Ashley V Makela1,2, Jeffrey M Gaudet3, and Paula J Foster1,2
1Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 2Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada, 3Magnetic Insight Inc, Alameda, CA, United States
Synopsis
Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) is emerging as a
specific, quantitative and sensitive cellular imaging technique. MPI directly
detects a SPIO tracer as positive contrast, and this signal is linearly
quantifiable with zero tissue attenuation. Because of this, MPI is well suited
for in vivo cell tracking to image
tumor associated macrophages (TAMs). TAM content can be used as a biomarker to
predict tumor growth and metastatic potential. Mice bearing 4T1 and 168FARN tumors were
imaged post intravenous SPIO injection to investigate for the first time, the application
of MRI and MPI to differentiate between murine cancer models with varying
metastatic potentials.
Background
Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) is emerging as a specific, quantitative
and sensitive cellular imaging technique. It utilizes iron oxide nanoparticles
which are well known and used throughout the MRI community. Unlike MRI, which
presents with low specificity and challenging quantification, MPI directly
detects the SPIO tracer as positive contrast, and this signal is linearly
quantifiable with zero tissue attenuation. These features of MPI make it
attractive for quantifying cells in vivo in
multiple applications. One well
suited application would be imaging tumor associated macrophages (TAMs); they
are associated with tumor growth and metastatic potential.1 Increased numbers of
TAMs have been correlated with a poor prognosis and they can contribute up to 50%
of the mass in breast tumors.2 Previously, cellular
MRI has indirectly imaged the spatial distribution of TAMs, through the in
situ uptake of iron oxide nanoparticles, visualized as signal voids.3 In this study, we
investigated the first application of MRI and MPI to detect and differentiate
between murine breast cancer models with varying metastatic potentials. Methods
Female BALB/c mice were implanted with 300,000 4T1 (n=3) or 168FARN
(n=3) cells into the inguinal mammary fat pad. These two isogenic murine breast
cancer cell lines differ in metastatic potential (high and low, respectively) and
consequently, TAM density. Tumour
bearing mice were imaged at 3 weeks post cancer cell implantation, 24 hours
post intravenous injection of 100μL of VivoTrax (Magnetic Insight Inc.), a
superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO). One mouse from each group was first imaged
on a 3T clinical MRI (General Electric) with a custom-built gradient insert located
at Robarts Research Institute. A balanced steady-state free precession pulse
sequence was used with an imaging time of ~20 mins. The mice were then
sacrificed and fixed in formalin. MPI was performed by Magnetic Insight Inc.
with the Momentum MPI scanner (Magnetic Insight Inc.) alongside three reference
fiducials of known iron concentration. Iron quantification was performed with
VivoQuant (inviCRO) on sagittal projection images with a total MPI scan and
reconstruction time of 4 minutes. Tumor tissue was extracted for histological
examination. Results
MRI signal voids were observed within the 4T1 tumor (Fig. 1A),
predominately in the tumor periphery. Fewer voids with MRI were observed in the
168FARN tumor (Fig 1D). MPI signal was observed in all 4T1 tumors (Fig. 1B) but
only in 1/3 of the tumors in the 168FARN group (Fig. 1E), consistent with the
lower iron presence observed by MRI. MPI/MRI overlays (Figs. 1C&F) demonstrate
a similar location of the MPI positive signal and MRI signal voids, suggesting
these are both generated by the SPIO. MPI quantification of iron in the three 4T1
and one 168FARN tumors indicated an uptake of 5.5, 10.3 and 14.1 μg and 2.9 μg of
iron, respectively. Signal was always detectable in the liver, due to the
inherent phagocytic cells present. Liver and 4T1 tumor sections were stained
with nuclear fast red counterstain and suggest iron accumulation in cells, which appear as
dark brown (Fig. 3).Conclusions
By combining the high spatial resolution of MRI with the accurate
quantification and specificity of MPI, additional information can be obtained
on TAM presence and distribution. In addition to aiding therapeutic
development, this information could be utilized as a biomarker to predict how aggressive
a tumor may be.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Obeid
E, Nanda R, Fu YX, Olopade OI. The role of tumor-associated macrophages in
breast cancer progression. Int J Oncol. 2013;43(1):5-12.
doi:10.3892/ijo.2013.1938.
2. Bingle L, Brown NJ, Lewis
CE. The role of tumour-associated macrophages in tumour progression:
Implications for new anticancer therapies. J Pathol.
2002;196(3):254-265. doi:10.1002/path.1027.
3. Makela AV, Gaudet JM,
Foster PJ. Quantifying tumor associated macrophages in breast cancer: a
comparison of iron and fluorine-based MRI cell tracking. Sci Rep.
2017;7(42109).