Angiogenesis transforms gliomas from low-to-high-grade. Vasculature-properties are of essential prognostic-value within grade-III and IV glioma as compared to grade-II. High-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) improves the diagnostic accuracy1. Existing Semi-quantitative methods are user-dependent which manually counts intra-tumoral-susceptibility-signal-intensities (ITSS); a combination of haemorrhage and vasculature. Haemorrhage contributes to false ITSS-count and subsequently to misclassification of tumor-grading. We propose a non-invasive segmentation-based-quantitative approach that calculates the R2-Star relaxivity maps of ITSS, automatically removes haemorrhages from ITSS based on high-R2-Star relaxivity of haemorrhage and finally calculate microvasculature volume within glioma. The proposed-method scores over the existing semi-quantitative method in-terms-of ITSS-estimation and grading-accuracy.
This IRB-approved retrospective study included total 20 histology-confirmed glioma patients (10 each of grade III and IV). All patients underwent conventional-MRI and SWI on a 3.0T MRI scanner (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands). SWI was acquired with 4 echoes at at 5.6,11.8,18 and 24.2 ms (TR = 31ms; flip-angle 17°, slice thickness 1-mm, matrix 384×384, FOV 240×240 mm2). The SW-Magnitude images are obtained from scanner by multiplying fast-field-echo(FFE)-M image with a phase mask derived from PADRE (Phase-Difference-Enhanced-imaging) filtering process. PADRE algorithm calculates phase-mask from the homodyne-filtered phase image. The R2-Star maps were calculated using SWI-multi-echo magnitude images using below equation described by Haacke et.al4
$$R_2^* = - \frac{\sum_{m=2}^N {log(\frac{p_{m}}{p_{1}})*(TE_{m}-TE_{1})}}{\sum_{m=2}^N{(TE_{m}-TE_{1})^{2}}}$$
Thresholding and shape-based structuring element dependent algorithm developed in-house using MATLAB was used to segment ITSS from SWI-magnitude images for all the tumor slices. R2-Star values were picked for haemorrhage tissues from proven brain-haemorrhage data-pool (identified by expert radiologists) and those values were used as thresholds for detecting haemorrhage ITSS. Haemorrhages appear as large conglomerating blobs. Using this R2-Star threshold of haemorrhage a connected-component-shape-analysis segmentation algorithm was developed in MATLAB, which detects conglomerated haemorrhage ITSS blobs from all the tumor slices and filter them out. Remaining ITSS was considered to contribute to be microvasculature within the tumor. The microvasculature volume was computed over all the tumor slices through an in-house-developed algorithm. This volume calculation was done for all the 20 cases. Statistical unpaired-t-test was performed to check whether there is significant difference of microvasculature ITSS volume between grade-III and grade-IV cases. Also in-parallel ITSS-count and degree were taken based on Park-et-al’s semi-quantitative method. All these computations were finally compared with the histopathological grading results to compute accuracy of tumor-grading.
[1] Saini J, Gupta PK, Sahoo P, Singh A, Patir R, Ahlawat S,Beniwal M, Thennarasu K, Santosh V, Gupta RK.Differentiation of grade II/III and grade IV glioma by combining “T1 contrast-enhanced brain perfusion imaging” and susceptibility-weighted quantitative imaging. Neuroradiology, 2017 (online) [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-017-1942-8]
[2] Pinker K, Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Stavrou I, et al. High-resolution contrast-enhanced, susceptibility-weighted MR imaging at 3T in patients with brain tumors: correlation with positron-emission tomography and histopathologic findings AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1280–86
[3] Park MJ, Kim HS, Jahng GH, et al. Semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals using non-contrast-enhanced high-field high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with gliomas: comparison with MR perfusion imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Aug 2009: 30:1402– 08
[4] Haacke EM, Cheng NY, House MJ, et al. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 1–25.