Sona Saksena1, Devon M Middleton1, Laura Krisa2, Mahdi Alizadeh1,3, Chris C Conklin1, Adam Flanders1, MJ Mulcahey2, Feroze B Mohamed1, and Scott H Faro4
1Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 2Occupational Therapy, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 3Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 4Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Synopsis: Prior adult studies have shown that DTI allows for
noninvasive assessment of the severity of spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of
this study was to determine whether DTI at sites cephalad and caudal to the
injury provides measures of injury severity in pediatric subjects with chronic
SCI and compared these data with normative DTI data of typically developing
subjects. ROIs were drawn on whole cord and spinal cord white matter (WM) areas: ventral,
dorsal, and both right and left lateral regions along the entire cervical and thoracic SC. For each SCI subject, DTI
parameters for each WM region were measured at the levels cephalad and caudal
relative to MR injury. We demonstrated changes in FA and AD in WM regions at
levels both cephalad and caudal to the injury site. This suggests that FA and
AD has the potential to be sensitive marker of true extent of cord injury and
might be useful in detecting remote injuries.
Introduction
Introduction: Measurements of water diffusion within the spinal cord (SC) after
an injury, including in regions distant from the injury site, may provide valuable
insight into the severity of injury. Prior adult studies have shown that DTI
allows for noninvasive assessment of the severity of spinal cord injury (SCI)1,2,3.
During chronic SCI, the extensive longitudinal spreading of the lesions creates
changes in the SC morphology. Changes in the diffusivity associated with these
structural changes makes it possible to identify the rostral and caudal extent
of the lesion using DTI. The aim of this study was to determine whether DTI at
sites cephalad and caudal to the injury provides measures of injury severity in
pediatric subjects with chronic SCI. We compared these data with the normative
DTI data of the typically developing (TD) pediatric subjects.Methods
Methods: A total of 10 TD (mean age, 12.0±2.93 years) without evidence of SCI
or pathology and 9 subjects with chronic SCI (mean age, 12.48±3.17 years) were
included in the study. SCI subjects underwent a neurological evaluation based
on ISNCSCI and consisted of AIS A (n=6) and B (n=3). They had both cervical and
thoracic injuries. Written informed assent and consent was obtained under the
protocol approved by IRB. Imaging: Subjects underwent scans using 3T Verio MR scanner. The protocol consisted
of conventional T1- and T2-weighted scans and axial DTI scans based
on the inner field of view sequence4 to cover the cervical (C1-upper
thoracic region) and thoracic (upper thoracic region-L1) SC. The imaging
parameters included: 20 diffusion directions, 6 b0 acquisitions, b=800s/mm2,
voxel size=0.8x0.8x6mm3, axial slices=40, TR=7900ms, TE=110ms, and TA=8:49min.
Data
analysis: After motion
correction5 and tensor estimation6, ROIs were manually drawn
to extract information from the whole cord and SC white matter (WM) areas: ventral,
dorsal, and both right and left lateral regions by a board certified pediatric
neuroradiologist (Fig. 1). DTI parameters; FA, MD, AD and RD were quantified at
each intervertebral disk level and at the mid-vertebral body level of the
cervical and thoracic SC in TD and SCI subjects. The axial gradient-echo
T2-weighted MR image was used as a reference for ROI placement on WM
regions.
For each SCI subject, the regions relative to injury were
identified. First, the level of injury was identified using the conventional MR
images. The cephalad region was defined as region above the level of injury
and caudal region was defined as region below the level of injury. We chose
to separate the cephalad and caudal regions into approximately three equal
parts. These three equal parts were distal third, middle third and proximal
third cephalad and caudal to the level of injury. DTI parameters for each WM region
were measured at the levels distal third, middle
third and proximal third cephalad and caudal relative to injury. Statistical
analysis: A t-test was
performed to assess the differences between TD and SCI in regions cephalad
and caudal to injury. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically
significant. Results
Results: FA, MD,
AD and RD showed significant changes in ventral WM in SCI subjects compared to TD
at distal levels cephalad to the injury (Table 1). MD and AD was significantly
lower in whole cord, ventral, dorsal and right lateral WM in SCI subjects
compared to TD at middle levels cephalad to the injury (Table 2). FA was
significantly lower in all the WM regions and whole cord in SCI subjects at
proximal levels caudal to the injury compared to TD (Table 3). MD and AD also showed
significant changes in dorsal, right and left lateral WM at proximal levels
caudal to the injury (Table 3). Discussion
Discussion: An
apriori theory was that there is more abnormality in the adjacent perilesional
(proximal) WM in comparison to the more distal WM above and below the lesion. In
this study, we found that WM regions proximal to the injury site demonstrated altered
diffusion values compared with the distal regions of the cord below (caudal)
the level of injury. However, we also found significant DTI changes in WM
regions at the middle levels above (cephalad) the injury. In addition, we also
found ventral WM changes in the distal cephalad, however no changes were
observed when whole cord ROI’s was used. These variations in diffusivity measures away
from the injury site may reflect changes in tissue structure. Conclusion
Conclusion: We
demonstrated changes in FA and AD in
WM regions at levels both cephalad and caudal to the injury site. In contrast,
conventional MRI showed no cord signal abnormalities. This suggests that FA and
AD has the potential
to be sensitive marker of true extent of cord injury and might be useful in
detecting remote injuries.Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders of the
National Institutes of Health under award number R01NS079635 (Mohamed FB
and Mulcahey MJ, PI).References
References: 1. Ellingson BM, Ulmer JL, Kurpad
SN et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in chronic spinal cord injury. AJNR 2008;29:1976-1982.
2. Koskinen E, Brander A, Hakulinen U,
et al. Assessing the state of chronic spinal cord injury using diffusion tensor
imaging. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:1587-1595. 3. Petersen
JA, Wilm BJ, von Meyenburg J et al. Chronic cervical spinal cord injury: DTI
correlates with clinical and electrophysiological measures. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:1556-1566. 4. Finsterbusch
J. Improving the performance of diffusion-weighted inner field-of-view
echo-planar imaging based on 2D-selective radiofrequency excitations by tilting
the excitation plane. JMRI 2012;35:984–992. 5. Middleton DM, Mohamed
FB, Barakat N et al. An investigation of motion correction algorithms for
pediatric spinal cord DTI in healthy subjects and patients with spinal cord
injury. MRI 2014;32:433-39. 6. Saksena S, Middleton DM, Krisa L et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the normal cervical and thoracic pediatric spinal cord. AJNR
Jul 14. [Epub ahead of print]