Katharina Schregel1,2,3, Miklos Palotai2,3, Navid Nazari4, Julie Priya Merchant5, Walter Monroe Taylor5, Charles Guttmann2,3, Ralph Sinkus6, Tracy Young-Pearse3,5, and Samuel Patz2,3
1Institute of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany, 2Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States, 5Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 6Department of Radiological Imaging, Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Aging is accompanied by neurodegeneration, which
affects the cerebral biomechanical properties. We investigated the impact of
age and sex on mouse brain stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography
(MRE). Repeated MRI and MRE exams were performed on 5 male and 5 female healthy
C57BL/6 mice over 14 months. A significant decrease of the viscoelastic modulus
|G*| was observed, while the phase angle Y remained unaltered. Grey and white
matter exhibited significant differences in |G*| and Y. Sex differences were observed in the cortex at
11 months. This is relevant for future cerebral MRE studies on mice.
Introduction
Aging is accompanied by a progressive degradation of
brain tissue due to an ongoing loss of glial cells and neurons1.
This process affects the structural matrix of the brain and has an impact on its
biomechanical properties. Studies in healthy volunteers have shown that aging
leads to a softening of brain tissue2–4.
One group additionally reported differences in stiffness between male and
female brains2,
but other studies have controversial results regarding sex differences in brain
viscoelasticity3,4.
An opposing trend has been observed in adolescent mice, where ongoing brain maturation
caused an increase in brain stiffness5,6.
The aim of this project was to investigate the impact of age and sex on mouse
brain stiffness measured globally and regionally with magnetic resonance
elastography (MRE).Methods
All experiments were approved by the institutional
animal care and use committee. Ten healthy C57BL/6 mice (5 female/5 male) were
included. Longitudinal T2w MRI and 3D MRE images were acquired with a 7 T small
animal scanner at 8, 11 and 14 months of mice age. Regions of interest (ROIs;
Fig. 1), which were defined on T2w images and copied to elastograms, cover the
whole brain, the corpus callosum (as a representative structure of white matter),
the cortex (representative of cortical grey matter) as well as the basal ganglia
and thalamus (representative of deep grey matter). Mean and standard deviation
of two MRE parameters, the viscoelastic modulus |G*| and the phase angle Y,
were calculated for each ROI (|G*| = √(Gd2 + Gl2); Y = 2/π atan(Gl/Gd); Gd = elastic shear modulus, Gl = loss shear modulus). |G*| informs about
tissue rigidity, while Y indicates whether elastic (Y ≈ 0) or viscous (Y ≈
1) properties prevail. Repeated measures two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test
for multiple comparisons were performed to analyze i) regional differences in
brain stiffness over time across the whole cohort and ii) stiffness of grey and
white matter separately over time and between sexes.Results
The viscoelastic modulus |G*| of the whole brain
decreased significantly over time (Fig. 2A, B; 3A). This decrease was
observable for both, grey and white matter structures (p < 0.0001). However,
grey and white matter exhibited significantly different values of the
viscoelastic modulus and the phase angle (Fig. 3). There were no significant
differences between male and female mice in |G*| of the whole brain (p = 0.78),
the corpus callosum (p = 0.24), or the deep grey matter (p = 0.78). When
comparing sexes, the cortex of female mice was significantly stiffer than in
male mice at an age of 11 months (p = 0.03; Fig. 4). In contrast to the
viscoelastic modulus, the phase angle Y of all regions analyzed remained
constant over time (p = 0.15; Fig. 2C, D; 3B). Additionally, the phase angle
was similar for male and female animals (p > 0.05 for all ROIs).
Discussion
This study is the first to investigate the impact of
physiological aging on mouse brain stiffness using MRE. The observed decrease
of the viscoelastic modulus with a concomitantly stable phase angle means that
both elastic and viscous components of brain tissue are affected by aging and
change temporally in synchrony. Our results are in line with findings reported
in human healthy volunteers. Sack et al. ascribed a similar decrease in
viscoelasticity and an unaltered phase angle to a decreasing neuron-glia ratio
with age2,
as glial cells have been found to be softer than neurons7.
Interestingly, there was a difference in cortical stiffness between male and
female mice at 11 months. This may indicate a sexually dimorphic pattern of
neurodegeneration, which has already been demonstrated in the cortex of rats8.
The ROIs used in our study were based on anatomical structures and we found
differences in |G*| and Y between grey and white matter. Previous studies
investigating the stiffness of grey and white matter in humans have been controversial,
as some reported grey matter to be stiffer9,
whereas others found white matter stiffness to be higher10.
Healthy mice of various ages and different sexes are regularly used as controls
in studies assessing stiffness of various pathologies with MRE. Therefore, the
influence of physiological aging processes demonstrated here should be
considered in such studies. Conclusion
Physiological aging impacts mouse brain stiffness.
This is of relevance for future cerebral MRE studies on mice.Acknowledgements
We acknowledge grant support from NIH R21 EB020757,
from European Commission Horizon 2020 proposal 668039 and from Boston
University College of Engineering and the Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Department of Radiology. K.S. received funding from the German Research
Foundation (DFG, SCHR 1542/1-1).References
1. Morrison JH, Hof PR. Life and death of
neurons in the aging brain. Science. 1997;278(5337):412-419.
2. Sack
I, Beierbach B, Wuerfel J, et al. The impact of aging and gender on brain
viscoelasticity. NeuroImage. 2009;46(3):652-657.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.040.
3. Sack
I, Streitberger KJ, Krefting D, el al. The influence of physiological aging and
atrophy on brain viscoelastic properties in humans. PloS One.
2011;6(9):e23451. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023451.
4. Arani
A, Murphy MC, Glaser KJ, et al. Measuring the effects of aging and sex on
regional brain stiffness with MR elastography in healthy older adults. NeuroImage.
2015;111:59-64. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.016.
5. Schregel
K, Wuerfel E, Garteiser P, et al. Demyelination reduces brain parenchymal
stiffness quantified in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(17):6650-6655. doi:10.1073/pnas.1200151109.
6. Munder
T, Pfeffer A, Schreyer S, et al. MR elastography detection of early
viscoelastic response of the murine hippocampus to amyloid β accumulation and
neuronal cell loss due to Alzheimer’s disease. J Magn Reson Imaging.
April 2017:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/jmri.25741.
7. Lu
YB, Franze K, Seifert G, et al. Viscoelastic properties of individual glial
cells and neurons in the CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2006;103(47):17759-17764. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606150103.
8. Markham
JA, Juraska JM. Aging and sex influence the anatomy of the rat anterior
cingulate cortex. Neurobiol Aging. 2002;23(4):579-588.
9. Green
MA, Bilston LE, Sinkus R. In vivo brain viscoelastic properties measured by
magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed. 2008;21(7):755-764.
doi:10.1002/nbm.1254.
10. Kruse
SA, Rose GH, Glaser KJ, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain. NeuroImage.
2008;39(1):231-237. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.030.