Gastao Cruz1, Aurelien Bustin1, Olivier Jaubert1, Torben Schneider2, René M Botnar1, and Claudia Prieto1
1School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Philips Healthcare, Guildford, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Magnetic Resonance
Fingerprinting (MRF) estimates simultaneous, multi-parametric maps from a
dynamic series of highly undersampled time-point images. At very high
undersampling factors, some of these artefacts may propagate into the
parametric maps leading to errors. Here we propose the use of locally low rank
regularization for a low rank approximation reconstruction to enable highly
accelerated MRF. The proposed approach was evaluated in
simulations and in-vivo brain
acquisitions. Results show that the proposed approach enables
accurate MRF reconstructions from ~600 time-point images with one radial spoke
per time-point.
Introduction:
Magnetic Resonance
Fingerprinting (MRF1) acquires a series of highly undersampled time-point
images in a continuous magnetization transient state, varying sequence
parameters to produce tissue specific signal evolutions (fingerprints), which are matched to previously simulated signals (dictionary). MRF k-space
trajectories are designed to produce spatio-temporal incoherent
aliasing, however aliasing from high undersampling factors can propagate
into the parametric maps. Low rank approximations2,3,4 in MRF enable
higher acceleration factors than what initially proposed1. In steady-state
MRI approaches, locally low rank regularization has been used to further
accelerate the scans5,6,7. Here we combine low rank MRF approximation
and locally low rank regularization to improve parametric map quality and
achieve higher acceleration factors than the low rank approximation reconstruction.
The proposed approach was evaluated in simulations and in-vivo brain acquisitions.Methods:
Time-point images of an
MRF series are correlated, meaning that the time series can be compressed. This
temporal compression operator ($$$ \bf{U_r} $$$) can be obtained by truncating (to
the appropriate rank r) a singular
value decomposition of the MRF dictionary2. $$$ \bf{U_r} $$$ can be combined with SENSE by solving4: $$$ \bf{\hat {I}} = \it{arg min}_{I} || \bf{E U_r I - K} ||_2^2 $$$ ,
where $$$ \bf{\hat {I}} $$$ is the temporally compressed image series, $$$ \bf{E} $$$ is the SENSE encoding operator and $$$ \bf{K} $$$ is the acquired k-space. Local
low rank has been shown to be more compressible than global low rank in
several applications6,7, including parametric mapping. Here, we
include a local low rank regularization term in the existing low rank
approximation MRF reconstruction by solving:$$$ \bf{\hat {I}} = \it{arg min}_{I} || \bf{E U_r I - K} ||_2^2 + \lambda \sum_b {|| \bf{R_b I} ||_*} $$$ ,
where $$$ \bf{R_b} $$$ thresholds the singular value decomposition of an
image block b and $$$ \lambda $$$ controls the regularization strength. The
problem above was solved with the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers
(ADMM).Experiments:
A digital phantom modelled after a brain image
with realistic T1 and T2 values was used to simulate an
MRF acquisition with a sequence similar to8. The sampling was
simulated with a golden radial trajectory (one radial spoke per time-point),
known sensitivity coil maps and 1750 time-points. The simulated k-space data
was then undersampled uniformly in time by a factor of n (e.g. keeping [1:n:1750]
k-space lines, with n = [1, 2, 3, 4])
to obtain time-point series with Nt =
1750, 875, 584 and 438 images. Three healthy subjects were scanned in a 1.5T
Philips MR scanner using a 12-channel head coil and the same sequence as in
simulations. Acquisition parameters included: TE/TR=1.23/4.3 ms, 1750
time-points, one spoke per time-point, resolution=2x2 mm2, FOV=320x320
mm2 and 10 mm slice thickness. In-vivo
data was retrospectively undersampled in the same way as in simulations. All
datasets were reconstructed with the low rank approximation (LrMRF) and with
the locally low rank regularized low rank approximation (LLR-LrMRF). Both
reconstructions had a rank r = 15. The locally low rank had
a block size = 7 and local rank threshold = 5% of the maximum singular value.
In both reconstructions, the regularized data consistency term was solved with
the Conjugate Gradient algorithm with 15 iterations. The ADMM problem was
limited to 30 iterations. Results:
Time-point images for LrMRF and LLR-LrMRF are
shown in Fig.1 for different lengths of the time-point series, in simulation. Residual
aliasing artefacts can be seen in LrMRF even for 1750 time-points, which are
reduced with the proposed LLR-LrMRF. Corresponding parametric maps are shown in
Fig.2, where some of the artefacts present in the maps can also be seen in the
time-point images. Overall these artefacts are reduced with the proposed LLR-LrMRF
reconstruction, as are the root mean square relative errors of the parametric
maps. Time-point images from a representative subject for different lengths of
the time-point series are shown in Fig.3, in-vivo;
corresponding parametric maps are shown in Fig.4. Again, residual artefacts in LrMRF
are reduced with LLR-LrMRF even for 1750 time-points. LLR-LrMRF with 584
time-points achieves comparable parametric maps to LrMRF with 1750 time-points;
considerable artefacts are present when only 483 images are used.Conclusion:
A locally low rank regularization for the low
rank approximation reconstruction in MRF has been introduced and validated in
simulations and in-vivo. The proposed
method provides parametric maps from ~600
time-point images with one radial spoke per time-point and higher quality than
low rank approximation even for 1750 time-points. At reduced number of
time-point images, insufficient T1/T2 encoding is a potential limitation. Future work will consider new encodings (sequence parameter
combinations) for reduced number of time-point images and 3D acquisitions where
the increased acceleration provided by the proposed approach will be essential.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by EPSRC EP/P001009/1
and FONDECYT 1161055.References
1. Ma D et al, Nature
2013; 495:187-192
2. McGivney et al,
IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2014;33(12):2311-22
3. Doneva et al,
MRI 2017; doi:10.1016/j.mri.2017.02.007
4. Zhao
et al, MRM 2017; doi:10.1002/mrm.26701
5. Trzasko J et al,
ISMRM, 2011; abstract 4371
6. Zhang et al, MRM
2015; 73(2):655-61
7. Tamir et al, MRM
2017; 77(1):180-95
8. Jiang et al, MRM 2015;
74:1621-1631