Surabhi Sood1, David C Reutens1, Shrinath Kadmangudi1, Markus Barth1, and Viktor Vegh1
1Centre for Advanced Imaging, Brisbane, Australia
Synopsis
Quantitative susceptibility mapping is an MRI
tool for mapping anatomical variations. The region specific echo time
dependence of frequency shift curves computed from gradient recalled echo MRI
data are likely due to variations in tissue microstructure, arrangement and
packing. However, the effect of field strength on frequency shift curves has
not been established to date. We investigated how frequency shift curves vary
with field strength (3T versus 7T) and assessed how changes in the quantitative
susceptibility mapping pipeline change the result. 7T data leads to less
variability in frequency shift curves and, non-linear trends are present irrespective
of methodological differences.
Introduction
Magnetic field inhomogeneities caused by tissue
arrangement and composition influence gradient recalled echo MRI (GRE-MRI) data1.
The GRE-MRI signal phase is influenced by magnetic field inhomogeneities, which
can be converted to magnetic susceptibility or induced frequency shifts. We previously
demonstrated echo time dependence in quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) outside
of the corpus callosum2. Whilst the region
specific non-linear trends in frequency shift curves have been suggested to be
due to microstructural differences, they have also been indicated to be due to
methods used to process the data3.
There also exist inconsistencies across existing studies as some were performed
at 3T and others at 7T. We therefore investigated how field strength and
processing pipeline influence frequency shift curves as a function of echo time
in six human brain regions using data acquired in six participants.Methods
Six healthy volunteers (19, 30 and 60 year old males and 26, 33 and 47 year
old females)
were scanned on a 7T whole-body MRI research scanner (Siemens Healthcare,
Erlangen, Germany) with a 32 channel head coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, USA) using
a 3D GRE-MRI
sequence, with the following parameters: TE1 = 4.98ms, echo spacing = 3.13ms, 9 echoes, TR = 52ms,
flip angle = 15o, voxel size = 0.75 ×
0.75 × 0.75 mm, and matrix size = 242 × 280 × 160. The same participants
were scanned on 3T Siemens Magnetom Tim Trio scanner with TE1 =
6.29ms, echo spacing = 5.26ms, 9 echoes, TR = 60ms, flip angle = 18o,
voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm, and matrix size = 210
× 210 × 120. MP2RAGE data with: TE = 3.44ms, TR = 4,550ms, voxel size = 0.75 × 0.75 × 0.75 mm, and matrix size =
300 × 320 × 256 at 7T were acquired to segment six regions using FreeSurfer4
as shown in Fig 2. STI Suite v2.25 was used to perform Laplacian (integrated
method of unwrapping and background field removal) and path-based MRPhaseUnwrap
with V-SHARP, and iLSQR computed magnetic susceptibility maps as shown in
Fig 1. Magnetic susceptibility was then converted to a
frequency shift value for each echo point. The first echo time frequency shift
was subtracted from all other echo time frequency shifts.Results
Fig 3 highlights increased variation
in the log of the signal magnitude of brain regions at 7T as a function of echo number, implying an increase in sensitivity to effects
which results in a deviation away from mono-exponential decay. The inset table summarises
the results obtaining using a one term mono-exponential model fit. The
mono-exponential model was able to better fit the 3T data than the 7T data. Frequency
shift plots shown in Figs 4 and 5 were calculated using the two different
phase unwrapping methods. The amount of variation across participants is larger
at 3T than at 7T, and similar mean trends can be observed irrespective of field
strength and method used to process the data. Discussion
The result in Fig 3 suggests underlying
tissue influences of brain regions are more pronounced at 7T than at 3T. These
are confirmed in Figs 4 and 5, wherein non-linear trends in frequency shift
curves are present irrespective of the MRI field strength and method used to
process data. The trend observed for corpus callosum using the Laplacian method
has previously been demonstrated through simulations (note, we assume almost
perpendicular orientation with respect to scanner field orientation)6.
We previously investigated echo time dependence in human brain regions and
found a pronounced effect at 7T2. Our additional findings presented
here show that the mean 3T and 7T trends are mostly overlapping, and
variability can be decreased by using 7T GRE-MRI data. In addition, the method
used to process data can influence the non-linear behaviour present in
frequency shift curves. The spatial unwrapping method, whilst influencing the
outcome, does not appear to greatly change the shape of the mean trend.
Additional work is needed in terms of signal compartmentalisation to assess how
compartment parameters are affected by the method used to process the
data. Conclusion
Our
results show that 7T data leads to a lower level of variability in frequency shift
curves as a function of echo time than 3T data. The non-linear trend in
frequency shift curves appears to be present at both field strengths and mostly
remain consistent with a change in the processing approach (i.e. Laplacian
which achieves unwrapping and background field removal in a single step, and
path-based unwrapping with V-SHARP background field removal). Acknowledgements
We thank Javier Urriola, Aiman Al-Najjar and Nicole
Atcheson for help with data collection. Surabhi Sood received an Australian
Post-graduate Award for her PhD studies. Viktor Vegh and David Reutens
acknowledge the National Health
and Medical Research Council (NHMRC Project Grant – APP1104933) for funding our
research. Markus Barth acknowledges funding received for his Australian Research
Council Future Fellowship (FT140100865).References
1. Chen
WC, Foxley S, Miller KL, Detecting microstructural properties of white matter
based on compartmentalization of magnetic susceptibility. NeuroImage. 2013;70:1-9.
2. Sood S, Urriola J, Vegh V, et al. Echo
time-dependent quantitative susceptibility mapping contains information on
tissue properties. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(5):1946-58.
3. Cronin MJ, Wang N, Decker KS, et al.
Exploring the origins of echo-time-dependent quantitative susceptibility
mapping (QSM) measurements in healthy tissue and cerebral microbleeds.
NeuroImage. 2017;149(Supplement C):98-113.
4. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical
Surface-Based Analysis: I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction. NeuroImage.
1999;9(2):179-94.
5. Li W, Avram AV, Wu B, et al. Integrated
Laplacian-based phase unwrapping and background phase removal for quantitative
susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed. 2014;27(2):219-27.
6. Wharton S, Bowtell R. Fiber orientation-dependent
white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(45):18559-64.