C-EAC) for esterase-catalyzed production of HP-13CO2 and
HP-H13CO3- for pH measurements. Our results
showed that 13C-EAC was rapidly hydrolyzed by esterase to 13C-monoacetyl
carbonate, which decomposed to HP-13CO2. Equilibrium
between the newly produced 13CO2 and H13CO3-
was established and the 13C-NMR signals can be quantified for pH
measurements. Finally, in vivo pH measurements using H-13C-EAC was demonstrated
in rat livers. These results suggest that HP-13C-EAC is a novel
imaging probe for in vivo pH measurements of tissues.
Introduction
The ratio of CO2 to HCO3-
has been used as an index of tissue pH using hyperpolarized (HP) 13C-MRI (1). Various salts of 13C-enriched
bicarbonate (H13CO3-) and CO2-precurosrs can
be polarized using DNP and upon dissolution, the resulting HP-H13CO3-
rapidly equilibrates to form HP-13CO2 (2-4). The short T1 and low polarization
levels of 13C-bicarbonate salts remain major challenges for this method.
In this study, we report the development of HP 13C-enriched mixed anhydrides
as esterase-sensitive precursors (Fig. 1) for the HP 13CO2
and H13CO3- buffer pair for tissue pH
measurement. We hypothesized that the ester functional group of mixed
anhydrides can be readily hydrolyzed by enzyme esterase, producing HP-H13CO3-/13CO2
that can be imaged for estimating tissue pH.Methods
13C-enriched ethyl acetyl
carbonate (13C-EAC) was synthesized from 13C-enrihced
ethyl chloroformate and acetic acid and isolated as a clear liquid. 13C-EAC was polarized neat for 2 h in a HyperSense polarized using BDPA
(40 mM) as a radical. For T1 and signal enhancement measurements, dissolution of HP 13C-EAC was done using
ethanol ([EAC] = 2 mM) and 13C NMR spectra were acquired at 9.4 T. For hydrolysis studies
of HP 13C-EAC, 2 mL of HP 13C-EAC in PBS was mixed with 2 mL of rat plasma or rat
liver homogenate ([13C-EAC] = 2 mM, 37 °C). Series of 13C
NMR spectra were acquired with a delay time of 2 s with 10-deg pulses. In vivo
pH measurements of rat livers were done in a 4.7T small animal scanner. Healthy
Sprague-Dawley rats (250-350 g) were injected with HP 13C-EAC via a tail vein
catheter (3 mL, 80 mM). 13C NMR spectra were acquired with 10-deg pulses every
3 s using a volume coil. pH values were calculated from H13CO3-/13CO2
intensity ratios.Results and Discussions
A polarization buildup of
13C-EAC is shown in
Figure 2A.
13C-EAC polarization reached the maximum level in a very
short time (~30 min). T
1 of
13C-EAC measured at 9.4T was
30 s. The liquid state signal enhancement of this HP probe was ~35,000-fold, corresponding
to ~28% polarization. Some degree of HP-
13C-EAC hydrolysis was
observed in PBS as confirmed by the presence of
13C-enriched monoacetyl
carbonate (
13C-MAC) at 159.4 ppm (Fig. 3).
13CO
2
and H
13CO
3- resonances are also visible at 124.5
and 160.0 ppm, respectively.
13C NMR spectra of HP
13C-EAC
in plasma and liver homogenate show strong peaks of
13C-MAC,
13CO
2,
and H
13CO
3-. As expected, signal intensities of
all
13C-EAC hydrolyzed products are much more pronounced in these
biological samples. The presence of enzyme esterase caused rapid hydrolysis of
HP-
13C-EAC to HP
13C-MAC. The signal-intensity plot of (Fig.
3B) confirms that HP-
13C-MAC was produced instantly in plasma and
liver homogenate. A HP-
13C spectrum of the liver summed over 21-s
period after HP
13C-EAC injection is shown in Figure 4A. Our results
showed that HP
13C-MAC,
13CO
2, and H
13CO
3-
peaks appeared soon after the injection of HP
13C-EAC. HP
13C-EAC
signal was very small compared to its downstream metabolites, indicating that
13C-EAC
hydrolysis by esterase is very rapid in vivo. Although the HP
13C-MAC
and HP H
13CO
3- peaks in this in vivo result are
somewhat overlapped, the two resonances are resolved. Intensities of H
13CO
3-
and
13CO
2 in the liver quantified by Gaussian peak
fittings are plotted as a function of time in Figure 4B. A ratio between HP-H
13CO
3-
and HP-
13CO
2 signal intensities was calculated over 21 s
(7 time points) while HP
13CO
2 signal intensity can be
reliably measured. From these values, the average HP-H
13CO
3--
13CO
2
signal intensity ratio was 11.9:1, agreeing well with the reported value (5).
pH value of the liver was estimated from the calculated intensity ratios (1).
The average pH value over this period from 7 values was 7.24 ± 0.08. Interestingly, this value agrees very well
with the intracellular pH measured by
31P NMR (6, 7).
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that tissue pH can
be measured in vivo using HP 13C-EAC. Taking advantage of the
abundant and fast mammalian enzymes esterase and carbonic anhydrase, HP 13CO2
and H13CO3- can be rapidly produced in situ
and tissue pH can be calculated from HP 13C signal ratios of the
physiological buffer pair. The long T1, good chemical stability, and
high polarization level of HP 13C-EAC are also advantageous for HP 13C
imaging applications, potentially allowing for pre-injection quality control
procedures such as radical removal without a significant signal loss. The
results suggest that HP 13C-EAC is an attractive pH imaging agent for
in vivo assessment of abnormal tissue pH associated with many diseases. Acknowledgements
We thank the following agencies for financial support:
NIH 2P41-EB015908 (CRM), NIH 5R37-HL034557 (ADS), and W81XWH-12-1-0134 (CK).References
- Gallagher
FA, Kettunen MI, Day SE, Hu DE, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, et al. 2008. Nature 453: 940-3
- Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Brindle
KM. 2011. NMR Biomed 24: 1006-15
- Ghosh RK, Kadlecek SJ, Pourfathi M,
Rizi RR. 2015. Magn Reson Med 74:
1406-13
- Korenchan DE, Flavell RR, Baligand
C, Sriram R, Neumann K, et al. 2016. Chem
Commun 52: 3030-3
- Kerber RC. 2003. Journal of Chemical Education 80: 1437-8
- Cunningham CC, Malloy CR, Radda GK.
1986. Biochim Biophys Acta 885: 12-22
- Malloy CR, Cunningham CC, Radda GK.
1986. Biochim Biophys Acta 885: 1-11