Diana Cash1, Tobias Wood1, Francesca Zoratto2, Simone Macri2, Camilla Simmons1, Eugene Kim1, Steve Williams1, Jeffrey Glennon3, and Giovanni Laviola2
1Neuroimaging, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Centre for Behavioural Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità , Rome, Italy, 3Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Synopsis
High resolution ex vivo imaging of mice with high and low empathy-like behavior revealed widespread volumetric
and fractional anisotropy (FA) changes. Low empathy mice had decreased volumes of the dorsal and ventral
hippocampi, periaqueductal grey and the cerebellar cortex, and increased
volumes of the olfactory bulb and the hypothalamus compared to high
empathy mice. FA was decreased in the low empathy group, specifically in the
hippocampus and in the periaqueductal grey. Functional significance can be inferred as these affected brain circuits mediate olfactory cues-based communication of pain, predatory odor fear responses and autonomic stress responses.
Introduction
MRI is increasingly used for investigating the
neural circuits underlying phenotypes in animal models of psychiatric
traits. Multiparametric imaging can reveal areas of the brain exhibiting changes that are often ‘downstream’
from the original dysfunctional neuro-circuit or lesion. Structural differences
persist in the tissue even at post-mortem which enables non-invasive evaluation
of brains before further processing for histological or biochemical biomarkers1.
Here, we performed high resolution ex vivo imaging of mice that were
behaviorally characterized as demonstrating high or low empathy-like behavior,
based on individual responses in a social modulation of pain test 2,3.
The test involves injecting a low dose of formalin into the paws of experimental mice
and measuring their response to pain in the presence of a familiar mouse injected
with higher dose of formalin. “High empathy” mice spend more time licking their
paw when in visual and olfactory contact with the mouse experiencing a higher
degree of discomfort compared to the “low empathy” subgroup.
We acquired structural, DTI and relaxometry (T1
and T2) images, and performed voxel-wise comparisons between the two groups of
mice. Methods
Male adult Balb/cJ mice were behaviorally
tested and separated into high (n=11) and low (n=12) empathy groups. Mice
were killed by transcardiac perfusion with saline followed by 4%
paraformaldehyde. Their heads were stored in phosphate-buffered saline with 0.5%
sodium azide for ca. 5 months. Heads were imaged immersed in perfluoropolyether
(Galden, Solway), four at a time4, in a 9.4T Bruker scanner using a
39mm birdcage RF coil (Rapid). High resolution (100 micron isotropic)
structural images and quantitative T1 and T2 maps were acquired using a
modified DESPOT1 and DESPOT2-FM protocol4 that includes FLASH (TR
48ms, TE 7.695ms, FA 7°,17°,41°), True-FISP (TR 8ms, TE 4ms, FA 15°, 30°,45°) and
AFI (TR 20ms, TE 2.7ms, FA 55°) scans. In addition, a diffusion tensor imaging
(DTI) scan was acquired (TR 4s, TE 22.6ms, 30 directions at b=1500, 4 at
b=0) with 200 micron isotropic resolution from which the maps of fractional
anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were calculated. A group analysis was
carried out on all relaxometry maps, DTI maps and the Jacobian determinant
images with permutation tests and Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement (TFCE)
using FSL randomize4.Results
The results of tensor-based morphometry
analysis revealed changes in several brain areas (Figs 1&3). Changes include
decreased volumes of the dorsal and ventral hippocampi, periaqueductal grey (PAG)
and the cerebellar cortex; as well as increased volumes of the olfactory bulb and the hypothalamus
in the low compared to high empathy mice. Fractional anisotropy (FA), on other
hand, was only decreased in the low empathy group, specifically in the
hippocampus and in the periaqueductal grey (Figs 2&3). There were no
significant differences between groups in MD, T1 or T2. This also suggests that
the observed FA and volume changes are unlikely to be caused by underlying partial
volume or T1 effects. Discussion
This was an exploratory imaging study of
animals segregated by a behavioral phenotype: their social response to pain.
There were significant differences in brain volumes and FA in circuits that
mediate olfactory cues-based communication of pain, as
well as those involved in predatory odor fear responses. Olfactory systems coupled with PAG are
known to process complex predator chemosignals, which also involves the
hippocampus 5,6. Such responses, signaling via
amygdala, activate the hypothalamus-pituitary-axis and the autonomic stress responses. Although we only detected weak unilateral amygdala changes, the
area of medial hypothalamus, possibly including the paraventricular nucleus, was
significantly affected. Interestingly, there is an accumulation of evidence in both humans and rodents that points toward an under-appreciated involvement of
olfactory circuits in stress, resilience and fear7. Moreover, imaging, behavioral and genetic evidence implicates cerebellar dysfunction,
specifically reduced volume and FA, in autism spectrum disorders, where it is known, in both humans and experimental animals that low empathy is one of key features8. FA changes are typically associated with white
matter abnormalities and it is possible that here lower FA reveals lower (or
disorganized) myelination in the low empathy mice. Morphometry results may
indicate alterations in the size and number of different cell types, both
neurons and glia. Further analysis of brain changes associated with these
macroscopic imaging metrics will help to unmask the underlying cellular
pathology. Conclusion
High resolution structural imaging revealed
subtle differences in regional brain volume and fiber organization in a mouse
model of high vs. low empathy-like behavior. Affected brain areas comprise
circuits that mediate fear behavior, olfactory processing and autistic-social
disorders. These findings provide guidance toward further exploration of the
relevant brain areas by histological and genetic means in order to improve our
understanding of the neurobiology of social behavior. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Lerch et al. (2017) Nat
Neurosci 20, 314–326.
2. Langford et al.
(2006) Science 312(5782): 1967.
3.
Gioiosa
et al. (2009) PLoS One 4(1): e4143.
4.
Wood et al. 2016. PeerJ 4,
e2632.
5.
Takahashi (2014) Front in Beh
Neurosci. 8:1
6. Smith
et al. (2016) Science Advances 2(10)e1600855
7.
Chen et al. (2016)
Psychiatry Research 245:36
8.
Silverman et al. (2010) Nat
Rev Neurosci 11(7):490