Christian Strong1, Nicola Toschi2,3, Bruce Rosen2, Lawrence L Wald2, and Marta Bianciardi2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 2Department of Radiology, A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, MGH and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3Medical Physics Section, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
Synopsis
Brainstem and thalamic nuclei such as the inferior-colliculus, superior-colliculus, lateral-geniculate-nucleus,
and medial-geniculate-nucleus modulate visual/oculo-motor
and auditory/auditory-motor functions. Dysfunction of these nuclei is
implicated in disease states such as auditory-agnosia, pure-word deafness, eye-movement
and visual-field deficits, Parkinson’s hallucinations, and glaucoma. However, a stereotaxic probabilistic atlas
of these nuclei in humans does not exist. We used segmentation of
1.1mm-isotropic 7Tesla T2-weighted- and diffusion-fractional-anisotropy-images
to generate and validate an in-vivo probabilistic neuroimaging-based
structural atlas of these nuclei in stereotaxic-MNI space. We constructed this atlas to
aid the localization of these nuclei in conventional images for future research
and clinical investigations of visual/auditory functions.
Introduction
Brainstem and thalamic nuclei such as the inferior colliculus (IC), superior colliculus (SC), medial geniculate nucleus (MG), and lateral geniculate nucleus (LG) modulate visual/oculo-motor (the SC and LG) and auditory/auditory-motor (the IC and MG) functions. These nuclei are involved in the pathogenesis of disorders such as auditory agnosia, pure-word deafness, eye-movement and visual-field deficits, Parkinson’s hallucinations, and glaucoma1-5. Nevertheless, a stereotaxic probabilistic structural atlas of these nuclei in living humans does not exist.Purpose
To create a stereotaxic neuroimaging-based structural atlas of the left and right (l/r) IC, SC, MG, and LG by the use of: 1) cutting-edge technology (7 Tesla scanner, 32-channel receive coil-array) to maximize MRI detection sensitivity; 2) a high-resolution (1.1 mm isotropic) multi-contrast (T2-weighted and diffusion fractional anisotropy (FA)) echo-planar-imaging (EPI) approach, which provided complementary contrasts for brainstem anatomy with precisely matched geometric distortions and resolution.Methods
Data acquisition: Twelve subjects (6m/6f, age 28y ± 1y) underwent 7
Tesla MRI under IRB approval. We adopted a common single-shot 2D EPI readout
for 1.1 mm isotropic T2 weighted (T2w) and diffusion-tensor
(DTI) sagittal images, with matrix size/GRAPPA factor/nominal echo-spacing =
180 × 240/3/0.82 ms. This yielded multi-contrast anatomical images with exactly
matched resolution and geometric distortions. Additional MRI parameters were:
spin-echo EPI, 61 slices, TE/TR = 60.8 ms/5.6 s, partial Fourier:
6/8, unipolar diffusion-weighting gradients for DTI, 60 non collinear-coplanar diffusion
directions (b-value ~ 1000 s/mm2), 7 interspersed “b0” images
(non-diffusion weighted, b-value ~ 0 s/mm2, which were also used as
T2w MRI), 4 repetitions, acquisition time/repetition 6’43”. Data
analysis: After eddy-current distortion correction and motion correction, the
diffusion tensor and FA maps were estimated from DTI data; the T2w
MRI was computed as the average “b0” image. Single-subject T2w/FA
images were coregistered to MNI space through high dimensional non-linear
transformations (ANTs6). On a single-subject basis, two independent
researchers (C.S., M.B.) performed manual segmentation of T2w/FA images to
yield single-subject labels of ICl/r, SCl/r, MGl/r, and LGl/r (nuclei defined
as hypointense regions in T2w images; FA images used to identify the borders of
IC and SC with the cuneiform nucleus). Only voxels rated by both raters as
belonging to a nucleus were included in the final nucleus label. A
probabilistic atlas for these nuclei in MNI space was then created by averaging
the nuclei labels across subjects (highest probability = 100 % overlap across
subjects). Atlas validation: The probabilistic nuclei atlas was
validated by computing for each nucleus and subject: (i) the inter-rater agreement,
as the modified Hausdorff distance7 between labels delineated by the
two raters; (ii) the internal consistency across subjects of the final label,
as the modified Hausdorff distance7 between each final label and the
probabilistic atlas label (thresholded at 35%) generated by averaging the labels
across the other 11 subjects (leave-one-out cross validation). For each
nucleus, the modified Hausdorff distance of (i) and (ii) was then averaged
