Takegawa Yoshida1,2, Puja Shahrouki1,2, Kim-Lien Nguyen1,3, John M. Moriarty1,2, Stephen Kee2, and J Paul Finn1,2
1Diagnostic Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 3Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Synopsis
Accurate pre-procedural vascular mapping may be
crucial to guide successful intervention.
Whereas MRA provides excellent definition of the perfused vascular lumen,
it is insensitive to vascular calcification and may fail to image indwelling
devices. CTA can address the latter limitations, but may be contraindicated in
patients with renal impairment, as is the case for gadolinium based contrast
agents (GBCA). Our early results suggest
that, in patients with renal failure, 3D fusion of non-contrast CT and
ferumoxytol-enhanced MR images leverages the complementary strengths of both
modalities while avoiding both iodinated contrast agents and GBCA.
INTRODUCTION
Whereas magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)
provides excellent intraluminal contrast, it is insensitive to vascular
calcification and fails to image indwelling metal devices due to artifact1. Computed tomography (CT) is exquisitely sensitive to calcium and can
image a variety of indwelling hardware devices. However, CT angiography
requires injection of iodinated contrast agents, which are generally avoided in
renal impairment due to the attendant risk of nephrotoxicity. Similar concerns about nephrogenic systemic
fibrosis limit the use of GBCA in this patient population. We hypothesize that
in patients where ferumoxytol is a suitable alternative to CT angiography2,3, calcification and hardware devices may be accurately registered to vascular
luminal anatomy by fusing non-contrast CT and ferumoxytol enhanced MRA (FE-MRA)
images. In a proof-of-concept study, we aim to evaluate the feasibility of
FE-MRA and non-contrast CT image fusion for pre-procedural vascular assessment
of patients with renal impairment.METHODS
This is an IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant
study. Fifteen consecutive patients who
had both FE-MRA and non-contrast CT performed between January 2015 to August
2017 were selected for analysis. 3D MR and CT images were segmented and
registered using Mimics (Materialise®, Leuven, Belgium). Unambiguous landmarks such
as implantable medical devices were defined on 3D models of both modalities,
followed by semi-automatic registration for fusion and manual adjustment as needed.
In a subgroup of 5 patients, a total of 247 regions of interest (ROIs) were
marked on implantable medical devices in both the original FE-MRA and fused FE-MRA
using a DICOM viewing software (OsiriX®, Geneva, Switzerland). The deviation
lengths between the corresponding ROIs of each dataset were used to evaluate
the accuracy of image registration. Two observers independently performed image
registration on one patient (47 ROIs) and intraclass correlation coefficients
(ICCs) were used to determine interobserver agreement.RESULTS
Fifteen patients (age 76±12
years, 7 female) with aortic stenosis (n=13) or aortic aneurysm (n=2) and
chronic kidney disease (CKD) underwent FE-MRA and non-contrast CT for
pre-procedural vascular assessment. The concordance correlation coefficients
(CCCs) for image registration between the original FE-MRA and fused image in
each dimension were 0.9997 (ρ=0.9997, 95% CI 0.9996-0.9998), 0.9993 (ρ=0.9994,
95% CI 0.9992-0.9995) and 1 (ρ=1, 95% CI 0.9999-1.0000) in X, Y and Z dimensions
respectively. Interobserver correlation of image registration was excellent
(all ICCs >0.99). No
ferumoxytol-related adverse events occurred in any patient.DISCUSSION
The fusion of FE-MRA and non-contrast CT offers
highly accurate and reproducible image registration for pre-procedural vascular
planning. The use of ferumoxytol with non-contrast CT is especially
advantageous in patients with renal impairment where iodinated contrast media
and gadolinium based contrast agents are contraindicated and where vascular
calcification may be florid. As the purpose of our study was to report the
feasibility of fusion images, the patient sample size is relatively modest. Further, because the method for validation of the
fusion offsets between vasculature and calcifications has not been previously
established, our work was limited to evaluations of the offsets of pacemakers
and catheters between original and fused images. Although
the registration takes less than 5 minutes, the image segmentation is more time
consuming and will require workflow optimization strategies for time sensitive
clinical applications. A deep learning strategy may be relevant for future
implementation of image fusion techniques.CONCLUSIONS
Based on our initial experience, accurate 3D
fusion can be generated by combining FE-MRA and non-contrast CT. This approach
holds promise to combine the complementary strengths of MRI and CT, while
avoiding their respective risks and limitations.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Rogers T, Waksman R. Role of CMR
in TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9(5):593-602.
2. Nguyen
KL, Moriarty JM, Plotnik AN, et al. Ferumoxytol-enhanced MR Angiography for
Vascular Access Mapping before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in
Patients with Renal Impairment: A Step Toward Patient-specific Care. Radiology
2017:162899.
3. Toth
GB, Varallyay CG, Horvath A, et al. Current and potential imaging applications
of ferumoxytol for magnetic resonance imaging. Kidney Int 2017;92(1):47-66.