Feng Wang1,2, Tung-Lin Wu1,3, Ke Li1, Li Min Chen1,2, and John C. Gore1,2,3
1Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
High-resolution
quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) MRI provides a noninvasive means to detect
and characterize myelination before and after neural injury and during repair. This
study aims to systematically evaluate the accuracy and precision of pool size
ratio (PSR) measurements using either 5-, 2- or 1-parameter modeling for assessing
injury-associated changes in spinal cords in squirrel monkeys in order to
optimize a rapid, sensitive, and high-resolution PSR mapping protocol for
applications in primates at high field.
In addition, the sensitivity of PSR to demyelination in the dorsal
pathway rostral and caudal to an injury site has been evaluated.
Introduction
Demyelination
is a hallmark of the effects of spinal cord injury (SCI), and quantitative
magnetization transfer (qMT) MRI provides a noninvasive means to detect and
grade myelination after an injury and during repair. This study aims to systematically evaluate the
accuracy and precision of estimates of pool size ratio (PSR) from qMT using
different modeling approaches in data analyses for monitoring injury-associated
changes in the spinal cords of squirrel monkeys. A primary goal is to optimize
a rapid, sensitive and high-resolution PSR mapping protocol for assessing SCI
in primates at high field.Methods
MRI scans were performed in anesthetized squirrel monkeys
at 9.4T, before and after a unilateral dorsal column lesion of the cervical
spinal cord. Quantitative
MT data were collected for a coronal slice (Fig.
1), using a 2D MT-weighted spoiled gradient recalled-echo sequence (TR 24 ms,
flip angle = 7°, resolution = ~0.313x0.313x1 mm3, 32
acquisitions). Gaussian-shaped saturation pulses (θsat
= 220° and 820°, pulse width = 12 ms) were used
with 12 RF
offsets spaced at constant logarithmic intervals between 1 and 100 kHz. Histological
sections using myelination stains were obtained post mortem for comparison.
MRI data were analyzed using MATLAB. A 5-parameter model,1 and 2- and 1-parameter
models2 with a reduced number of RF
offsets were applied to derive estimates of PSR. 5Pfit derives from 5-parameter fitting using all the qMT data. 2Pfit
represents 2-parameter fitting results using only 2-6 RF offsets (defined as 2Pfit(2RF),
2Pfit(3RF), 2Pfit(4RF), 2Pfit(5RF), and 2Pfit(6RF) respectively). Direct 1-parameter measures with different RF
offset pairs (one at 100 kHz), are denoted by the other selected RF offset e.g.
820RF4 (~3.5 kHz), 820RF5 (~5.3 kHz), 820RF6 (~8.1 kHz), 820RF7 (~12.3 kHz) and
820RF8 (~18.7 kHz) for data obtained with θsat
820°, and 220RF1 (1 kHz),
220RF2 (~1.5 kHz), 220RF3 (~2.3 kHz), 220RF4 (~3.5 kHz), and 220RF5 (~5.3 kHz)
for data using θsat 220°. Numerical
simulations were also performed to test modeling performance for different approaches
and SNR.3 The regional correlations between PSR from
different approaches were calculated using the Pearson correlation function,
and it was assumed that 5Pfit was the most accurate method of analysis. The
significance of PSR differences was evaluated using Student’s t-tests. Results
The performance of different data
analyses was systematically evaluated for the simulated data. Higher SNR and
a larger number of RF offsets significantly reduced experimental errors and variance
(Fig. 2a). At least 3 RF offsets are
required in 2Pfit to retain comparable accuracy and precision as that obtained
from 5Pfit with 12 RF offsets (Fig. 2a). The 1-parameter calculation requires
higher SNR (more than 1.5 times) to approach comparable accuracy and precision as
5Pfit with 12 RF offsets (Fig. 2a). The 1-parameter calculation is very
sensitive to RF offset and power, but the optimum offset and power can be
determined. Relative bias in PSR value was estimated for 2-parameter fitting
(Fig. 2b).
All the selected modeling approaches detected
the lesion/cyst as a change in PSR at the site of injury (Fig. 3a). However,
the regional contrasts in PSR maps from the different approaches varied, with
2Pfit showing strong positive correlations with 5Pfit (Fig. 3b). The variations
from 1-parameter measures were large across RF offsets, powers and sessions at
the experimental SNR (~75), and 820RF6 and 220RF3 showed stronger correlations
with 5Pfit than measures using other selected RF offsets for 1-parameter
modeling (Fig. 3b). Histology confirmed that reduced values of PSR corresponded
to demyelination along the dorsal pathway on the injury side (Fig. 4). The
rostral side (to the lesion) showed more severe demyelination than the caudal
side in the representative injured subjects (Fig. 4). The optimum 2- and 1-parameter
approaches were very sensitive in detecting cysts (Fig. 5a), and they also provided
comparable sensitivity as 5-parameter modeling to detect regional demyelination
and loss of macromolecules around the injury site (Fig. 5a). The decrease of
PSR in GM (Fig. 5a) was not as evident as that in the dorsal pathway. The
results from 2- or 1-parameter modeling could underestimate PSR of cyst (Fig.
5b), due to the relative bias (Fig. 3b) caused by fixing RaT2a, T2b,
and RM0a when their actual values are very different in cyst.4Conclusions
These results support the
use of the optimized 2- or 1-parameter approaches for qMT imaging of injured spinal
cord as a means to reduce total imaging time and/or permit additional signal
averaging. PSR detected demyelination rostral and caudal to lesions, especially in
the dorsal pathway on the lesion side.Acknowledgements
We
thank Mrs. Chaohui Tang and Mr. Fuxue Xin of the Vanderbilt University
Institute of Imaging Science for their assistance in animal preparation and
care in MRI data collection. This study is supported by DOD grant W81XWH-17-1-0304,
and NIH
grants NS092961, NS078680, and NS093669.References
1. Ramani,
A., et al., Precise estimate of
fundamental in-vivo MT parameters in human brain in clinically feasible times.
Magn Reson Imaging, 2002. 20(10): 721-31.
2. Underhill,
H.R., et al., Fast bound pool fraction
imaging of the in vivo rat brain: Association with myelin content and validation
in the C6 glioma model. Neuroimage, 2011. 54(3): 2052-2065.
3. Cercignani,
M. and D.C. Alexander, Optimal
acquisition schemes for in vivo quantitative magnetization transfer MRI.
Magn Reson Med, 2006. 56(4): 803-10.
4. Wang, F., et al., Longitudinal
Assessment of Spinal Cord Injuries in Nonhuman Primates with Quantitative
Magnetization Transfer. Magn Reson Med, 2016. 75(4): 1685-1696.