across subjects and displayed.Results
The probabilistic
neuroimaging-based structural labels in MNI space of ICl/r, SCl/r, MGl/r and LGl/r are shown in Figures 1-4. For each nucleus, the average modified Hausdorff distance assessing the inter-rater agreement
(Figure 5A) and the internal consistency (Figure 5B) of nuclei atlas labels was
below (p < 0.05, unpaired t-test) the linear spatial imaging resolution (1.1
mm), thus validating the generated probabilistic nuclei atlas.Discussion
Our findings demonstrated the feasibility of delineating auditory/visual brainstem and thalamic nuclei by segmentation of single-subject high-contrast and high-sensitivity MRIs at 7 Tesla. This extends previous reports8-10 of manual single-subject localization of some of these nuclei in neuroimages of living humans based on the identification of anatomical landmarks. Crucially, our work also demonstrated the feasibility of generating a validated in vivo stereotaxic probabilistic atlas of these structures after precise coregistration to MNI space. This atlas complements existing in vivo neuroimaging atlases of other brain structures11-14.Conclusions
We foresee the use of the generated probabilitic atlas of the IC, SC, MG, and LG to aid the localization of these nuclei in conventional (e.g. 3 Tesla) images in future research studies of auditory and visual functions. Further, this atlas, upon coregistration to clinical MRI, might improve the evaluation of lesions and the assessment of connectivity pathways underlying auditory and visual mechanisms in a broad set of disease populations (e.g. auditory agnosia, pure-word deafness, eye movement and visual field deficits, Parkinson’s hallucinations, and glaucoma).Acknowledgements
NIH-NIBIB K01EB019474; NIH-NIBIB P41EB015896.References
1. Poliva O, Bestelmeyer PE, Hall M, et al.
Functional mapping of the human auditory cortex: fMRI investigation of a patient
with auditory agnosia from trauma to the inferior colliculus. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2015;28(3):160-180.
2. Joswig H, Schönenberger U, Brügge D, et al.
Reversible pure word deafness due to inferior colliculi compression
by a pineal germinoma in a young adult. Clin
Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;139:62-65.
3. Biotti D, Barbieux M, Brassat D. Teaching Video NeuroImages: Alternating
skew deviation with abducting hypertropia following superior colliculus
infarction. Neurology. 2016;86(9):e93-94.
4. Pasu S, Ridha BH, Wagh V, et al.
Homonymous sectoranopia: asymptomatic presentation of a lateral geniculate nucleus lesion. Neuroophthalmology. 2015;39(6):289-294.
5. Lee JY, Yoon EJ, Lee WW, et al. Lateral geniculate atrophy in Parkinson's with visual
hallucination: a trans-synaptic degeneration? Mov Disord. 2016;31(4):547-54.
6. Avants
BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, et al. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity
metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage. 2011;54(3):2033-2044.
7. Dubuisson
MP, Jain AK. A modified Hausdorff distance for object matching. Proc IAPR Int
Conf Pattern Recognition. Jerusalem, Israel, 1994;1:566-568.
8. Wang J, Miao W, Li J, et al. Automatic segmentation of the lateral
geniculate nucleus: application to control and glaucoma patients. J
Neurosci Methods. 2015;255:104-114.
9. Renauld E, Descoteaux M, Bernier M, et al.
Semi-automatic segmentation of
optic radiations and LGN, and their relationship to EEG alpha waves. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0156436.
10. Li M, He HG, Shi W, et al. Quantification
of the human lateral geniculate nucleus in
vivo using MR imaging based on morphometry: volume loss
with age. AJNR
Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(5):915-921.
11. Destrieux
C, Fischl B, Dale A, et al. Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and
sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage. 2010;53(1):1-15.
12. Desikan
RS, Segonne F, Fischl B, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing
the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest.
Neuroimage. 2006;31(3):968-980.
13. Tzourio-Mazoyer
N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of
activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI
single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002;15(1):273-289.
14. Bianciardi
M, Toschi N, Edlow BE, et al. Toward an in vivo neuroimaging template of human
brainstem nuclei of the ascending arousal, autonomic, and motor systems. Brain
Connect. 2015;5(10):597-607.