Synopsis
Glaucoma is a neurodegenerative
disease that can cause irreversible vision loss. Elevated intraocular pressure
is a major risk factor for the glaucoma; however, the disease may still
progress in some patients after lowering IOP. Citicoline has been suggested as
a potential therapeutic to ameliorate damage caused by neurodegenerative
diseases, including glaucoma, but its neuroprotective effects remain
incompletely studied. In this study, we analyzed the dose-dependent effect of
oral citicoline on visual behavior response and white matter integrity in a
rodent model of glaucoma. The results show citicoline preserves visual behavior
response and visual system integrity in a dose dependent manner.
Introduction
Glaucoma is a
neurodegenerative disease that causes irreversible vison over time, making it
the second leading cause of blindness worldwide. Elevated intraocular pressure
(IOP) is a risk factor associated with glaucoma, and while lowering IOP is a
clinically accepted method to slow the progression of the disease, degeneration
of the visual system may still occur after lowering the IOP1. Citicoline
is an endogenous compound that acts in the biosynthetic pathway of cellular
membrane synthesis, and recent studies suggest citicoline may be improve visual
function outcome in glaucoma patients2,3. In this study, we used an
experimental glaucoma model to elevate IOP for up to 5 weeks and treated two
groups of animals with varying doses of citicoline. The effects of citicoline
on visual behavior response and white matter integrity were analyzed with
optokinetics and MR neuroimaging. Methods
Animal preparation:
18 adult Long Evans received an
intracameral injection of a crosslinking hydrogel4 that solidified to an optically clear hydrogel shortly
after injection. The right eyes of all animals were injected and the left eye was
uninjured and used as internal control. The 18 animals were divided into three
groups: 1. Gel injection only (untreated, n=6), 2. low-dose citicoline (n=6),
and 3. high-dose citicoline (n=6). The
12 animals in groups 2 and 3 received daily oral citicoline treatment (500mg/kg
and 2500mg/kg, respectively) for 7 days prior to hydrogel injection, and every
48 hours for 14 days after hydrogel injection.
IOP measurements: IOP
was measured for 35 days after hydrogel injection with a handheld tonometer (ICare,
Finland). A total of 18 measurements were averaged for each eye.
Optokinetics: Visual
behavior response was measured with an OptoMotry virtual reality system
(CerebralMechanics) for 35 days after hydrogel injection5,6.
MRI protocol: Diffusion
tensor imaging was done at 35 days after hydrogel injection using a 9.4T MRI
scanner. DTI was acquired with a fast-spin echo sequence with 12 diffusion gradient
directions at b=1.0ms/μm2
and 2 non-diffusion-weighted images at b=0ms/μm2 (b0). Other
imaging parameters included: slice thickness=1mm, acquisition matrix= 192x192 (zero-filled to 256×256), field of view=2.6x2.6cm2, number of
repetitions=4, diffusion
gradient duration time (δ)/diffusion gradient separation time (Δ)=5/17ms,
ETL=8, and TR/TE= 2300/27.8ms. Slices were oriented orthogonal to the
prechiasmatic optic nerves.
