Antonia Barghoorn1,2, Katharina Paul1, Till Huelnhagen1, and Thoralf Niendorf1,3
1Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany, 2Technische Universität, Berlin, Germany, 3Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
Synopsis
Inversion
recovery prepared cardiac black blood RARE techniques (IR-RARE) are routinely
applied at clinical field strengths while still facing numerous challenges at
7.0 T. Realizing the clinical importance of IR-RARE and the benefits of UHF,
this study aims at the design of a double inversion recovery prepared imaging
technique at 7.0 T. The inversion efficiency and signal suppression efficiency
of hyperbolic secant (HS4 and HS8) inversion pulses were analyzed in phantom
experiments. First preliminary in-vivo applications using the implemented HSn
pulses showed promising results.
Introduction
Inversion recovery (IR) prepared black blood
RARE/fast spin echo techniques [1] are applied at clinical field
strengths for morphological imaging of the heart and large vessels [1], for the assessment of myocardial
edema [2, 3], and for noninvasive myocardial
tissue characterization [4]. The SNR gain inherent to imaging
at 7.0 T promises to enhance spatial and temporal resolution. At 7.0 T, the use
of IR prepared RARE imaging is challenged by transmission field (B1+)
inhomogeneities, prolonged T1 relaxation, and increased radiofrequency
power deposition. Realizing the clinical importance of black blood preparation for cardiac imaging and recognizing
the benefits of UHF-MR, this study aims at the design of a double inversion
recovery (DIR) prepared RARE imaging technique for cardiac dark blood imaging
at 7.0 T.Methods
In order to enable DIR, two hyperbolic secant (HS4
and HS8) pulses were designed using MATLAB [5] and implemented into a RARE pulse
sequence (Fig.1). A water-CuSO4 phantom was built in-house for the
assessment of the inversion pulse quality at 7.0 T (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany).
The assessment included inversion efficiency quantification ($$$IE=M_z(TI=0)/M_0$$$) [6] using one inversion pulse and
the calculation of signal suppression efficiency. Two different transceiver coil
arrays were used: a 1TX/24RX head coil (Nova Medical, Inc., MA, USA) (setup A) and
a 16TX/RX cardiac RF coil array (MRI.TOOLS GmbH, Berlin, Germany) (setup B).
For setup B, the water-CuSO4 phantom was placed into the center of a
torso agarose phantom (Fig.2d) to mimic the location of the heart within the
body. The slice profile of the inversion pulses was tested for setup B using a DIR-prepared
sequence, with the slice selective pulse set to be orthogonal to the imaging
slice. Inversion pulse parameters (pulse length tp, peak amplitude A0,
and bandwidth) were varied as part of the quality assessment and chosen to be tp=25
ms, bwdth=11 kHz, and A0=450 V. Following the
phantom study, in-vivo experiments in healthy volunteers were performed.Results
Phantom experiments
revealed similar inversion efficiencies when using the HS4 and HS8 pulses (Fig.2). The IE for setup A using one inversion pulse was
IE=-0.97 with a standard deviation σ=0.03, while it was IE=-0.91 and σ=0.11 for
setup B. Signal suppression of the blood compartment was successful with Mz(TInull)/M0=0.01 and σ=0.01 using the head RF coil and Mz(TInull)/M0=0.02 with σ=0.02
using the cardiac RF coil (Fig.3). The slice profile of the inversion pulses was
measured for setup B using DIR and revealed Mz(blood)/Mz(slice)=0.04
(Fig.4). Figure
5 shows dark blood four-chamber views acquired in an exemplary healthy volunteer. The
contrast between myocardium and blood was calculated to be $$$ν=(I_{myo}-I_{blood})/(I_{myo}+I_{blood})=0.31$$$ without dark blood preparation compared to $$$ν=0.64$$$ when using DIR (Fig.5).
Discussion
While the inversion
efficiency of the HS4/HS8-pulses was sufficient with IE=-0.97 and σ=0.03 when using
the head RF coil, the quality of the inversion pulses using the cardiac RF coil
array was 6% lower with IE=-0.91 and σ=0.11. It was observed that magnetization
inversion over a larger field of view requires a significantly higher B1+
so parameters like the inversion pulse length and peak amplitude needed to be
adjusted accordingly. However, longer pulse lengths induce T2 decay during
the pulse duration. Also, the peak amplitude is constrained due to SAR and limited
peak RF power. A successful in-vivo implementation therefore requires a careful
balance of IE, SAR, and T2 relaxation effects. Preliminary in-vivo
experiments showed an improvement of myocardium-blood-contrast by 106%. Since TI
depends on TR which is determined by the length of the cardiac cycle, heartbeat
irregularities lead to insufficient blood suppression, enhanced flow artifacts,
and irregular acquisition times. Current work therefore focuses on an
optimization of sequence parameters to facilitate an application for irregular
heartbeats. Furthermore, a hybrid RARE-EPI [7] pulse sequence will be used in future in-vivo
applications. This Combined Acquisition Technique (CAT) benefits from shorter
acquisition times since the use of EPI echoes shortens the echo train length, while
still achieving high image quality [7]. With this approach cardiac and respiratory motion
artifacts can be minimized.Conclusion
In
this study, the efficacy of HS4/HS8 pulses was examined for IR-prepared dark
blood RARE MRI at 7.0 T using a 1TX/24RX channel head coil and a 16TX/RX cardiac RF coil array. The magnetization inversion is more
successful when using the small size head RF coil, but first in-vivo
implementations using the designed inversion pulses were promising. Current
work focuses on the adjustment of sequence parameters in order to balance SAR and
transmit voltage and to support data acquisition for irregular heartbeats. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Simonetti,
O.P., et al., "Black blood" T2-weighted
inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. Radiology, 1996. 199(1): p. 49-57.
[2] Abdel-Aty, H., O. Simonetti, and
M.G. Friedrich, T2-weighted
cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Imaging, 2007. 26(3): p. 452-459.
[3] h-Ici, D.O., et al., Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of
myocardial edema using a short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR)
black-blood technique: diagnostic accuracy of visual and semi-quantitative assessment.
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2012. 14: p. 22.
[4] Heinrichs, U., et al., Myocardial T2* mapping
free of distortion using susceptibility-weighted fast spin-echo imaging: a
feasibility study at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Magn Reson Med, 2009. 62(3): p. 822-8.
[5] MATLAB,
The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States.
[6] Kellman, P., D.A. Herzka, and M.S.
Hansen, Adiabatic inversion pulses for
myocardial T1 mapping. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2014. 71(4): p. 1428-1434.
[7] Hillenbrand, C., et al., MR CAT scan: a modular approach for hybrid
imaging. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine,
2000. 10(3): p. 183-199.
[8] Rodgers, C.T., et al., Inversion recovery at 7 T in the human
myocardium: measurement of T1, inversion efficiency and B1+. Magnetic
resonance in medicine, 2013. 70(4):
p. 1038-1046.
[9] Bernstein, M.A., K.F. King, and X.J.
Zhou, Handbook of MRI pulse sequences2004:
Elsevier.