Zhuo Shi1, Lizhi Xie2, Peng Wang1, XinMing Zhao1, and Han Ou-Yang1
1National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, 2GE Healthcare, China, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Dynamic
contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI provides additional information regarding
blood-brain barrier integrity, and Ktrans is directly proportional
to the level of permeability of the blood-brain barrier. In our study, we found
demonstrates that SRS of cerebral metastasis is associated with a reduction of
Ktrans values in the early post-treatment period. DCE-MRI derived
parameters of may be a promising imaging biomarker of tumor aggressiveness.
Introduction
Cerebral metastases are
the most common intracranial tumors in adults and occur in approximately 15–25
% of all cancer patients . Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive
alternative to surgical resection of brain metastasis. Radiological criteria to
evaluate the response of brain metastases to SRS in the early post-treatment
period have not been well established. Therefore, an imaging method that could
be used to detect early tumor response would be helpful in identifying the true
early response of the tumor after SRS treatment. Purpose
Dynamic contrast-enhanced
(DCE) MRI provides additional information regarding blood-brain barrier
integrity, and Ktrans is directly proportional to the level of
permeability of the blood-brain barrier. The purpose of this study was to
evaluate the effect of SRS on cerebral metastases with Ktrans
that was assessed using DCE MRI. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the ability
of Ktrans measurements to predict midterm tumor outcomes after SRS.Materials and Methods
All patients underwent a
single high-dose SRS performed using a Clinac 6EX photon linear accelerator
(Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Seven patients received whole-brain radiation
therapy prior to SRS with a mean dose of 3,000 cGy divided into ten fractions.
MRI was performed in Optima MR360 (GE, Waukesha, WI, USA). DCE MRI was added to
the usual brain tumor protocols using a spoiled gradient-echo acquisition. Fifty dynamic
phases were obtained with a temporal sampling interval of 6s and a total
imaging time of 6.1 min. The bolus injection of 0.1 mmol/Kg of the contrast
agent was administered after the second set
of dynamic images at a rate of 2.5 mL/s. DCE MRI data were then processed.
Parametric maps were used to measure Ktrans at the regions of
interest (ROIs), and the highest (maximum) values were used for analysis, the
tumor volumes were subsequently calculated. All statistical analyses were
performed with SPSS 19.0, the relationship between Ktrans and tumor
volume was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, hazard
ratios (HRs) for the association between Ktrans and midterm tumor
progression were obtained using Cox proportional hazard models.Results
The Ktrans of
the metastatic lesions presented a significant reduction after SRS treatment.
The mean (±SD) Ktrans value was 0.13±0.11 min−1 at the
baseline and 0.08±0.07 min−1 at the early post treatment follow-up (p<0.001) (Figure.1).
There was a significant positive correlation between the Ktrans
ratio and the tumor growth ratio (Spearman’s coefficient=0.58, p=0.005). The
mean baseline Ktrans values were not significantly correlated with the
mean midterm tumor volumes. An increase in the Ktrans ratio was
significantly associated with lesion progression. Each unit increase in the Ktrans
ratio after SRS was associated with an added risk of 50 % of tumor progression
(HR=1.50, 95 % CI=1.16–1.70, p<0.001) (Table.1). The Ktrans ratio
showed a sensitivity of 78 % and a specificity of 85 % when a cutoff of 0.15
(increase of 15 %) for predicting midterm lesion outcomes (Figure.2).Conclusion
This study demonstrates
that SRS of cerebral metastasis is associated with a reduction of Ktrans
values in the early post-treatment period. Furthermore, Ktrans
variation is predictive of midterm tumor outcome. These results suggest that
DCE MRI Ktrans may be a valuable biomarker to evaluate treatment
responses in the early post-SRS period during which the identification of
treatment failure is more critical. Further large-scale studies may provide a
proof of the potential capability of this new method and could also evaluate
its performance when combined with other MRI techniques.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Rahman M, Cox JB, Chi
YY et al. Radiographic response of brain metastasis after linear accelerator
radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2012; 90:69–78.
2. Kassner A, Thornhill R.
Measuring the integrity of the human blood-brain barrier using magnetic
resonance imaging. Methods Mol Biol 2011; 686:229–245.
3. Zhang N, Zhang L, Qiu
B et al. Correlation of volume transfer coefficient Ktrans with histopathologic
grades of gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36:355–363.
4. Thompson G, Mills SJ,
Stivaros SM, Jackson A. Imaging of brain tumors: perfusion/permeability.
Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2010; 20:337–353.
5. Peng SL, Chen CF, Liu
HL, et al. Analysis of parametric histogram from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI:
application in evaluating brain tumor response to radiotherapy. NMR Biomed 2012.