MRI
data analysis: Fractional
anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial
diffusivity (RD) were computed using DSIStudio. Regions of interest were
manually drawn on the prechiasmatic optic nerve and the optic tract with
reference to the rat brain atlas. DTI values were calculated as ratios between
visual pathways projected from the IOP elevated eyes and the contralateral
control eyes. Values were compared between untreated, low-dose citicoline, and high-dose
citicoline groups using ANOVA and post-hoc multiple comparisons correction
tests. Results are presented as average ± standard error of mean.Results
Intracameral
injection of the cross-linking hydrogel to the right eyes significantly
elevated the IOP in all animals for up to 35 days, with no statistical difference
between the untreated, 500mg/kg citicoline treated, or 2500mg/kg citicoline
treated animals (Fig. 1). The IOP of the left uninjured eyes remained unchanged
over time. The visual acuity (VA) of the right untreated, low-dose citicoline,
and high-dose citicoline animals decreased as early as at day 7. The VA of the
untreated animals decreased further to day 14 and 35, while the VA of the citicoline
treated animals stabilized at day 14, with the high dose animals having a
significantly higher VA than the untreated animals (Fig. 2a). At the end
experimental time point, untreated animals had 45% difference in VA between
left and right eyes, whereas low and high dose citicoline treatment resulted in
25% and 10% VA difference, respectively (Figure 2b). The decreases in FA in the
optic tract and AD in the optic nerve were significantly smaller in the
2500mg/kg animals compared to untreated animals (Fig. 3). Interestingly, both
low and high citicoline dose resulted in less than 5% difference in FA between
left and right optic nerves at day 35, as compared to 25% difference in the
untreated group.Discussion and conclusions
Our results indicate
oral citicoline administration ameliorates changes in the visual behavior
response and white matter integrity after 5 weeks of IOP elevation in an
experimental glaucoma model under both low and high citicoline doses. These
results appear consistent with recent literature which suggests citicoline can
slow down neurodegeneration and improve functional outcomes7. The
fact that VA continued to improve at increasing citicoline dose while FA
differences between injured and uninjured optic nerves remained similar at both
doses, suggests that citicoline may act both on the optic nerve axons and
beyond8.Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by the National Institutes of Health P30-EY008098 and R01-EY028125
(Bethesda, Maryland); BrightFocus Foundation G2013077 and G2016030 (Clarksburg,
Maryland), Eye and Ear Foundation (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania); and Research to
Prevent Blindness (New York, New York).References
[1] Susanna, R.,
Jr., De Moraes, C.G., Cioffi, G.A. & Ritch, R. Why Do People (Still) Go
Blind from Glaucoma? Transl Vis Sci Technol 4, 1 (2015).
[2] Grieb, P.,
Rejdak, R. Pharmacodynamics of citicoline relavant to the treatment of
glaucoma. J Neurosci Res 14;67 (2002)
[3] Parisi, V.,
Coppola, G., Centofanti, M., Oddone, F., Angrisani, AM., Ziccardi, L., Ricci,
B., Quaranta, L., Manni, G. Evidence of the neuroprotective role of citicoline
in glaucoma patients. Prog Brain Res (2008)
[4] Ho LC, Sigal IA,
Jan N-J, Yang X, Merwe Y van der, Yu Y, Chau Y, Leung CK, Conner IP, Jin T, Wu
EX, Kim S-G, Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Chan KC. Non-invasive MRI Assessments of
Tissue Microstructures and Macromolecules in the Eye upon Biomechanical or Biochemical
Modulation. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 26;6:srep32080.
[5] Prusky, GT., Alam, NM., Beekman, S., Douglas, RM.,
Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a
virtual optomotor system. Invest
Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2004)
[6] Douglas, RM., Alam, NM., Silver, BD., McGill, TJ.,
Tschetter, WW., Prusky, GT. Independent visual threshold measurements in the
two eyes of freely moving rats and mice using a virtual-reality optokinetic
system. Vis Neurosci,5 (2005)
[7] Skripuletz, T., Manzel A, Gropengießer K, Schäfer N, Gudi V, Singh V, Salinas Tejedor
L, Jörg S, Hammer A, Voss E, Vulinovic F, Degen D, Wolf R, Lee DH, Pul R,
Moharregh-Khiabani D, Baumgärtner W, Gold R, Linker RA, Stangel M. Pivotal
role of choline metabolites in remyelination. Brain, 2015.
[8] Chamoun M., Sergeeva EG., Henrich-Noack P., Jia S.,
Grigartzik L., Ma J., You Q., Huppé-Gourgues F., Sabel BA., Vaucher E..Cholinergic
Potentiation of Restoration of Visual Function after Optic Nerve Damage in
Rats. Neural Plast.
2017